Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 21 May 2021 12:02:06 +0100
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc:     Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Matthias Maennich <maennich@google.com>,
        Giuliano Procida <gprocida@google.com>, kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] export: Make CRCs robust to symbol trimming
Message-ID: <20210521110206.GE2549456@dell>
References: <20210408180105.2496212-1-qperret@google.com>
 <YJkJ21n71SIkUppu@google.com>
 <CAF2Aj3iJ3jGCSTaO0p8WT2TrRX--QxQT0bD6iH1+OGbx5H-muQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <YKePWull0E86SXpm@kroah.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <YKePWull0E86SXpm@kroah.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 21 May 2021, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:

> On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 10:57:44AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 May 2021 at 11:25, Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Thursday 08 Apr 2021 at 18:01:05 (+0000), Quentin Perret wrote:
> > > > The CRC calculation done by genksyms is triggered when the parser hits
> > > > EXPORT_SYMBOL*() macros. At this point, genksyms recursively expands the
> > > > types, and uses that as the input for the CRC calculation. In the case
> > > > of forward-declared structs, the type expands to 'UNKNOWN'. Next, the
> > > > result of the expansion of each type is cached, and is re-used when/if
> > > > the same type is seen again for another exported symbol in the file.
> > > >
> > > > Unfortunately, this can cause CRC 'stability' issues when a struct
> > > > definition becomes visible in the middle of a C file. For example, let's
> > > > assume code with the following pattern:
> > > >
> > > >     struct foo;
> > > >
> > > >     int bar(struct foo *arg)
> > > >     {
> > > >       /* Do work ... */
> > > >     }
> > > >     EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bar);
> > > >
> > > >     /* This contains struct foo's definition */
> > > >     #include "foo.h"
> > > >
> > > >     int baz(struct foo *arg)
> > > >     {
> > > >       /* Do more work ... */
> > > >     }
> > > >     EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(baz);
> > > >
> > > > Here, baz's CRC will be computed using the expansion of struct foo that
> > > > was cached after bar's CRC calculation ('UNKOWN' here). But if
> > > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bar) is removed from the file (because of e.g. symbol
> > > > trimming using CONFIG_TRIM_UNUSED_KSYMS), struct foo will be expanded
> > > > late, during baz's CRC calculation, which now has visibility over the
> > > > full struct definition, hence resulting in a different CRC for baz.
> > > >
> > > > This can cause annoying issues for distro kernel (such as the Android
> > > > Generic Kernel Image) which use CONFIG_UNUSED_KSYMS_WHITELIST. Indeed,
> > > > as per the above, adding a symbol to the whitelist can change the CRC of
> > > > symbols that are already kept exported. As such, modules built against a
> > > > kernel with a trimmed ABI may not load against the same kernel built
> > > > with an extended whitelist, even though they are still strictly binary
> > > > compatible. While rebuilding the modules would obviously solve the
> > > > issue, I believe this classifies as an odd genksyms corner case, and it
> > > > gets in the way of kernel updates in the GKI context.
> > > >
> > > > To work around the issue, make sure to keep issuing the
> > > > __GENKSYMS_EXPORT_SYMBOL macros for all trimmed symbols, hence making
> > > > the genksyms parsing insensitive to symbol trimming.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
> > >
> > > Gentle ping.
> > >
> > > Is there anything else I should do in this one?
> > >
> > 
> > With Greg's Ack and ~6 weeks on the list, you're probably golden.
> > 
> > I *could* pick this up, but seems wrong somehow.
> > 
> > Greg, is this something you're prepared to merge?  If not, who's the
> > g{uy,al}?
> 
> What does get_maintainer.pl show?

It doesn't [0], which is why I commented in this way. :)

[0]:

 Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org> (commit_signer:2/5=40%)
 Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov@gmail.com> (commit_signer:2/5=40%)
 Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz> (commit_signer:2/5=40%)
 Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> (commit_signer:2/5=40%,authored:1/5=20%,added_lines:1/7=14%,removed_lines:1/11=9%)
 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> (commit_signer:1/5=20%)
 Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com> (authored:1/5=20%,added_lines:5/7=71%)
 Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> (authored:1/5=20%,added_lines:1/7=14%,removed_lines:1/11=9%)
 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Senior Technical Lead - Developer Services
Linaro.org │ Open source software for Arm SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog