Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp2313474pxj; Sat, 22 May 2021 18:55:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxDDI0P6QKVmlrO+tez/U0/sE7DJouchlB/yanUKeYoc8jj97CXlsPHYU0WvJkqIqeIabBO X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:22b4:: with SMTP id z20mr14446951jas.128.1621734956700; Sat, 22 May 2021 18:55:56 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1621734956; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=0axmctFiRIRiv5Z97wjbPExgi6yqyHo4PpmBr1iWTSeM3Z6LZznCRgzb0cwT5SCYx5 NwAhvCWENzMXtf0dn6aAfYShDhuSfJf4BYMgi1tK6dk2LUFMwRGy453ZAHO4/j17t50X n0jh/HsVnRLSFwwoVhHD6uiplTvVoQL/DKURQCzbnlMTbvJd0VrhrXubQyFCJ3uplvi6 d5WmW7BDUgLN3th4Tk4uTiHADE7WlwbzR0WiacJmt3zguH/KimpBcVb0CsnJXBRsqY8+ gakmIWQEWzm2GKN4jhzzKjE9ejvJ6/kmiG1BGvbOcNAjMUW/2ZIJW5f110DUptl1qsBw Dh4g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :message-id:to:from:cc:in-reply-to:subject:date:dkim-signature; bh=5UD89+Dq+ljLqV0JCbgY75yceYnvTgHB95RAXPbxXxI=; b=YOhANyFYlAQeDHXT7RGvP9cSjX8Z3Xxq7kKwzy78qlzcWjIFShlTcowodyneuwiw81 7y6wz2kVUxN7yc8yin0ZAJX7WQA4BC2II9P967gaHl1NVkTj0AD1tSvJwL4dRhYGP/bt ZrKH0mmwWwaDRoEu3q6LptkbpOO9awE1eTNmFCoSWGukdR7cCmvHTdiH98z1DabnS3fy aktj2m3TmZlWTMY7U7PsSTYVlXAL7H8MbtiC7wyKbJXv50XykMpz6t5JiRJLgV90zTyC 6LDdrjdj/jDJrSMZwQe9crsZR2YhzOgtA+i9a7RnRn0BLh9Gt/vC0S+YoTu8Uc7TIO1a Dk3Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@dabbelt-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=b6EUSj0x; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q7si9207343jaj.88.2021.05.22.18.55.44; Sat, 22 May 2021 18:55:56 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@dabbelt-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.s=20150623 header.b=b6EUSj0x; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231522AbhEWBuu (ORCPT + 99 others); Sat, 22 May 2021 21:50:50 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56646 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231494AbhEWBuu (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 May 2021 21:50:50 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-x62b.google.com (mail-pl1-x62b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 953A6C061574 for ; Sat, 22 May 2021 18:49:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x62b.google.com with SMTP id v13so12853577ple.9 for ; Sat, 22 May 2021 18:49:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dabbelt-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:subject:in-reply-to:cc:from:to:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=5UD89+Dq+ljLqV0JCbgY75yceYnvTgHB95RAXPbxXxI=; b=b6EUSj0xnyYYIK0EOFytl+TDjBinqIRyjzK43QrQDG3sSjwazKflYZjiS3E0obNU98 kfWYuarxsnbuVMGIZO+JQBteFpdb/dmsDI5zMrJZU/VRkvsJmtJJfA9zQRew4QSIf5JP cju+J9Qex53UYuizMPOtOZBdOJYIAlIXbCHRgKERjNYkZbqok7K+7O7Pe84NNFdeQdfT ZwrH9Jal0cDXTXOK5FUWwjr9NXlW6qeKmiWEoP5WaHOg+aX4h260fr2OcTL/detvSOeF 0LFuZed8L3bd2f/vxx9TpGpb3GUpv4h3YT1B+x3UvkyDTLMgx6h82TTtjIvvm7bXY7gc ar/w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:subject:in-reply-to:cc:from:to:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5UD89+Dq+ljLqV0JCbgY75yceYnvTgHB95RAXPbxXxI=; b=JyJfNkeDKByqz6zBEdvjQrRMKzJr2JOja4cLgmDIPa/rs5M77VEW29XJZ3sbhRNsfe koQbYGLzlmB8nDFpIjuObr+A6u6BBS2749Nb9Umd9huEHVAvu8Vic0V6YeQj/KiQS8m8 6nthmBnj2mDofFfINCFXaw6woA0wlyPn1OURBh/UJPpKLE+IShrpzYEi5lcjtNuxbadN AQPTSgl4TzYyNzVbjvt3kiQFhk9vngxOG3myrut3ySJm7FEe+7WhJorPfiKTlOwSqtAC 0CIeqo3HTZhIe0ULRhbY2WLxNPiO8t0rEI2NEjb8dowq3czUjlH96PounUk+uPjh8MiJ feGw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5314u5A+nFFsxVVwnd4QD2wAASPFqzrAu2MKBeTWQ87x5j9J9GF9 /5X2VsWmy7WWdP+QR020nO4EI4tLU5boVg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:6b08:b029:f5:ece8:e96f with SMTP id o8-20020a1709026b08b02900f5ece8e96fmr16611799plk.34.1621734562274; Sat, 22 May 2021 18:49:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (76-210-143-223.