Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp3203977pxj; Mon, 24 May 2021 00:51:09 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyqHCetQR88HMJRVZc+/TzWN/YXFt/fk/tvJ/0lXK9LTQo9Vxf4K0VpjzDOjML+2oc5HAcJ X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:b84b:: with SMTP id ga11mr9699189ejb.243.1621842669483; Mon, 24 May 2021 00:51:09 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1621842669; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=u2Vt7Mt9ivg5ow0DbMJDCVnYhCoMsFMtUUn9MoBmC+exhLOjtczolra5EUxQhvlWIr s3PIBpL3ZrwXjoPM+bx6a1CaGThmACnduwLzSlKB3hMnotc78ne82O14zogKOHugG4b9 OF8zRgWy8NzsZTYTgwTp39INPU2OQV8ysht9CQkDtFCnbAwmvVinHYdNyCArXK+3XtBK YLrVf7yBz0X2f/6gbYIeb66DvGRtQIp3aUtgjbqSKdsZ+tUzNpi01dRC2+WTPS2NATBF RaCuAlQg4qwRPUrbyQdKYJe4Vz2wKzU1NefkrEnLDBEyQAd4gfaoVI+6+KUa5j2tXJXD 1trA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=7TQVEWhmRQ6cumP+zJm1cd6xIHLuipPnV4vmfMxJf9E=; b=uKqcvFzfFpocL5gzWK5rpEQl+8QlnTGkNeEeEOvF9RygL3swHPxbd1pwVSOkRlVmMA uwwtPnKGwcTfMFZ9sBDt7XUAchKKoegYbD2Gd+G4GX/CglH0cSCidYHmDx661wXldxSZ 2vUUo8YZNOIB02w0EcRJ+enEPk35nkYIojxYOddPGE1slG+mTo7/Tj4NvP/HvjV+2Try ndKXRjIwaIfYMHeVRbTCU8lb4Ah7Xcm90dHxLLpX/vXPF7p0cY9OL/SeK1z7asHXgLxV 0bfonI8GgS906mglW1V0iEeIg58nt63MF5gbI2LH0SfP2hSN/t3VKbe+mo3gHRCzl+gC dOBQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=hiFuS4gy; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id au2si11701340ejc.88.2021.05.24.00.50.46; Mon, 24 May 2021 00:51:09 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=hiFuS4gy; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232306AbhEXHvY (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 24 May 2021 03:51:24 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54736 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232099AbhEXHvX (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 May 2021 03:51:23 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x1031.google.com (mail-pj1-x1031.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1031]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9B1AC061574; Mon, 24 May 2021 00:49:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x1031.google.com with SMTP id k5so14363540pjj.1; Mon, 24 May 2021 00:49:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=7TQVEWhmRQ6cumP+zJm1cd6xIHLuipPnV4vmfMxJf9E=; b=hiFuS4gy9uJ1Vrdkb8ofyQij8g7UJrPeWf0FxfZo+Qt5Wp4evaOrkw+K4oNcw58YjF d/4W97xt3/SC+wCCSWJ62beXcRRZp5o7HE19W4pz09irN/FLOxex4MmGpmb/I2q1BGTV Vtptnobs1CU6PEDSy7zMimWZ44m31YpJcAUlc6t7baCH1jcndVD5nYujsEAYLrGTCZ4S nPcPuKobW763XUdCEmcfH086hFz/mkPUbctFu7JOOHOfM8xxwd9bBhUWD+NuZuX+Wm60 C/ozZc6rMBG4pbiTOk1XuBQAgdnDetlNXHDNyn+pZ9EqN27YhouPZ5a9nnwwuUSpJDn4 xcYw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=7TQVEWhmRQ6cumP+zJm1cd6xIHLuipPnV4vmfMxJf9E=; b=A42Uu4rFn0fNXeaqoQ1DMWaPOwxt31cA7Ns3CJiRFsxofEfUJrZ7sjb2kPDtG0idAO LXADB2BFrTiIBRqbAI/3sihL4ki9DO10MIfWytNnbzbPl1xs2D18Mfs6+jNINbGWtG5U PnahuTdsFgo2zjv8FD4xTDzOYgmjohldMFuB38NmKaRTcng1GXO2i7PXajk/3kuN+V9A sD2bA1sf3DfENUkVYmX/+X2OI/l3I6BcwDMGrZwEvSBjY98Xk6IgoQNGE6ZNislhT/xg HBG3NrzcrQ/M1hnYKJE+6kRDx5tuaHvJKVMa2QZL8cq8Kl9YWW2ba/hBgihSOzXEMGGa CyGQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531giygp8wsnL62d4OhVnUSAq86r6nN9v9QnHAmfNnW5llVrhMHq 4qpCi04p2FyyeoFr+vYYDWF+MngRPRlnMxh5aGc= X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:bf48:b029:fa:9401:cda8 with SMTP id u8-20020a170902bf48b02900fa9401cda8mr2799553pls.0.1621842594222; Mon, 24 May 2021 00:49:54 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <7b5235057380d5997d8f91e70bc8782137c726e1.camel@svanheule.net> In-Reply-To: <7b5235057380d5997d8f91e70bc8782137c726e1.camel@svanheule.net> From: Andy Shevchenko Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 10:49:38 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] mfd: Add RTL8231 core device To: Sander Vanheule Cc: Pavel Machek , Rob Herring , Lee Jones , Mark Brown , Greg Kroah-Hartman , "Rafael J . Wysocki" , Michael Walle , Linus Walleij , Bartosz Golaszewski , Linux LED Subsystem , devicetree , "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" , Andrew Lunn , Linux Kernel Mailing List , kernel test robot Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 12:28 AM Sander Vanheule wrote: > On Tue, 2021-05-18 at 00:18 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 10:28 PM Sander Vanheule wrote: > > > > > > The RTL8231 is implemented as an MDIO device, and provides a regmap > > > interface for register access by the core and child devices. > > > > > > The chip can also be a device on an SMI bus, an I2C-like bus by Realtek. > > > Since kernel support for SMI is limited, and no real-world SMI > > > implementations have been encountered for this device, this is currently > > > unimplemented. The use of the regmap interface should make any future > > > support relatively straightforward. > > > > > > After reset, all pins are muxed to GPIO inputs before the pin drivers > > > are enabled. This is done to prevent accidental system resets, when a > > > pin is connected to the parent SoC's reset line. > > > > > [missing MDIO_BUS dependency, provided via REGMAP_MDIO] > > > Reported-by: kernel test robot > > > > What is the culprit? Shouldn't this have a Fixes tag? > > But it doesn't actually fix an issue created by an existing commit, just > something that was wrong in the first version of the patch. Then why is it in the tag block? If you want to give a credit to LKP, do it in the comments block (after '---' cutter line). > This patch is not > dedicated to fixing that single issue though, it's just a part of it. Hence the > note above the Reported-by tag. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko