Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <cover.1621279162.git.sander@svanheule.net> <f1ca940216c0accfc804afee2dbe46d260d890ae.1621279162.git.sander@svanheule.net>
 <CAHp75Vc5a4PsHsJ2sNsRNT7BaBJ=Kxb+KKM7x7jWeRdOS8WfnQ@mail.gmail.com> <33eb043f2ef9d81bbe26876a1c73859f56a8abd9.camel@svanheule.net>
In-Reply-To: <33eb043f2ef9d81bbe26876a1c73859f56a8abd9.camel@svanheule.net>
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 24 May 2021 10:55:02 +0300
Message-ID: <CAHp75VeVq31q6U+fXGi=ME0Bx5D7V+KiE70JZB4MLy+SbEJP4A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] mfd: Add RTL8231 core device
To:     Sander Vanheule <sander@svanheule.net>
Cc:     Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
        Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
        Linux LED Subsystem <linux-leds@vger.kernel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 10:50 AM Sander Vanheule <sander@svanheule.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-05-18 at 00:18 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 10:28 PM Sander Vanheule <sander@svanheule.net> wrote:
> > > +       err = regmap_read(map, RTL8231_REG_FUNC1, &v);
> >
> > > +       ready_code = FIELD_GET(RTL8231_FUNC1_READY_CODE_MASK, v);
> >
> > If we got an error why we need a read_core, what for?
>
> The chip has a static 5-bit field in register 0x01, called READY_CODE according
> to the datasheet. If a device is present, and a read from register 0x01
> succeeds, I still check that this field has the correct value. For the RTL8231,
> it should return 0x37. If this isn't the case, I assume this isn't an RTL8231,
> so the driver probe stops and returns an error value.

Right. And why do you get ready_code if you know that there is an error?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko