Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp1002759pxj; Fri, 21 May 2021 04:18:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwkS5gM6CxC3iZ9aAt4bGY231tGHX7f9qtMAui3DhQ66K2vtU8DvNhJ6y3us7pYPZMdYoHj X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:3883:: with SMTP id q3mr9682517ejd.4.1621595918093; Fri, 21 May 2021 04:18:38 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1621595918; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=vWYHVg1xC1L2U0+lNBpkQ2eQRyXF9lwAx702hON3iIP+5psPE7cf3Gn1wioi4MNfLr jU1H/C/LvlXAcSGXgcS0Yv6XyAkM/7bdXcViJ7I0d+oYOlaCo4kMzhvhXKfxi/IxH2WL hYmPP7htJTyD/79zsDObOlYNL22dxEeV98dV3X3A+bR3FD5rNoyYuQwvGP+MDtehucl3 AgMe5wHLE5Mrd2+8dXL8iGNdftbl2y+z8NCEXHvVt4RqV8bZHA4+3b1n59AFI1BB6f1d ZnroUCPWaIh0CCZj1WIxBoSzm2x3/q4dncNfRSCOu4bp4abNx4eOBTLWMOmKbU4gTMff /lqg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject :cc:to:from:dkim-signature; bh=d4ttKCOYGlPANGRL5I5eYWePmnjLRicDrCzRRbqf6M0=; b=LSuQpi9ScydbDsEdJkXZfWgAmoXfG9xkdU+2dbfIeuQ/zd6z0Xa504wThvy3NxgxxU DUONDA9SLrdABda0tCRJJE4IsReztC1N48ZTpfXNio1X/QAJVMqwm2Ik8uLTgAElgNQx NLry2gK07t2ZCbsYci3Gg5f3vhN2thj3d/LvgyWDbKMyvX4i22YXv13zqAa1OGM2WHJG 3v/lKhqcrHZD9SYr2dDcp2UQy87wKTcCJCD1BN/ytFlon1Nfdt7FPt5O9HrNef3zf+rG cG7odw607RfUsRj4qmb2SmWLELmvRavjwv9Ipmvrz8FZRWWyJBvkq/3DMq4n1vRogkIh AB4w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Yhhh5f5v; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id dv19si5247613ejb.195.2021.05.21.04.18.15; Fri, 21 May 2021 04:18:38 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Yhhh5f5v; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237065AbhEUJpG (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 21 May 2021 05:45:06 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:33498 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236951AbhEUJol (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 May 2021 05:44:41 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-x62d.google.com (mail-pl1-x62d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA5A4C061574; Fri, 21 May 2021 02:43:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x62d.google.com with SMTP id u7so2114105plq.4; Fri, 21 May 2021 02:43:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references; bh=d4ttKCOYGlPANGRL5I5eYWePmnjLRicDrCzRRbqf6M0=; b=Yhhh5f5vRcMVPZic8w1VbI5A9ULne9P2DtKDzmZHTtiKVPnH3IJnDrTBuojg5qCaeg dumxD6FZSABTa0rFtj6rI76Mr1wB7kFC5rebpuM8lFH27oA86ahxYQhUH0QrJdrkNOAn oBDnJ122Z+6BlXCPejrFLBs5x4KJxK25WK5QoUMWqSDq5hZOIIS/MVB3LRrlLlAr/3ot 3Y2cr9zEOUh8ar/Kw7NkEF99p+5xbKEzXfq1fyINmr/1G6FQbAjPC6n4r1wy5cmzPp9i t9lS0D3Rli6WsuTY9o+0u4iH3TJXjHtDB3x+ajqZvL4FfcRAWylZbFvJ65OebkMR4djm tcNg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references; bh=d4ttKCOYGlPANGRL5I5eYWePmnjLRicDrCzRRbqf6M0=; b=crrHPV6MMufwCTZJP4lVpwq5hzGkmlf+IYFclWH+W0e7dIwSBS477lOSXoD2D+Yzxt R8puytKnzAnSLXu/2S9yuIipLS9N9astUOYDR68gLgfyF9L09OunmiQZoK5EOrv0Qves 1n5cdr+BGD6eV7gv3uoZtUS/416qtDtZlsgEuvbyS9weqB8/ghkrCuogfB58uU86lKV8 Wt29l3Npc+rdUjBygbnzjThO1sRTlv2QA3ZSbyHfYOku1MkiKa2Kee47gROK2VGja9AT +H7KAbAPmI8NKvx0iWfgpdz394D42hOrzx1uJiShiw8ODoKWDf5fkO3NuYPRDaVUTtZw L5pw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532bx8NadiaCAc09QPA3HVFcbcBoSmqgqficq6OohhT3SX+I17w1 URhZRj00PM1IG9KfCe8FwK63BEGENS0= X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:2403:b029:ef:9419:b914 with SMTP id e3-20020a1709032403b02900ef9419b914mr11162027plo.59.1621590197307; Fri, 21 May 2021 02:43:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from linux-l9pv.suse ([124.11.22.254]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g202sm4091931pfb.54.2021.05.21.02.43.13 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 21 May 2021 02:43:17 -0700 (PDT) From: "Lee, Chun-Yi" X-Google-Original-From: "Lee, Chun-Yi" To: David Howells Cc: Herbert Xu , "David S . Miller" , Ben Boeckel , Randy Dunlap , Malte Gell , Varad Gautam , keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Lee, Chun-Yi" Subject: [PATCH v7,2/4] PKCS#7: Check codeSigning EKU for kernel module and kexec pe verification Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 17:42:18 +0800 Message-Id: <20210521094220.1238-3-jlee@suse.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.12.3 In-Reply-To: <20210521094220.1238-1-jlee@suse.com> References: <20210521094220.1238-1-jlee@suse.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org This patch adds the logic for checking the CodeSigning extended key usage when verifying signature of kernel module or kexec PE binary in PKCS#7. Signed-off-by: "Lee, Chun-Yi" --- certs/blacklist.c | 6 +++-- certs/system_keyring.c | 4 ++-- crypto/asymmetric_keys/Kconfig | 9 ++++++++ crypto/asymmetric_keys/pkcs7_trust.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- include/crypto/pkcs7.h | 4 +++- include/keys/system_keyring.h | 7 ++++-- 6 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/certs/blacklist.c b/certs/blacklist.c index c9a435b15af4..a4ef26286584 100644 --- a/certs/blacklist.c +++ b/certs/blacklist.c @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include "blacklist.h" #include "common.h" @@ -181,11 +182,12 @@ int add_key_to_revocation_list(const char *data, size_t size) * is_key_on_revocation_list - Determine if the key for a PKCS#7 message is revoked * @pkcs7: The PKCS#7 message to check */ -int is_key_on_revocation_list(struct pkcs7_message *pkcs7) +int is_key_on_revocation_list(struct pkcs7_message *pkcs7, + enum key_being_used_for usage) { int ret; - ret = pkcs7_validate_trust(pkcs7, blacklist_keyring); + ret = pkcs7_validate_trust(pkcs7, blacklist_keyring, usage, false); if (ret == 0) return -EKEYREJECTED; diff --git a/certs/system_keyring.c b/certs/system_keyring.c index 692365dee2bd..394cf4e0feed 100644 --- a/certs/system_keyring.c +++ b/certs/system_keyring.c @@ -221,13 +221,13 @@ int verify_pkcs7_message_sig(const void *data, size_t len, goto error; } - ret = is_key_on_revocation_list(pkcs7); + ret = is_key_on_revocation_list(pkcs7, usage); if (ret != -ENOKEY) { pr_devel("PKCS#7 platform key is on revocation list\n"); goto error; } } - ret = pkcs7_validate_trust(pkcs7, trusted_keys); + ret = pkcs7_validate_trust(pkcs7, trusted_keys, usage, true); if (ret < 0) { if (ret == -ENOKEY) pr_devel("PKCS#7 signature not signed with a trusted key\n"); diff --git a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/Kconfig b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/Kconfig index 1f1f004dc757..1754812df989 100644 --- a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/Kconfig +++ b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/Kconfig @@ -96,4 +96,13 @@ config SIGNED_PE_FILE_VERIFICATION This option provides support for verifying the signature(s) on a signed PE binary. +config CHECK_CODESIGN_EKU + bool "Check codeSigning extended key usage" + depends on PKCS7_MESSAGE_PARSER=y + depends on SYSTEM_DATA_VERIFICATION + help + This option provides support for checking the codeSigning extended + key usage when verifying the signature in PKCS#7. It affects kernel + module verification and kexec PE binary verification. + endif # ASYMMETRIC_KEY_TYPE diff --git a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/pkcs7_trust.c b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/pkcs7_trust.c index b531df2013c4..c6ebf3e6adfd 100644 --- a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/pkcs7_trust.c +++ b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/pkcs7_trust.c @@ -16,12 +16,40 @@ #include #include "pkcs7_parser.h" +#ifdef CONFIG_CHECK_CODESIGN_EKU +static bool check_eku_by_usage(struct key *key, enum key_being_used_for usage) +{ + struct public_key *public_key = key->payload.data[asym_crypto]; + bool ret = true; + + switch (usage) { + case VERIFYING_MODULE_SIGNATURE: + case VERIFYING_KEXEC_PE_SIGNATURE: + ret = !!(public_key->eku & EKU_codeSigning); + if (!ret) + pr_warn("The signer '%s' key is not CodeSigning\n", + key->description); + break; + default: + break; + } + return ret; +} +#else +static bool check_eku_by_usage(struct key *key, enum key_being_used_for usage) +{ + return true; +} +#endif + /* * Check the trust on one PKCS#7 SignedInfo block. */ static int pkcs7_validate_trust_one(struct pkcs7_message *pkcs7, struct pkcs7_signed_info *sinfo, - struct key *trust_keyring) + struct key *trust_keyring, + enum key_being_used_for usage, + bool check_eku) { struct public_key_signature *sig = sinfo->sig; struct x509_certificate *x509, *last = NULL, *p; @@ -112,6 +140,10 @@ static int pkcs7_validate_trust_one(struct pkcs7_message *pkcs7, return -ENOKEY; matched: + if (check_eku && !check_eku_by_usage(key, usage)) { + key_put(key); + return -ENOKEY; + } ret = verify_signature(key, sig); key_put(key); if (ret < 0) { @@ -135,6 +167,8 @@ static int pkcs7_validate_trust_one(struct pkcs7_message *pkcs7, * pkcs7_validate_trust - Validate PKCS#7 trust chain * @pkcs7: The PKCS#7 certificate to validate * @trust_keyring: Signing certificates to use as starting points + * @usage: The use to which the key is being put. + * @check_eku: Check EKU (Extended Key Usage) * * Validate that the certificate chain inside the PKCS#7 message intersects * keys we already know and trust. @@ -156,7 +190,9 @@ static int pkcs7_validate_trust_one(struct pkcs7_message *pkcs7, * May also return -ENOMEM. */ int pkcs7_validate_trust(struct pkcs7_message *pkcs7, - struct key *trust_keyring) + struct key *trust_keyring, + enum key_being_used_for usage, + bool check_eku) { struct pkcs7_signed_info *sinfo; struct x509_certificate *p; @@ -167,7 +203,8 @@ int pkcs7_validate_trust(struct pkcs7_message *pkcs7, p->seen = false; for (sinfo = pkcs7->signed_infos; sinfo; sinfo = sinfo->next) { - ret = pkcs7_validate_trust_one(pkcs7, sinfo, trust_keyring); + ret = pkcs7_validate_trust_one(pkcs7, sinfo, trust_keyring, + usage, check_eku); switch (ret) { case -ENOKEY: continue; diff --git a/include/crypto/pkcs7.h b/include/crypto/pkcs7.h index 38ec7f5f9041..5d87b8a02f79 100644 --- a/include/crypto/pkcs7.h +++ b/include/crypto/pkcs7.h @@ -30,7 +30,9 @@ extern int pkcs7_get_content_data(const struct pkcs7_message *pkcs7, * pkcs7_trust.c */ extern int pkcs7_validate_trust(struct pkcs7_message *pkcs7, - struct key *trust_keyring); + struct key *trust_keyring, + enum key_being_used_for usage, + bool check_eku); /* * pkcs7_verify.c diff --git a/include/keys/system_keyring.h b/include/keys/system_keyring.h index 6acd3cf13a18..3da982c3aef5 100644 --- a/include/keys/system_keyring.h +++ b/include/keys/system_keyring.h @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ #define _KEYS_SYSTEM_KEYRING_H #include +#include #ifdef CONFIG_SYSTEM_TRUSTED_KEYRING @@ -59,13 +60,15 @@ static inline int is_binary_blacklisted(const u8 *hash, size_t hash_len) #ifdef CONFIG_SYSTEM_REVOCATION_LIST extern int add_key_to_revocation_list(const char *data, size_t size); -extern int is_key_on_revocation_list(struct pkcs7_message *pkcs7); +extern int is_key_on_revocation_list(struct pkcs7_message *pkcs7, + enum key_being_used_for usage); #else static inline int add_key_to_revocation_list(const char *data, size_t size) { return 0; } -static inline int is_key_on_revocation_list(struct pkcs7_message *pkcs7) +static inline int is_key_on_revocation_list(struct pkcs7_message *pkcs7, + enum key_being_used_for usage); { return -ENOKEY; } -- 2.16.4