Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 24 May 2021 21:47:51 +0000
From:   Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To:     menglong8.dong@gmail.com
Cc:     viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, keescook@chromium.org,
        samitolvanen@google.com, johan@kernel.org, ojeda@kernel.org,
        jeyu@kernel.org, joe@perches.com, dong.menglong@zte.com.cn,
        masahiroy@kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, axboe@kernel.dk, hare@suse.de,
        gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, tj@kernel.org, song@kernel.org,
        neilb@suse.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, brho@google.com,
        f.fainelli@gmail.com, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com, arnd@arndb.de,
        linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk, mhiramat@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
        vbabka@suse.cz, glider@google.com, pmladek@suse.com,
        ebiederm@xmission.com, jojing64@gmail.com,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] init/do_mounts.c: fix rootfs_fs_type with ramfs
Message-ID: <20210524214751.GZ4332@42.do-not-panic.com>
References: <20210522113155.244796-1-dong.menglong@zte.com.cn>
 <20210522113155.244796-4-dong.menglong@zte.com.cn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210522113155.244796-4-dong.menglong@zte.com.cn>
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 07:31:55PM +0800, menglong8.dong@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Menglong Dong <dong.menglong@zte.com.cn>
> 
> As for the existence of 'user root' which is introduced in previous
> patch, 'rootfs_fs_type', which is used as the root of mount tree,
> is not used directly any more. So it make no sense to switch it
> between ramfs and tmpfs, just fix it with ramfs to simplify the
> code.
> diff --git a/init/do_mounts.c b/init/do_mounts.c
> index 943cb58846fb..6d1253f75bb0 100644
> --- a/init/do_mounts.c
> +++ b/init/do_mounts.c
> @@ -689,24 +689,8 @@ void __init init_user_rootfs(void)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> -static bool is_tmpfs;
> -static int rootfs_init_fs_context(struct fs_context *fc)
> -{
> -	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_TMPFS) && is_tmpfs)
> -		return shmem_init_fs_context(fc);
> -
> -	return ramfs_init_fs_context(fc);
> -}
> -
>  struct file_system_type rootfs_fs_type = {

Then why not also just rename rootfs_fs_type to ram_rootfs_fs_type to
make this even clearer now?

>  	.name		= "rootfs",
> -	.init_fs_context = rootfs_init_fs_context,
> +	.init_fs_context = ramfs_init_fs_context,
>  	.kill_sb	= kill_litter_super,
>  };

  Luis