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net. [76.210.143.223]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c11sm6626477pjr.32.2021.05.22.18.49.21 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 22 May 2021 18:49:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 22 May 2021 18:49:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Original-Date: Sat, 22 May 2021 18:49:20 PDT (-0700) Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] riscv: add VMAP_STACK overflow detection In-Reply-To: <20210507092509.41346-1-tongtiangen@huawei.com> CC: Paul Walmsley , aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tongtiangen@huawei.com From: Palmer Dabbelt To: tongtiangen@huawei.com Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 (MHng) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 07 May 2021 02:25:09 PDT (-0700), tongtiangen@huawei.com wrote: > This patch adds stack overflow detection to riscv, usable when > CONFIG_VMAP_STACK=y. > > Overflow is detected in kernel exception entry(kernel/entry.S), if the kernel > stack is overflow and been detected, the overflow handler is invoked on a > per-cpu overflow stack. This approach preserves GPRs and the original exception > information. > > The overflow detect is performed before any attempt is made to access the stack > and the principle of stack overflow detection: kernel stacks are aligned to > double their size, enabling overflow to be detected with a single bit test. For > example, a 16K stack is aligned to 32K, ensuring that bit 14 of the SP must be > zero. On an overflow (or underflow), this bit is flipped. Thus, overflow (of > less than the size of the stack) can be detected by testing whether this bit is > set. > > This gives us a useful error message on stack overflow, as can be trigger with > the LKDTM overflow test: > > [ 388.053267] lkdtm: Performing direct entry EXHAUST_STACK > [ 388.053663] lkdtm: Calling function with 1024 frame size to depth 32 ... > [ 388.054016] lkdtm: loop 32/32 ... > [ 388.054186] lkdtm: loop 31/32 ... > [ 388.054491] lkdtm: loop 30/32 ... > [ 388.054672] lkdtm: loop 29/32 ... > [ 388.054859] lkdtm: loop 28/32 ... > [ 388.055010] lkdtm: loop 27/32 ... > [ 388.055163] lkdtm: loop 26/32 ... > [ 388.055309] lkdtm: loop 25/32 ... > [ 388.055481] lkdtm: loop 24/32 ... > [ 388.055653] lkdtm: loop 23/32 ... > [ 388.055837] lkdtm: loop 22/32 ... > [ 388.056015] lkdtm: loop 21/32 ... > [ 388.056188] lkdtm: loop 20/32 ... > [ 388.058145] Insufficient stack space to handle exception! > [ 388.058153] Task stack: [0xffffffd014260000..0xffffffd014264000] > [ 388.058160] Overflow stack: [0xffffffe1f8d2c220..0xffffffe1f8d2d220] > [ 388.058168] CPU: 0 PID: 89 Comm: bash Not tainted 5.12.0-rc8-dirty #90 > [ 388.058175] Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT) > [ 388.058187] epc : number+0x32/0x2c0 > [ 388.058247] ra : vsnprintf+0x2ae/0x3f0 > [ 388.058255] epc : ffffffe0002d38f6 ra : ffffffe0002d814e sp : ffffffd01425ffc0 > [ 388.058263] gp : ffffffe0012e4010 tp : ffffffe08014da00 t0 : ffffffd0142606e8 > [ 388.058271] t1 : 0000000000000000 t2 : 0000000000000000 s0 : ffffffd014260070 > [ 388.058303] s1 : ffffffd014260158 a0 : ffffffd01426015e a1 : ffffffd014260158 > [ 388.058311] a2 : 0000000000000013 a3 : ffff0a01ffffff10 a4 : ffffffe000c398e0 > [ 388.058319] a5 : 511b02ec65f3e300 a6 : 