Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp4385575pxj; Tue, 25 May 2021 06:55:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxGUz9R4TNx7YqKGgB1y8zaOz9/HejgighQpmnNERsvNSWhG72xIFO7UP0MDSUDVlbOpog6 X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c805:: with SMTP id a5mr14409264edt.128.1621950922256; Tue, 25 May 2021 06:55:22 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1621950922; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=NbB9L/s/n9mgUsyY5wC0E1jtccoW5tvB5oo+SWEtqhLK33Ch9/H+OFiJQ99DiibsG7 2maTek0hCT0H0k9rlOweo44DttRgICfwXMnrGHGsi73RBcQQVoXsr2fAGTSsSGaA28Fy w+ORsI8SAIcFqNCNpE+dhZND+1/acybE4rmQTcgT6Y3Lk9sTsD0XrMuUL0BAparx91ra 7tB3xIXKgAbOws8SAUmdT5QpKYYVJY1X0Kj/pljWDgp1Zq/e9jNc1TefYMAh+We2ZzaE JgV9jHXmtK/mfotCZFn80r5QXcUSJ2ADisBycFLHQIxBKHFdBJoj0x9XeqPovqtbiX/Q bOIw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:from:references :to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=PW7OrrfjfM61YRapb5tPZf3kCsKbCNzZN/BPGRKNoNU=; b=UL3VHkcLtXPfSCX6pWCoSnT4KmVgTTD5PgPdZVijp26PhABmsZcbSpBp/Rtne03nu9 /Gb46zg4F2kEYLtSZ0jXdUsx+8uZo2mHeKRfO1mbyVcd3f+H9ohYUeqebnyGNqj2l2GF dNSQxyv/gV/XjgtEp6VlHNUhfqNr8nzdRvVoemY+xyrWi4/QBxvH3Bpu6fxT35X0XFJ3 fpHA/g4DIQ+6Ib/3U54k//5f4gTW0zpy1DM4CBdfgMVY16vMsCxV7yqHVReR0lJNuyev 8TwwI601zlfJuq+6fD+3eveoD5X2SM9XO+lXSOpGSMG/OGciKGV/hK4oxatHg/W1lzxd hHKg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=hhsZqvbL; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id h20si16509743ejl.393.2021.05.25.06.54.59; Tue, 25 May 2021 06:55:22 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=hhsZqvbL; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233391AbhEYNzj (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 25 May 2021 09:55:39 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:56161 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233517AbhEYNy1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 May 2021 09:54:27 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1621950776; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=PW7OrrfjfM61YRapb5tPZf3kCsKbCNzZN/BPGRKNoNU=; b=hhsZqvbLUmNdI9nUTEu6pqq0wvEEUdmGPqttIsrdRkyoW0hJ/GH/KRq7J9sISzJgdJ293D bqazXXt/2eBPXTdrtPxNaUwtEroJF+iDaqH4Egw5aixQIyJ5OYCCK1nnJzXzMA4TkUOGie rIhf5+6ycbO7gffOuxxflGUF/Phfcns= Received: from mail-wm1-f69.google.com (mail-wm1-f69.google.com [209.85.128.69]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-455-X-EA_lcONvuZj6b1GGgkqA-1; Tue, 25 May 2021 09:52:53 -0400 X-MC-Unique: X-EA_lcONvuZj6b1GGgkqA-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f69.google.com with SMTP id l185-20020a1c25c20000b029014b0624775eso5931693wml.6 for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 06:52:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=PW7OrrfjfM61YRapb5tPZf3kCsKbCNzZN/BPGRKNoNU=; b=ib7nnx5vI/KGyrPch2xRKyeHSaDqE4/HBFIoy0ERtdbkNSaVEZro0kzg/66NnIfX6e IgMuvBo5mIPeeoKqVTrK7E7vVOo5GeRVnS+uqTtDItgZn5Ow/yduAHdZuGSd93XSzVSm I9gqd8K5afRESkg5jJV4jq1oSvpMx25G+KV6XwyecIC5cLlpJ5h5akbfSNlQQwE9EjVU bYjTUp5pKKWWdxLu3xB7qfanQ3fqTmcxa3QLBvzUGCwkd1YpoXy//krCiF+hz23dxRQ9 RLDsyghemTmkdCbp1K8vU6qVV48BEyf/BdjcbtLU6IBnrmDhyQfC756j9h/n4BqZ/oKc QUkQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5310sx9dT/iIiqwtLUiaLUUWgvN8e5QEv1ovNzT75h/oEz8h8l7w 6Qkn90NuXvLIP0VcPTdD4RjhSv6Qr8msSWB29ZXkjKak+qBi23cIm1Pbg7B2UYYeyl4COXf+8Cq IPjvRNRbVVfgnU3CLnZv89DBL X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cc83:: with SMTP id p3mr24768903wma.169.1621950772424; Tue, 25 May 2021 06:52:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cc83:: with SMTP id p3mr24768893wma.169.1621950772267; Tue, 25 May 2021 06:52:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.101] ([92.176.231.106]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z18sm16767823wro.33.2021.05.25.06.52.51 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 25 May 2021 06:52:51 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/fb-helper: improve DRM fbdev emulation device names To: Thomas Zimmermann , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Robinson , David Airlie , Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org References: <20210521131910.3000689-1-javierm@redhat.com> <3a6f9235-5375-b2cb-2d63-a47c5f9752bb@suse.de> <4e81ab57-a240-952a-7423-22dc830bc62f@suse.de> From: Javier Martinez Canillas Message-ID: <79f227c4-5ed6-23e8-2d74-3197871359f8@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 15:52:51 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4e81ab57-a240-952a-7423-22dc830bc62f@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, On 5/25/21 3:34 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: [snip] >> >> If you guys with your distro hats on all think it doesn't matter, then >> yeah I'm all for dropping the somewhat silly -drm or drmfb suffixes. I >> think that was just way back so it's easier to know you've loaded the >> right driver, back when there was both drm and native fbdev drivers >> around. But now I think for new hw there's only drm, so should be all >> fine. > > Suse doesn't use fbdev, except for some outliers; most notably hypervfb > and generic efifb/vesafb. Both are now being replaced with drm code. > From what I've seen, it's the same for other distros. And X11 checks > for the existence of device files anyway IIRC. Yes, I believe is the same for us. I'll post a patch to just remove the suffix then. Thanks you both for the feedback. > > Best regards > Thomas > >> -Daniel >> > Best regards, -- Javier Martinez Canillas Software Engineer New Platform Technologies Enablement team RHEL Engineering