Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964998AbWJ3PG1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Oct 2006 10:06:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964990AbWJ3PG1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Oct 2006 10:06:27 -0500 Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:49825 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030389AbWJ3PG0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Oct 2006 10:06:26 -0500 Subject: Re: [patch] drivers: wait for threaded probes between initcall levels From: Arjan van de Ven To: Xavier Bestel Cc: Kyle Moffett , Linus Torvalds , "Adam J. Richter" , akpm@osdl.org, bunk@stusta.de, greg@kroah.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, matthew@wil.cx, pavel@ucw.cz, shemminger@osdl.org In-Reply-To: <1162220452.30605.47.camel@frg-rhel40-em64t-03> References: <200610282350.k9SNoljL020236@freya.yggdrasil.com> <1162219080.2948.21.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> <1162220452.30605.47.camel@frg-rhel40-em64t-03> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Intel International BV Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 16:05:57 +0100 Message-Id: <1162220757.2948.29.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.8.0 (2.8.0-7.fc6) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by pentafluge.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1560 Lines: 33 On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 16:00 +0100, Xavier Bestel wrote: > On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 15:38 +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > > how much of this complexity goes away if you consider the > > scanning/probing as a series of "work elements", and you end up with a > > queue of work elements that threads can pull work off one at a time (so > > that if one element blocks the others just continue to flow). If you > > then find, say, a new PCI bus you just put another work element to > > process it at the end of the queue, or you process it synchronously. Etc > > etc. > > > > All you need to scale then is the number of worker threads on the > > system, which should be relatively easy to size.... > > (check every X miliseconds if there are more than X outstanding work > > elements, if there are, spawn one new worker thread if the total number > > of worker threads is less than the system wide max. Worker threads die > > if they have nothing to do for more than Y miliseconds) > > Instead of checking every X ms, just check at each job insertion. that would lead to a too eager amount of threads if processing the jobs is really really quick ... -- if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com Test the interaction between Linux and your BIOS via http://www.linuxfirmwarekit.org - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/