Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp2780216pxj; Sun, 23 May 2021 10:32:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzE6N9oUeTyGHaXqPHizSWp/wPaIOTKi3zWbUnPRAbRT7Dh+8fbs+AIfrCtR9wGfL5K+66n X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:2507:: with SMTP id v7mr19382205jat.96.1621791159042; Sun, 23 May 2021 10:32:39 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1621791159; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=BUzTjifabiP66hLSq4If10JMZYd5kji5TF0Hdx3WE+5BFTGxu4dq/pNjL1NxnLek6W rxhwIfF2Af+LE09YQ2/wUu645hvvhdaHX3EdfspQ0OeVhXL6bv0MiJNv2hswSY07+fO3 oG04kmaLpQPa3y6/QO18smaU9s1cOMf3wEtyK3TQen7PoCi9n5iTY52VyyyILLNsoR/S /nM8e0LK0SWMG2eVLNS1Uk+IS06OrO1/Djw/SpB5+SAqNE/0nKiwVgGP1vra+qo2M0bP NrmNFYTSGJYlHilPTLuuCt0wT9XLZIz0UNBTmUTOUKSx9xWVmw+5c7zSNFnr3eogL4YT kz2A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=SVw9YDxlfb3Wp0TqyOy5TxaXqzpo0DFrHAeFXsKSb9Q=; b=ZZkaj+4XVxq3xZbZAZss+3WW2jLcHQ9Vsmx5lgviXxBbq6HwHb1ZDHMA9ezQEk32p4 M7oXJN0oNhQgShsrMQYnkP9gh33jVCwXYCqTjXkP5KYpXAeJQDIPjp4pin5SwkWsj/NL HOgkdFE/VPXHtSmDLick2q8FrU4FHJ8xv9y63PwyRF2DOWLVgVMOb+wh3w7sy5ppVwSq XlBVB74DdnVftWM233K8Cwp0F+jZtYbt34yYOsCXbzdYa+kT0a5ldZlwqIdVXayXcWXy DjCjNxZH64Ssdkrf30k5lcZCuNNl32OBG1h5zOD2FVe0ENu8NAFXEtF2StYomebaW5HL 1OJg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@geanix.com header.s=first header.b="Ik/KaQWH"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=geanix.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b27si11166720jaq.105.2021.05.23.10.32.26; Sun, 23 May 2021 10:32:39 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@geanix.com header.s=first header.b="Ik/KaQWH"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=geanix.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231932AbhEWRch (ORCPT + 99 others); Sun, 23 May 2021 13:32:37 -0400 Received: from first.geanix.com ([116.203.34.67]:42102 "EHLO first.geanix.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231852AbhEWRcg (ORCPT ); Sun, 23 May 2021 13:32:36 -0400 Received: from [192.168.16.66] (unknown [185.233.254.173]) by first.geanix.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B500A464730; Sun, 23 May 2021 17:31:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=geanix.com; s=first; t=1621791065; bh=ZCkIWffbhhMdbIhqJK+g931zNirJIa1Z9QiPSFtiFPY=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=Ik/KaQWHpQnhItRn4vNI0ok45iotk6FxWeO1G1pcVniF5hbv652P/PVTQbCaMBj55 YpbIOv5Obf0TvLmDKVojmxonrCv/JaKW6kgvkrmO5roN+U1kPtNdnqAtbz8cYPYm9J bA8HSQ08NKDh0py7fzw78+DBH805rwo4WnA1VMxUZPOhkHkkrAUYaUOmTitsKrmCP+ uhziJogjwspUuQjuKd8qYPfpunNkNZNUxM6BZecpWaTueXbOkbcUQF9Vdj5p6KDW1Z nShKvobeMRZFJon6UuC4F6ZP4m/lC+97tj17y1vEEG1dpLuLhKaXbvO1M55gtLgylY cHZxt9O5ayMfg== Subject: Re: [RESEND]: Kernel 4.14: UBIFS+SQUASHFS: Device fails to boot after flashing rootfs volume To: Pintu Agarwal , Phillip Lougher Cc: open list , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org References: <1762403920.6716767.1621029029246@webmail.123-reg.co.uk> <486335206.6969995.1621485014357@webmail.123-reg.co.uk> From: Sean Nyekjaer Message-ID: <1339b24a-b5a5-5c73-7de0-9541455b66af@geanix.com> Date: Sun, 23 May 2021 19:31:04 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=4.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,NICE_REPLY_A, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=disabled version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on 93bd6fdb21b5 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 23/05/2021 18.44, Pintu Agarwal wrote: > On Thu, 20 May 2021 at 10:00, Phillip Lougher wrote: >> > >> Then run it on your Squashfs image >> >> % unsquashfs >> >> If the image is uncorrupted, it will unpack the image into >> "squashfs-root". If it is corrupted it will give error >> messages. >> > I have tried this and it seems with