Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp1404899pxj; Fri, 21 May 2021 13:27:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwBQYqxHNTSnyXAy4fNylP1Xng4SUhjH3evZ2qkKx0WhEUqYtf5+v1tsZNNYF/3PSZ6DUrG X-Received: by 2002:a05:6602:164c:: with SMTP id y12mr695969iow.78.1621628824641; Fri, 21 May 2021 13:27:04 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1621628824; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=VkOgXJoBCepKuMCNk+qiC+oD9W/AnLowdx3NXvCJUn7qL51BS7M7nkSvnHv7sTpihC HJaC9hBpvUSlbrHGjD+gtjgOki/HwyJ/eif+nkco3gF86WNwyvfXO6AyKspLOG8aTSAG D/lJiFzqqVkjwymOLVEJpHypwiz27iqz89DhZD/b+ZRg9IXHxNQiws+CqCXMVxdtgUxQ a8ZseccTyrMb1tnWMM+hbGWigcXRIC44EL4ygtWeqqvZ5tFSiV5Il9sxWHOraEqLgAzY mQQm8tjOze3F59mcezjMlrbIN2kreQC9Ka8lee7F7UXnFm05pNiBKNIVE3r0kMuwApq/ J8Ng== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=6q0ikK0Mie3JrQ+cMfG9/RKVJO02t8l8yLC5xdmKsBw=; b=LlgAnToSNP3+i7QcqcLKffPdxAN8xeAGbmZzMPCfj0lc4TnXxFVoKsZgIDYbV1t27o PiQ9OZ3RTuk+YdST2/lsXVnukAiKMr66Fp6NnrUuhMAEQRI5dLmmp8ju2PM35n2Yx5+S zlJsFyrivADttdJPyZbkEwiqm12CEz6LpbPJhGsvJi2XBeK6I9qC6zDYJnItkvmOoc15 xKDXVhgp4rgzQEEl+RNC8h6BVh6w+VFrq1flEyS4nm8lZI419FYMuSoOaTFw7jasWAds 0pkt91YHdt7OpiLDsjzo4J4EO0Ttrdpe3aul1CcTMDAmFDT9hOD7besL9ubFoH3MJ6SX Gn7g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=qve62GhX; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l11si6790702jak.61.2021.05.21.13.26.51; Fri, 21 May 2021 13:27:04 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=qve62GhX; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S237540AbhEUSid (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 21 May 2021 14:38:33 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41602 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S235978AbhEUSib (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 May 2021 14:38:31 -0400 Received: from mail-yb1-xb33.google.com (mail-yb1-xb33.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b33]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED8BAC061574; Fri, 21 May 2021 11:37:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-yb1-xb33.google.com with SMTP id i4so28790846ybe.2; Fri, 21 May 2021 11:37:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=6q0ikK0Mie3JrQ+cMfG9/RKVJO02t8l8yLC5xdmKsBw=; b=qve62GhX7V7MgWo9gLUyHND9hmpf6NVdUoWsUKMisatS+WdIRwQP8g34HhH8XDj5Bf /ErZWMzTVJp68znHsoxmAxbyO0+fEpOu+nDRqh/DHlx8ToRx3DlcHiW+zVBlJP/kYmK2 cPlSiWKiYkfOY0C1jxPTsTB0nj/eqKAgLugHE26T1iAl770p8an96tyvB0kMwVhoZeTP ZvvMqAxy9sKqqXrapuOdeBr9tpVgnqMxWnocbsafBvYEP3bSY4zjr/s5CvT99Tb7pn8K 1YHm6jlNvpDw4nkdUta6PqIeJUiu1Cu1n9UiqL7uIuYKWGrN+BACZjuydCBjCzaS7jEM 5Nbg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=6q0ikK0Mie3JrQ+cMfG9/RKVJO02t8l8yLC5xdmKsBw=; b=S+qOb/R4V5zfd1YRN5xPv++aGb0eq8UYKSmnQo9frWLfywwNeVyrIGy/JnZHkw1qOG aOAXozE2jhtO33fvV47dDNmOqfJEqJD/zCmeM5B5/mPAWHXYVU9t3MfMIjBjBLHtaM9n y2OpEHordIJpjTNNt0Ybg/ewie+h2FNVnaUU02QOBOVIzhyAKRcvlDx0ZgeaUKjbfgAB hDSQIYJp0LQj5JFXXUT77EpaLitAMql7ETguHZdtjs9uWX3yCN3B+tg0bVgTggbFhZ+2 Zzfoa//jyvxlP+kLb1KwLw+wfFFyTR4jHnjDspo53NWV5VRsL04RDHg8NPMCxIL0ikKL fwSA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533riPq3PRgslxBTS65saz3EGhKfUKo2qENmsL7oAkaGPM018QNW QRvYqxn1j3ZA9Dp7aEu3zxTI0nD04VnB5+GIw2Q= X-Received: by 2002:a25:a26a:: with SMTP id b97mr17025060ybi.62.1621622227144; Fri, 21 May 2021 11:37:07 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210514192218.13022-1-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> <20210514192218.13022-16-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> In-Reply-To: From: "Lad, Prabhakar" Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 19:36:41 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/16] arm64: dts: renesas: Add initial DTSI for RZ/G2{L,LC} SoC's To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Lad Prabhakar , Rob Herring , Magnus Damm , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Jiri Slaby , Philipp Zabel , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux-Renesas , linux-clk , "open list:SERIAL DRIVERS" , Linux ARM , Biju Das Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Geert, Thank you for the review. On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 4:35 PM Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > Hi Prabhakar, > > On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 9:24 PM Lad Prabhakar > wrote: > > Add initial DTSI for RZ/G2{L,LC} SoC's. > > > > File structure: > > r9a07g044.dtsi => RZ/G2L family SoC common parts > > r9a07g044l.dtsi => Specific to RZ/G2L (R9A07G044L) SoC > > r9a07g044l1.dtsi => Specific to RZ/G2L (R9A07G044L single cortex A55) SoC > > r9a07g044l2.dtsi => Specific to RZ/G2L (R9A07G044L dual cortex