Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <4964298a8d264dafaa807c43bab5d174@dh-electronics.com>
In-Reply-To: <4964298a8d264dafaa807c43bab5d174@dh-electronics.com>
From:   Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 24 May 2021 21:10:38 -0300
Message-ID: <CAOMZO5CaK5mJpDp7-ak3Q08ErWrfBQ-xCgOPpqD+rH_yT1Ok8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: arm: fsl: Add DHCOM PicoITX and DHCOM DRC02
 boards [Klartext]
To:     Christoph Niedermaier <cniedermaier@dh-electronics.com>
Cc:     "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
        kernel <kernel@dh-electronics.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

Hi Christoph,

On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 7:39 PM Christoph Niedermaier
<cniedermaier@dh-electronics.com> wrote:

> My thought was to be future proof. If there is no match with the Solo now,
> it will fall back to the i.MX6 DualLite. That is why I added both fsl,imx6s
> and fsl,imx6dl in this order.
>
> Should I remove the line with fsl,imx6s?

Yes, please.

Thanks