Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To:     Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
        Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com>,
        linux-power@fi.rohmeurope.com, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] regulator: bd70528: Fix off-by-one for buck123 .n_voltages setting
Date:   Mon, 24 May 2021 12:59:50 +0100
Message-Id: <162185754506.49496.15880289485799578744.b4-ty@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20210523071045.2168904-1-axel.lin@ingics.com>
References: <20210523071045.2168904-1-axel.lin@ingics.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On Sun, 23 May 2021 15:10:44 +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
> The valid selectors for bd70528 bucks are 0 ~ 0xf, so the .n_voltages
> should be 16 (0x10). Use 0x10 to make it consistent with BD70528_LDO_VOLTS.
> Also remove redundant defines for BD70528_BUCK_VOLTS.

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/2] regulator: bd70528: Fix off-by-one for buck123 .n_voltages setting
      commit: 0514582a1a5b4ac1a3fd64792826d392d7ae9ddc
[2/2] regulator: bd71828: Fix .n_voltages settings
      commit: 4c668630bf8ea90a041fc69c9984486e0f56682d

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark