Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp3356915pxj; Mon, 24 May 2021 05:02:31 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz/yqjQM0ixtZNIY9IedLW+mixjZ8TtDIHzHH2NcBO+Q2L6xplrksWMvX+V2cuDSMaeY39B X-Received: by 2002:a6b:d103:: with SMTP id l3mr13180120iob.159.1621857750926; Mon, 24 May 2021 05:02:30 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1621857750; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ZTaq5HHf33ri7BbywSPLSgI5fqz7XnKZUgnH9DbWuDiNs8J0WzcSAvgcbMchozSDrb O6ePGBDgjsVifrKUDtBbgBhVe3chTkMMPb2Vo9W3MbEI2RBfAst1OR2nc7tS7MQcFLo7 QtHlMdeABHJHQYY+kol+wzGWGunrGVTzSVs9KABbZtbvYEz7LASqvf8DzRQHaPiWOtpx yN+8dBt3MFtk7br6TpRkOv8z+odUGOfB4n0Btdlym/dWO+SIjWLQCX+ZETTyoFpz8J42 Mmg1/aVXNnCnRwOghUgebMzBYCOT0tsZY/GEv2/KyHc29kQR4L3UYq4elUqVthOcrVE6 BqVQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature :dkim-signature; bh=9b68iKsk8DPJHoYxXOYWybMr7+TfDaS+j0bppFnZpLo=; b=LfQwJ0pYYby5i0v0yGNf/xwlszjMqPFUUuK6rLzdsNmyfNwAPsNX2kCDb/s+Gtau2f gwrC6wHf4T4R/UYLa994v0KBE1s79BmGsyzdc51TjOCS0MjgsHYIbosTle5+eWU+KuV5 cSeP3av5DC86GIXNQuGbQYN2CrxPdOqPZd6Zx2X/s9pn1/D5jUEWJ9JI/T1DENlGQJLb gSRuxMo0C9ceoS0aRkhc061TOEUsaDVbNEAKQkFYPLpV4YG+ujkRSJLtgRuqbV0HxYHB dmhjC1ASLFqKsyVYzM1Lsmh+Jb6b6Z+eMkwmvhN1i3BokWXTD9Ne9cHQNPxHo7VQjf5O UkMQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kroah.com header.s=fm3 header.b=aYxbuGTf; dkim=pass header.i=@messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=EpqzaZa8; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t8si11858913ioh.32.2021.05.24.05.02.17; Mon, 24 May 2021 05:02:30 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kroah.com header.s=fm3 header.b=aYxbuGTf; dkim=pass header.i=@messagingengine.com header.s=fm2 header.b=EpqzaZa8; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232802AbhEXMCy (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 24 May 2021 08:02:54 -0400 Received: from new4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.230]:44305 "EHLO new4-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232819AbhEXMCY (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 May 2021 08:02:24 -0400 Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailnew.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5796F58270C; Mon, 24 May 2021 08:00:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 24 May 2021 08:00:56 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kroah.com; h= date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:in-reply-to; s=fm3; bh=9b68iKsk8DPJHoYxXOYWybMr7+T fDaS+j0bppFnZpLo=; b=aYxbuGTfofOqjr3l46ffYuGleIRL9XBMhQT9Zgknwgw 26NkeNlothDsGmm8UFEZmbC+pKj3pmmsMdvMsNNcbq2zPbYxcjxAb7tpLZu82mVE O/EHyv/z8hMS3yhLHIufw1U1MYjzY5hPEH2uflSCkBXwCThXDRgsrx9R5dt4PBms 5JJlgeFs4/jd+O1Rn2PSON4UBWvpiOTeVDLWdlmZTDBuY+py9ADefYRG6W41HKVF fG7wd9888EWenY7VaqPCI7XN8C5qUHZxSKs/aPHP8WI+o+L9z33VGny19xj4GfsL vURJYFnKkHrkEYdf+wAtdXaoZMhVtLxar6e0BLVrJ3w== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=9b68iK sk8DPJHoYxXOYWybMr7+TfDaS+j0bppFnZpLo=; b=EpqzaZa8hQY2XMl+bD4Ibs 5J6Vx3hDVHqcdvcNMW8piRtpH0jcqRY3Os4gGw/ygc9Ue3EDY+ZGeaMttHDw9ciJ 09La2Xqx/wwAwsCJcAol9yS9QLLCN9I0IF7b6O9k17OO78KXEtu069hJROzdpt/g 3/V+2952OmNHIF/VqPdc/rRa9+cqwPjje6Beqw7F9oVxOc0Z+vPuDmZijV2Mi1Ac iSMzezWYvVFQe/UBgvC3dAsnyjYW2SdO3TZ1Ti6SyXiUFcSld9G5Ibp8bujTtOij gyd6TB0DeFCOKA4aK/aIj+kuiU0jUua8KrPV/ulBca0yepvFhHsGahk44NTtHA8g == X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrvdejledggeekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepfffhvffukfhfgggtuggjsehttdertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefirhgvghcu mffjuceoghhrvghgsehkrhhorghhrdgtohhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeevueehje fgfffgiedvudekvdektdelleelgefhleejieeugeegveeuuddukedvteenucfkphepkeef rdekiedrjeegrdeigeenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrih hlfhhrohhmpehgrhgvgheskhhrohgrhhdrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Received: from localhost (83-86-74-64.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.74.64]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 24 May 2021 08:00:54 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 24 May 2021 14:00:41 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Sasha Levin , Linux Kernel Mailing List , stable , Tetsuo Handa , syzbot , dri-devel , Linux Fbdev development list Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.12 5/5] tty: vt: always invoke vc->vc_sw->con_resize callback Message-ID: References: <20210518010940.1485417-1-sashal@kernel.org> <20210518010940.1485417-5-sashal@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 07:45:59AM +0200, Greg KH wrote: > On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 06:35:24PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 6:09 PM Sasha Levin wrote: > > > > > > From: Tetsuo Handa > > > > > > [ Upstream commit ffb324e6f874121f7dce5bdae5e05d02baae7269 ] > > > > So I think the commit is fine, and yes, it should be applied to > > stable, but it's one of those "there were three different patches in > > as many days to fix the problem, and this is the right one, but maybe > > stable should hold off for a while to see that there aren't any > > problem reports". > > > > I don't think there will be any problems from this, but while the > > patch is tiny, it's conceptually quite a big change to something that > > people haven't really touched for a long time. > > > > So use your own judgement, but it might be a good idea to wait a week > > before backporting this to see if anything screams. > > I was going to wait a few weeks for this, and the other vt patches that > were marked with cc: stable@ before queueing them up. I have now queued all of these up. greg k-h