Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp1386691pxj; Fri, 21 May 2021 12:58:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxEC8Z85og0mVHTwbFkrUgghBuf6jxAK+L7LG6zhrTkmPW/qXL/Xxw/+Olc8YccXnVvDx6m X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:d14b:: with SMTP id br11mr12077561ejb.490.1621627135216; Fri, 21 May 2021 12:58:55 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1621627135; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=jrdhrNvmeuE163kUe3wqjxKUHvFSujdUYN25D4C3w5mbPnZFrEkaa42XuDQZtLyj8Q i8q71eVLKKauWo7MULUHUstQ12S73jctnmW0FANFK5ccls5wY/9Xl0Wnrw91YPn6W7UR HOfLjnb9FfLYfMIuJrM/kdJdd9PRh9lPZyyqcVUMHvgc0xx42aSZE1NykKYH37AT7Sof b3IccKXIFr0Aeaz1xB/OlzOjiH35ZTSkL0XNE1c6gJU58QHcJUVxD7NKyw29wb1tsMy9 4fFDBtYND+gBDx1MJ5qbgJWnL1LU0s/IM4xfgatZySu/axZrbrEk5JLb2eoG1EJ85sod jGWg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=JDuRhdD0c+I8x9p2xseG7EsWF35hPeDyR9fNC7DqgL0=; b=v9BXt5Z6idG5+CC4UrLK6ZdQxPDIUwM2Tf89fmqINQyTpZ3yaBc5ksNJrF/7qbNHuz jdQPuj+ebJ1GzLRxDVDUpjjJZcqSbTTmL1tfs1dRT3El+M7l7hUnWul8S3Scv8GWdvZQ usEY4i760nlggilSGxmY8udSl1Ux5XWyPFXhcBsatSJcyEBWCQ8VGZX+yToVAk3FwBp0 C6LVF/aHmL08IiTWIj1rthEwH/Yy0kP82nhZ+kb7wuef1mgntK5iZtTyLGttMd6pAZHi sVT1+UxDvDBkeCsvUAflNDhe+5nFgDGQBnurFCArYX2S+byygc2p58D4a2T01gNUWUe1 LaDw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b="ChvS/XCp"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q5si6276564edn.265.2021.05.21.12.58.31; Fri, 21 May 2021 12:58:55 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@chromium.org header.s=google header.b="ChvS/XCp"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=chromium.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230037AbhETVPk (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 20 May 2021 17:15:40 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34966 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230032AbhETVPk (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2021 17:15:40 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x102d.google.com (mail-pj1-x102d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102d]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48A6BC061763 for ; Thu, 20 May 2021 14:14:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x102d.google.com with SMTP id g24so9804316pji.4 for ; Thu, 20 May 2021 14:14:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=JDuRhdD0c+I8x9p2xseG7EsWF35hPeDyR9fNC7DqgL0=; b=ChvS/XCpiCjagokqDdvJr+aJoJuu4cFnMUg2lcjpmf6uYamCI71lziN+fHQ7mbexEj itAg6b8BvXH4iwtz3uFLDaAGfP8hb4NFtgZCiC9azDp+lk5A5wrSjjbJaErvsVZdJzeQ fWUwfNUsxb0z3kUN5Zud/t8V1s546c+98Bu+g= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=JDuRhdD0c+I8x9p2xseG7EsWF35hPeDyR9fNC7DqgL0=; b=aHyd2XI9Odau40eJeDenTn5vfWHHR7z/JzOJHBLkxb31QL4fG8Es873K5T7lnPXkRY kVlsPVna7+7ajnIfS5oeF1AMJstDSMqPFPCBlOFVIagGmamI5tLN55UeT8di2bB8r/KS yoGc2ZOO+TR66ZzDd0G37WiZtUIxfBiRnJ7y6zNp1C9LclFopq3GDq2UlGyIVeAhsJjC mBAUXY+2aEtYVizvswwkOdzxh7iHrGb3zPYRi5qoLiKy2F676YdO7Z49E72GbFOZLDIq 9YbEJDlJBrhNj9ObYd6k4cFuIggcwSQMRO5NjOocav1ClROJXS1gynVvFOBJ4Sjy/TLU BX4Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533RQFxpEfv3845Yu25sZr+juOxsw3Ak5aGFpMst1Dp2RYuR3BLN Djj7J8iV1u7b2RilNH+Q5yE2YQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:1955:: with SMTP id nk21mr7314169pjb.208.1621545257677; Thu, 20 May 2021 14:14:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2620:15c:202:201:7ac6:cb3b:191b:54f3]) by smtp.gmail.com with UTF8SMTPSA id c19sm2125745pfo.150.2021.05.20.14.14.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 20 May 2021 14:14:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 20 May 2021 14:14:15 -0700 From: Matthias Kaehlcke To: Alan Stern Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Rob Herring , Frank Rowand , Michal Simek , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Douglas Anderson , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, Peter Chen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Boyd , Ravi Chandra Sadineni , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Bastien Nocera , Al Cooper , "Alexander A. Klimov" , Masahiro Yamada Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 2/5] USB: misc: Add onboard_usb_hub driver Message-ID: References: <20210511225223.550762-1-mka@chromium.org> <20210511155152.v10.2.I7c9a1f1d6ced41dd8310e8a03da666a32364e790@changeid> <20210518194511.GA1137841@rowland.harvard.edu> <20210519144356.GB1165692@rowland.harvard.edu> <20210520020521.GB1186755@rowland.harvard.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 06:41:23AM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: > On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 10:05:21PM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > > On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 04:07:17PM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: > > > On Wed, May 19, 2021 at 10:43:56AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote: > > > > On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 02:40:47PM -0700, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Could you also have a look at "[4/5] usb: host: xhci-plat: > > > > > Create platform device for onboard hubs in probe()" > > > > > (https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1425453/)? It's a > > > > > relatively short patch that creates the platform device for > > > > > the driver from xhci-plat as you suggested in the v4 > > > > > discussion. > > > > > > > > I'm not the maintainer for xhci-related drivers. > > > > > > > > However, there is at least one thing about this patch which looks > > > > suspicious: Adding the onboard_hub_dev pointer to struct usb_hcd instead > > > > of to struct xhci_plat_priv, where it would make a lot more sense. > > > > > > I can move it to struct usb_hcd if that's preferred > > > > Thinko: The patch already has it in struct usb_hcd. I suggested moving > > it to struct xhci_plat_priv. > > Ah, didn't actively recall to which struct I added it to, it has been a > while since I wrote that patch ;-) > Agreed that struct xhci_plat_priv is a better place. Or not, xhci_plat_priv is optional, which doesn't make it a good candidate for holding a field that could be used by any xHCI controller. Should I move the field to struct xhci_hcd instead?