Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
To:     Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Cc:     Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>,
        Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@baylibre.com>,
        linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] irqchip: irq-meson-gpio: make it possible to build
 as a module
In-Reply-To: <87r1hwwier.wl-maz@kernel.org>
References: <20201020072532.949137-1-narmstrong@baylibre.com>
 <20201020072532.949137-2-narmstrong@baylibre.com>
 <7hsga8kb8z.fsf@baylibre.com>
 <CAF2Aj3g6c8FEZb3e1by6sd8LpKLaeN5hsKrrQkZUvh8hosiW9A@mail.gmail.com>
 <87r1hwwier.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 25 May 2021 09:17:20 -0700
Message-ID: <7hsg2au6sv.fsf@baylibre.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Precedence: bulk

Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> writes:

> On Fri, 21 May 2021 10:47:48 +0100,
> Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> wrote:
>> 
>> [1  <text/plain; UTF-8 (quoted-printable)>]
>> On Tue, 20 Oct 2020 at 19:23, Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> wrote:
>> 
>> > Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com> writes:
>> >
>> > > In order to reduce the kernel Image size on multi-platform distributions,
>> > > make it possible to build the Amlogic GPIO IRQ controller as a module
>> > > by switching it to a platform driver.
>> > >
>> > > Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
>> >
>> > Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
>> > Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com>
>> >
>> > Tested as a module on meson-sm1-khadas-vim3l where the wired networking
>> > uses GPIO IRQs.
>> >
>> 
>> Good morning Neil, Kevin,
>> 
>> What happened to this set in the end?  I still don't see it in Mainline.
>
> Last time I tried this patch, it broke my test setup in non-obvious
> ways. Has someone checked that the issue I reported back then has been
> resolved now that fw_devlink is more usable?

Not yet, that's (still) on my TODO list... (well, TBH, I forgot about
it, but I'll have another look.)

Kevin