0000000000a1749a a7 : 0000000000000000 > [ 388.058327] s2 : ffffffff000000ff s3 : 00000000ffff0a01 s4 : ffffffe0012e50a8 > [ 388.058335] s5 : 0000000000ffff0a s6 : ffffffe0012e50a8 s7 : ffffffe000da1cc0 > [ 388.058343] s8 : ffffffffffffffff s9 : ffffffd0142602b0 s10: ffffffd0142602a8 > [ 388.058351] s11: ffffffd01426015e t3 : 00000000000f0000 t4 : ffffffffffffffff > [ 388.058359] t5 : 000000000000002f t6 : ffffffd014260158 > [ 388.058366] status: 0000000000000100 badaddr: ffffffd01425fff8 cause: 000000000000000f > [ 388.058374] Kernel panic - not syncing: Kernel stack overflow > [ 388.058381] CPU: 0 PID: 89 Comm: bash Not tainted 5.12.0-rc8-dirty #90 > [ 388.058387] Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT) > [ 388.058393] Call Trace: > [ 388.058400] [] walk_stackframe+0x0/0xce > [ 388.058406] [] dump_backtrace+0x38/0x46 > [ 388.058412] [] show_stack+0x10/0x18 > [ 388.058418] [] dump_stack+0x74/0x8e > [ 388.058424] [] panic+0xfc/0x2b2 > [ 388.058430] [] print_trace_address+0x0/0x24 > [ 388.058436] [] vsnprintf+0x2ae/0x3f0 > [ 388.058956] SMP: stopping secondary CPUs > > Signed-off-by: Tong Tiangen > --- > arch/riscv/Kconfig | 1 + > arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h | 15 ++++ > arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S | 108 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c | 35 +++++++++ > 4 files changed, 159 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig > index 4515a10c5d22..587f001e84f4 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig > @@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ config RISCV > select HAVE_ARCH_MMAP_RND_BITS if MMU > select HAVE_ARCH_SECCOMP_FILTER > select HAVE_ARCH_TRACEHOOK > + select HAVE_ARCH_VMAP_STACK > select HAVE_ASM_MODVERSIONS > select HAVE_CONTEXT_TRACKING > select HAVE_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h > index 0e549a3089b3..60da0dcacf14 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/thread_info.h > @@ -19,6 +19,21 @@ > #endif > #define THREAD_SIZE (PAGE_SIZE << THREAD_SIZE_ORDER) > > +/* > + * By aligning VMAP'd stacks to 2 * THREAD_SIZE, we can detect overflow by > + * checking sp & (1 << THREAD_SHIFT), which we can do cheaply in the entry > + * assembly. > + */ > +#ifdef CONFIG_VMAP_STACK > +#define THREAD_ALIGN (2 * THREAD_SIZE) > +#else > +#define THREAD_ALIGN THREAD_SIZE > +#endif > + > +#define THREAD_SHIFT (PAGE_SHIFT + THREAD_SIZE_ORDER) > +#define OVERFLOW_STACK_SIZE SZ_4K > +#define SHADOW_OVERFLOW_STACK_SIZE (1024) > + > #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ > > #include > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S b/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S > index 83095faa680e..deadf4000b86 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S > @@ -29,6 +29,15 @@ ENTRY(handle_exception) > _restore_kernel_tpsp: > csrr tp, CSR_SCRATCH > REG_S sp, TASK_TI_KERNEL_SP(tp) > + > +#ifdef CONFIG_VMAP_STACK > + addi sp, sp, -(PT_SIZE_ON_STACK) > + srli sp, sp, THREAD_SHIFT > + andi sp, sp, 0x1 > + bnez sp, handle_kernel_stack_overflow > + REG_L sp, TASK_TI_KERNEL_SP(tp) > +#endif > + > _save_context: > REG_S sp, TASK_TI_USER_SP(tp) > REG_L sp, TASK_TI_KERNEL_SP(tp) > @@ -375,6 +384,105 @@ handle_syscall_trace_exit: > call do_syscall_trace_exit > j ret_from_exception > > +#ifdef CONFIG_VMAP_STACK > +handle_kernel_stack_overflow: > + la sp, shadow_stack > + addi sp, sp, SHADOW_OVERFLOW_STACK_SIZE > + > + //save caller register to shadow stack > + addi sp, sp, -(PT_SIZE_ON_STACK) > + REG_S x1, PT_RA(sp) > + REG_S x5, PT_T0(sp) > + REG_S x6, PT_T1(sp) > + REG_S