Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1422730AbWJ3WuT (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Oct 2006 17:50:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1422731AbWJ3WuT (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Oct 2006 17:50:19 -0500 Received: from colin.muc.de ([193.149.48.1]:20228 "EHLO mail.muc.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1422730AbWJ3WuS (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Oct 2006 17:50:18 -0500 Date: 30 Oct 2006 23:50:16 +0100 Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2006 23:50:16 +0100 From: Andi Kleen To: Zachary Amsden Cc: Andi Kleen , virtualization@lists.osdl.org, Andrew Morton , Chris Wright , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] Skip timer works.patch Message-ID: <20061030225016.GA95732@muc.de> References: <200610200009.k9K09MrS027558@zach-dev.vmware.com> <20061027145650.GA37582@muc.de> <45425976.3090508@vmware.com> <200610271416.12548.ak@suse.de> <4546669F.8020706@vmware.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4546669F.8020706@vmware.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1252 Lines: 36 On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 12:54:55PM -0800, Zachary Amsden wrote: > Andi Kleen wrote: > >no_timer_check. But it's only there on x86-64 in mainline - although there > >were some patches to add it to i386 too. > > > > I can rename to match the x86-64 name. I will do that in my tree. > >>That is what this patch is building towards, but the boot option is > >>"free", so why not? In the meantime, it helps non-paravirt kernels > >>booted in a VM. > >> > > > >Hmm, you meant they paniced before? If they just fail a few tests > >that is not particularly worrying (real hardware does that often too) > > > > Yes, they sometimes fail to boot, and the failure message used to ask us > to pester mingo. I still think we should figure that out automatically. Letting the Hypervisor pass magic boot options seems somehow unclean. But i suppose it will only work for the paravirtualized case, not for the case of kernel running "native" under a hypervisor I suppose? Or does that one not panic? -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/