Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 25 May 2021 09:08:20 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To:     Julian Braha <julianbraha@gmail.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
        Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
        Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>,
        Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>,
        linux-xtensa@linux-xtensa.org,
        Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
        Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
        Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>,
        linux-um@lists.infradead.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] LOCKDEP: reduce LOCKDEP dependency list
Message-ID: <YKyiZBAGcbGMEjTc@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
References: <20210524224150.8009-1-rdunlap@infradead.org>
 <3398848.TK9RqziN78@ubuntu-mate-laptop>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3398848.TK9RqziN78@ubuntu-mate-laptop>
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 11:31:22PM -0400, Julian Braha wrote:
> Hi Randy,
> 
> It seems I introduced a new unmet dependency bug
> in my attempt to fix one :/
> 
> Anyway, I don't see why the dependency on FRAME_POINTER
> was necessary in the first place, so LGTM.

It might have been an attempt at ensuring sane backtraces; but I didn't
dig into the history of the thing. Either way around, it's fairly
out-dated if that was indeed the case.