A55) SoC > > > > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar > > Signed-off-by: Biju Das > > Thanks for your patch! > > > index 000000000000..c625d302f889 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044.dtsi > > @@ -0,0 +1,70 @@ > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > Do we want to use > > SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) > > for new DTS files? > This actually also applies to files. > > > +/* > > + * Device Tree Source for the RZ/G2L and RZ/G2LC common SoC parts > > + * > > + * Copyright (C) 2021 Renesas Electronics Corp. > > + */ > > + > > +#include > > +#include > > + > > +/ { > > + compatible = "renesas,r9a07g044"; > > + #address-cells = <2>; > > + #size-cells = <2>; > > + > > + extal_clk: extal { > > + compatible = "fixed-clock"; > > + #clock-cells = <0>; > > + /* This value must be overridden by the board */ > > + clock-frequency = <0>; > > + }; > > + > > + psci { > > + compatible = "arm,psci-1.0", "arm,psci-0.2"; > > + method = "smc"; > > + }; > > + > > + soc: soc { > > + compatible = "simple-bus"; > > + interrupt-parent = <&gic>; > > + #address-cells = <2>; > > + #size-cells = <2>; > > + ranges; > > + > > + scif0: serial@1004b800 { > > + compatible = "renesas,scif-r9a07g044"; > > + reg = <0 0x1004b800 0 0x400>; > > + interrupts = > > + , > > + , > > + , > > + , > > + ; > > "make dtbs_check > DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/renesas,scif.yaml": > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044l2-smarc.dt.yaml: > serial@1004b800: interrupts: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be > fixed: > [[0, 380, 4], [0, 382, 4], [0, 383, 4], [0, 381, 4], [0, 384, 4]] > is too long > Additional items are not allowed ([0, 382, 4], [0, 383, 4], [0, > 381, 4], [0, 384, 4] were unexpected) > Additional items are not allowed ([0, 384, 4] was unexpected) > [[0, 380, 4], [0, 382, 4], [0, 383, 4], [0, 381, 4], [0, 384, 4]] > is too short > > One interrupt is missing. According to the documentation, "tei" and > "dri" share an interrupt, so they should map to the same interrupt number. > Please add interrupt-names. > Agreed will do. > > + clocks = <&cpg CPG_MOD R9A07G044_CLK_SCIF0>; > > + clock-names = "fck"; > > + power-domains = <&cpg>; > > + resets = <&cpg R9A07G044_CLK_SCIF0>; > > + status = "disabled"; > > + }; > > + > > + devid: chipid@11020a04 { > > + compatible = "renesas,devid"; > > + reg = <0 0x11020a04 0 4>; > > + }; > > + > > + gic: interrupt-controller@11900000 { > > + compatible = "arm,gic-v3"; > > + #interrupt-cells = <3>; > > + #address-cells = <0>; > > + interrupt-controller; > > + reg = <0x0 0x11900000 0 0x40000>, > > + <0x0 0x11940000 0 0x60000>; > > + interrupts = ; > > + clocks = <&cpg CPG_MOD R9A07G044_CLK_GIC600>; > > + clock-names = "gic6000"; > > This looks like a weird name ;-) > In addition, it should be the consumer clock name, not the provider > clock name. > Agreed will rename that. > > + power-domains = <&cpg>; > > + resets = <&cpg R9A07G044_CLK_GIC600>; > > "make dtbs_check > DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/arm,gic-v3.yaml": > > arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044l2-smarc.dt.yaml: > interrupt-controller@11900000: 'clock-names', 'clocks', > 'power-domains', 'resets' do not match any of the regexes: > '^(msi-controller|gic-its|interrupt-controller)@[0-9a-f]+$', > '^gic-its@', '^interrupt-controller@[0-9a-f]+$', 'pinctrl-[0-9]+' > > These properties should be added to the GIC-v3 bindings, cfr. the normal > GIC bindings. > Agreed will do that. > > > + }; > > + }; > > +}; > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044l.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044l.dtsi > > new file mode 100644 > > index 000000000000..8d396b9100c1 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044l.dtsi > > @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > +/* > > + * Device Tree Source for the RZ/G2L common SoC parts > > + * > > + * Copyright (C) 2021 Renesas Electronics Corp. > > + */ > > + > > +/dts-v1/; > > +#include "r9a07g044.dtsi" > > + > > +&soc { > > + cpg: clock-controller@11010000 { > > + compatible = "renesas,r9a07g044l-cpg"; > > + reg = <0 0x11010000 0 0x10000>; > > + clocks = <&extal_clk>; > > + clock-names = "extal"; > > + #clock-cells = <2>; > > + #reset-cells = <1>; > > + #power-domain-cells = <0>; > > + }; > > As I think this is shared by RZ/G2L and RZ/G2LC, it belongs to > r9a07g044.dtsi. > As some of the IP blocks present on RZ/G2L aren't present in RZ/G2LC the clocks for the IP will be missing hence this is added to SoC specific dtsi. > > +}; > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044l1.