Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030582AbWJ3Sxc (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Oct 2006 13:53:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030580AbWJ3Sxb (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Oct 2006 13:53:31 -0500 Received: from dd6424.kasserver.com ([85.13.131.51]:20164 "EHLO dd6424.kasserver.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030576AbWJ3Sxa (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Oct 2006 13:53:30 -0500 Message-ID: <45464A2C.5090402@feuerpokemon.de> Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 19:53:32 +0100 From: dragoran User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (X11/20061008) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org CC: netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: ipw3945? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 892 Lines: 18 The ipw3945 driver has been out for a while and is not yet upstream. It requires a binary only daemon to work, but I still see no reason not to merge it. Many wlan drivers require binary firmware anyway, so I don't see a reason not to merge it. I also have read this: http://lwn.net/Articles/205988/ (and the old thread on lkml/netdev) Can this be used to make the driver work without the daemon? It seems that the development of the driver has stopped since july, maybe because it never will get merged and intel decided to stop working on it? If this is true it could mean that feature intel wlan chips will end up with no linux drivers :( - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/