x7, PT_T2(sp) > + REG_S x10, PT_A0(sp) > + REG_S x11, PT_A1(sp) > + REG_S x12, PT_A2(sp) > + REG_S x13, PT_A3(sp) > + REG_S x14, PT_A4(sp) > + REG_S x15, PT_A5(sp) > + REG_S x16, PT_A6(sp) > + REG_S x17, PT_A7(sp) > + REG_S x28, PT_T3(sp) > + REG_S x29, PT_T4(sp) > + REG_S x30, PT_T5(sp) > + REG_S x31, PT_T6(sp) > + > + la ra, restore_caller_reg > + tail get_overflow_stack > + > +restore_caller_reg: > + //save per-cpu overflow stack > + sd a0, -8(sp) > + //restore caller register from shadow_stack > + REG_L x1, PT_RA(sp) > + REG_L x5, PT_T0(sp) > + REG_L x6, PT_T1(sp) > + REG_L x7, PT_T2(sp) > + REG_L x10, PT_A0(sp) > + REG_L x11, PT_A1(sp) > + REG_L x12, PT_A2(sp) > + REG_L x13, PT_A3(sp) > + REG_L x14, PT_A4(sp) > + REG_L x15, PT_A5(sp) > + REG_L x16, PT_A6(sp) > + REG_L x17, PT_A7(sp) > + REG_L x28, PT_T3(sp) > + REG_L x29, PT_T4(sp) > + REG_L x30, PT_T5(sp) > + REG_L x31, PT_T6(sp) > + > + //load per-cpu overflow stack > + ld sp, -8(sp) > + addi sp, sp, -(PT_SIZE_ON_STACK) > + > + //save context to overflow stack > + REG_S x1, PT_RA(sp) > + REG_S x3, PT_GP(sp) > + REG_S x5, PT_T0(sp) > + REG_S x6, PT_T1(sp) > + REG_S x7, PT_T2(sp) > + REG_S x8, PT_S0(sp) > + REG_S x9, PT_S1(sp) > + REG_S x10, PT_A0(sp) > + REG_S x11, PT_A1(sp) > + REG_S x12, PT_A2(sp) > + REG_S x13, PT_A3(sp) > + REG_S x14, PT_A4(sp) > + REG_S x15, PT_A5(sp) > + REG_S x16, PT_A6(sp) > + REG_S x17, PT_A7(sp) > + REG_S x18, PT_S2(sp) > + REG_S x19, PT_S3(sp) > + REG_S x20, PT_S4(sp) > + REG_S x21, PT_S5(sp) > + REG_S x22, PT_S6(sp) > + REG_S x23, PT_S7(sp) > + REG_S x24, PT_S8(sp) > + REG_S x25, PT_S9(sp) > + REG_S x26, PT_S10(sp) > + REG_S x27, PT_S11(sp) > + REG_S x28, PT_T3(sp) > + REG_S x29, PT_T4(sp) > + REG_S x30, PT_T5(sp) > + REG_S x31, PT_T6(sp) > + > + REG_L s0, TASK_TI_KERNEL_SP(tp) > + csrr s1, CSR_STATUS > + csrr s2, CSR_EPC > + csrr s3, CSR_TVAL > + csrr s4, CSR_CAUSE > + csrr s5, CSR_SCRATCH > + REG_S s0, PT_SP(sp) > + REG_S s1, PT_STATUS(sp) > + REG_S s2, PT_EPC(sp) > + REG_S s3, PT_BADADDR(sp) > + REG_S s4, PT_CAUSE(sp) > + REG_S s5, PT_TP(sp) > + move a0, sp > + tail handle_bad_stack > +#endif > + > END(handle_exception) > > ENTRY(ret_from_fork) > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c > index 1357abf79570..ff8033b9fdd6 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c > @@ -200,3 +200,38 @@ int is_valid_bugaddr(unsigned long pc) > void trap_init(void) > { > } > + > +#ifdef CONFIG_VMAP_STACK > +DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long [OVERFLOW_STACK_SIZE/sizeof(long)], overflow_stack) > + __aligned(16); > +/* > + * shadow stack, handled_ kernel_ stack_ overflow(in kernel/entry.S) is used > + * to get per-cpu overflow stack(get_overflow_stack). > + */ > +long shadow_stack[SHADOW_OVERFLOW_STACK_SIZE/sizeof(long)]; > +asmlinkage unsigned long get_overflow_stack(void) > +{ > + return (unsigned long)this_cpu_ptr(overflow_stack) + > + OVERFLOW_STACK_SIZE; > +} > + > +asmlinkage void handle_bad_stack(struct pt_regs *regs) > +{ > + unsigned long tsk_stk = (unsigned long)current->stack; > + unsigned long ovf_stk = (unsigned long)this_cpu_ptr(overflow_stack); > + > + console_verbose(); > + > + pr_emerg("Insufficient stack space to handle exception!\n"); > + pr_emerg("Task stack: [0x%016lx..0x%016lx]\n", > + tsk_stk, tsk_stk + THREAD_SIZE); > + pr_emerg("Overflow stack: [0x%016lx..0x%016lx]\n", > + ovf_stk, ovf_stk + OVERFLOW_STACK_SIZE); > + > + __show_regs(regs); > + panic("Kernel stack overflow"); > + > + for (;;) > + wait_for_interrupt(); > +} > +#endif This LGTM. It seems good enough to take, I'm not sure why this is an RFC?