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044l1.dtsi > > new file mode 100644 > > index 000000000000..44d4504e44c3 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044l1.dtsi > > @@ -0,0 +1,43 @@ > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > +/* > > + * Device Tree Source for the RZ/G2L R9A07G044L1 common parts > > + * > > + * Copyright (C) 2021 Renesas Electronics Corp. > > + */ > > + > > +/dts-v1/; > > +#include "r9a07g044l.dtsi" > > + > > +/ { > > + compatible = "renesas,r9a07g044l1"; > > + #address-cells = <2>; > > + #size-cells = <2>; > > #{address,size}-cells already defined in r9a07g044.dtsi. > Will drop that. > > + > > + cpus { > > + #address-cells = <1>; > > + #size-cells = <0>; > > + > > + a55_0: cpu@0 { > > + compatible = "arm,cortex-a55"; > > + reg = <0>; > > + device_type = "cpu"; > > + next-level-cache = <&L3_CA55>; > > + enable-method = "psci"; > > + }; > > + > > + L3_CA55: cache-controller-0 { > > + compatible = "cache"; > > + cache-unified; > > + cache-size = <0x40000>; > > + }; > > I think the first CPU core should be in the base r9a07g044.dtsi file. > OK will move that. > > + }; > > + > > + timer { > > + compatible = "arm,armv8-timer"; > > + interrupts-extended = > > + <&gic GIC_PPI 13 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(1) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>, > > + <&gic GIC_PPI 14 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(1) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>, > > + <&gic GIC_PPI 11 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(1) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>, > > + <&gic GIC_PPI 10 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(1) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>; > > Also in the base file, with interrupts-extended overridden where > needed? > OK will override here with the timer node moved from r9a07g044l2.dtsi to common SoC file. > > + }; > > +}; > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044l2.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044l2.dtsi > > new file mode 100644 > > index 000000000000..33bb35e1c369 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g044l2.dtsi > > @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@ > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 > > +/* > > + * Device Tree Source for the RZ/G2L R9A07G044L2 common parts > > + * > > + * Copyright (C) 2021 Renesas Electronics Corp. > > + */ > > + > > +/dts-v1/; > > +#include "r9a07g044l.dtsi" > > + > > +/ { > > + compatible = "renesas,r9a07g044l2"; > > + #address-cells = <2>; > > + #size-cells = <2>; > > + > > + cpus { > > + #address-cells = <1>; > > + #size-cells = <0>; > > + > > + cpu-map { > > + cluster0 { > > + core0 { > > + cpu = <&a55_0>; > > + }; > > + core1 { > > + cpu = <&a55_1>; > > + }; > > + }; > > + }; > > + > > + a55_0: cpu@0 { > > + compatible = "arm,cortex-a55"; > > + reg = <0>; > > + device_type = "cpu"; > > + next-level-cache = <&L3_CA55>; > > + enable-method = "psci"; > > + }; > > + > > + a55_1: cpu@1 { > > + compatible = "arm,cortex-a55"; > > + reg = <0x100>; > > + device_type = "cpu"; > > + next-level-cache = <&L3_CA55>; > > + enable-method = "psci"; > > + }; > > + > > + L3_CA55: cache-controller-0 { > > + compatible = "cache"; > > + cache-unified; > > + cache-size = <0x40000>; > > + }; > > I think (at least) the first CPU core should be in the base > r9a07g044.dtsi file. > Probably the second CPU core should be in the base file, too, and > removed by /delete-node/ in r9a07g044l1.dtsi? > Agreed will do that. > > + }; > > + > > + timer { > > + compatible = "arm,armv8-timer"; > > + interrupts-extended = > > + <&gic GIC_PPI 13 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(2) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>, > > + <&gic GIC_PPI 14 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(2) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>, > > + <&gic GIC_PPI 11 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(2) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>, > > + <&gic GIC_PPI 10 (GIC_CPU_MASK_SIMPLE(2) | IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW)>; > > + }; > > Also in the base file, with interrupts-extended overridden where > needed? > Will move this node to common SoC r9a07g044.dtsi file and override in r9a07g044l1.dtsi with CPU maks to 1. Cheers, Prabhakar > > +}; > > -- > > 2.17.1 > > > > > -- > Gr{oetje,eeting}s, > > Geert > > -- > Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org > > In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But > when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. > -- Linus Torvalds