Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 21 May 2021 10:15:23 +0200
From:   Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
To:     Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Cc:     Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
        virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        virtio-fs-list <virtio-fs@redhat.com>,
        Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
        Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] fuse: Fix leak in fuse_dentry_automount() error
 path
Message-ID: <20210521101523.4f276dac@bahia.lan>
In-Reply-To: <CAJfpegvFUasy_8djyvo-fpyboOLGwRV9k_CL-e1nqxcXHkvzOg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20210520154654.1791183-1-groug@kaod.org>
        <20210520154654.1791183-2-groug@kaod.org>
        <YKa8SZ8s6QeKZ4XP@zeniv-ca.linux.org.uk>
        <CAJfpegvFUasy_8djyvo-fpyboOLGwRV9k_CL-e1nqxcXHkvzOg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 21 May 2021 09:54:19 +0200
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> wrote:

> On Thu, 20 May 2021 at 21:45, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 05:46:50PM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > > Some rollback was forgotten during the addition of crossmounts.
> >
> > Have you actually tested that?  Because I strongly suspect that
> > by that point the ownership of fc and fm is with sb and those
> > should be taken care of by deactivate_locked_super().
> 
> Not quite.  Patch looks correct because destruction of fm is done in
> fuse_put_super(), which only gets called if the sb initialization gets
> as far as setting up sb->s_root, which only happens after the
> successful fuse_fill_super_submount() call in this case.
> 
> Doing the destruction from the various ->kill_sb() instances instead
> of from ->put_super() would also fix this, but I'm not quite sure that
> that would be any cleaner.
> 

As saying in the answer I've just posted, a failure in
fuse_fill_super_submount() causes an actual crash because
fuse_mount_remove() logically assumes fm to already be in
fc->mounts, which isn't the case at this point.

In the root mount case, this is handled by taking back
the ownership on fm, i.e. do the rollback *and* clear
sb->s_fs_info. It seems that the same should be done
for submounts.

> Thanks,
> Miklos