Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 21 May 2021 22:16:44 +0200
From:   Ralf Schlatterbeck <rsc@runtux.com>
To:     Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
        linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Mirko Vogt <mirko-dev|linux@nanl.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] spi-sun6i: Fix chipselect/clock bug
Message-ID: <20210521201644.ksjgsjvdud2wblbe@runtux.com>
References: <20210520100656.rgkdexdvrddt3upy@runtux.com>
 <20210521173011.1c602682@slackpad.fritz.box>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210521173011.1c602682@slackpad.fritz.box>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 05:30:11PM +0100, Andre Przywara wrote:
> On Thu, 20 May 2021 12:06:56 +0200
> Ralf Schlatterbeck <rsc@runtux.com> wrote:
> So if I get your last email correctly, your intention was to make this
> Mirko's patch, which you just send?

Yes.

> In this case the authorship should stay with him (git commit --amend
> --author "..."), and you add your S-o-b (his first, your's next).
> If you use git format-patch & git send-email, it will take care of
> formatting this correctly (inserting a "From" line into the body).

I was using format-patch but editing the result. Would a 'Date' line in
the body also be OK? The patch is really from 2019...

I have it correctly in my git but was unaware that additional header
lines in the body are ok.

> One formatting thing below:
> >  	sun6i_spi_write(sspi, SUN6I_CLK_CTL_REG, reg);
> > +	/* Finally enable the bus - doing so before might raise SCK to HIGH */
> > +	sun6i_spi_write(sspi, SUN6I_GBL_CTL_REG,
> > +			sun6i_spi_read(sspi, SUN6I_GBL_CTL_REG)
> > +			| SUN6I_GBL_CTL_BUS_ENABLE);
> 
> The "|" on the new line looks a bit odd. What about you utilise "reg"
> here, as the other access do, to make this more readable?
> 	reg = sun6i_spi_read(...);
> 	reg |= ...
> 	sun6i_spi_write(..., reg);

I've fixed this and will resubmit.

Thanks,
Ralf