unsquashfs I am able to > successfully extract it to "squashfs-root" folder. > >> I have not used the MTD subsystem for more than 13 years, and so >> this is best answered on linux-mtd. > > Yes, I have already included the linux-mtd list here. > Maybe MTD folks can share their opinion as well.... > That is the reason I have changed the subject as well. > >> You appear to be running busybox, and this has both support for >> "dd" and the "md5sum" checksum program. >> >> So do this >> >> % dd if= of=img bs=1 count= >> >> Where is the size of the Squashfs image reported >> by "ls -l" or "stat". You need to get the exact byte count >> right, otherwise the resultant checksum won't be right. >> >> Then run md5sum on the extracted "img" file. >> >> % md5sum img >> >> This will produce a checksum. >> >> You can then compare that with the result of "md5sum" on your >> original Squashfs image before flashing (produced on the host >> or the target). >> >> If the checksums differ then it is corrupted. >> > I have also tried that and it seems the checksum exactly matches. > $ md5sum system.squash > d301016207cc5782d1634259a5c597f9 ./system.squash > > On the device: > /data/pintu # dd if=/dev/ubi0_0 of=squash_rootfs.img bs=1K count=48476 > 48476+0 records in > 48476+0 records out > 49639424 bytes (47.3MB) copied, 26.406276 seconds, 1.8MB/s > [12001.375255] dd (2392) used greatest stack depth: 4208 bytes left > > /data/pintu # md5sum squash_rootfs.img > d301016207cc5782d1634259a5c597f9 squash_rootfs.img > > So, it seems there is no problem with either the original image > (unsquashfs) as well as the checksum. > > Then what else could be the suspect/issue ? > If you have any further inputs please share your thoughts. > > This is the kernel command line we are using: > [ 0.000000] Kernel command line: ro rootwait > console=ttyMSM0,115200,n8 androidboot.hardware=qcom > msm_rtb.filter=0x237 androidboot.console=ttyMSM0 > lpm_levels.sleep_disabled=1 firmware_class.path=/lib/firmware/updates > service_locator.enable=1 net.ifnames=0 rootfstype=squashfs > root=/dev/ubiblock0_0 ubi.mtd=30 ubi.block=0,0 > > These are few more points to be noted: > a) With squashfs we are getting below error: > [ 4.603156] squashfs: SQUASHFS error: unable to read xattr id index table > [...] > [ 4.980519] Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root > fs on unknown-block(254,0) > > b) With ubifs (without squashfs) we are getting below error: > [ 4.712458] UBIFS (ubi0:0): UBIFS: mounted UBI device 0, volume 0, > name "rootfs", R/O mode > [...] > UBIFS error (ubi0:0 pid 1): ubifs_read_node: bad node type (255 but expected 9) > UBIFS error (ubi0:0 pid 1): ubifs_read_node: bad node at LEB > 336:250560, LEB mapping status 1 > Not a node, first 24 bytes: > 00000000: ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff > ff ff ff ff > > c) While flashing "usrfs" volume (ubi0_1) there is no issue and device > boots successfully. > > d) This issue is happening only after flashing rootfs volume (ubi0_0) > and rebooting the device. > > e) We are using "uefi" and fastboot mechanism to flash the volumes. Are you writing the squashfs into the ubi block device with uefi/fastboot? > > f) Next I wanted to check the read-only UBI volume flashing mechanism > within the Kernel itself. > Is there a way to try a read-only "rootfs" (squashfs type) ubi volume > flashing mechanism from the Linux command prompt ? > Or, what are the other ways to verify UBI volume flashing in Linux ? > > g) I wanted to root-cause, if there is any problem in our UBI flashing > logic, or there's something missing on the Linux/Kernel side (squashfs > or ubifs) or the way we configure the system. > > Thanks, > Pintu > Have you had it to work? Or is this a new project? If you had it to work, i would start bisecting... /Sean