Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp4584700pxj; Tue, 25 May 2021 11:15:35 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxavKTEM7CdFJONBVLNy0w1CXv4UdQtacVs8pm+SCZB/utHMKjuhVc0j6zXSNtXVtTVCrDS X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:7671:: with SMTP id kk17mr30471801ejc.185.1621966535240; Tue, 25 May 2021 11:15:35 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1621966535; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=CNlWzc0vZYYuVLOC2597A7niTfhdDjr0E1RWLd2F5X9TghmP0GZEk78TMQgp4W77IU D3Ylhng6BtKIWyptlXAjrD+odYetS9C3vif3Yv4Da0SRums8olf2veiAjCW6I9KiOANF jF524FpJmJ/h67yaUkFD5kcI66G3qiWU+Am2GpJE+j+Cc/7Du9xRhdRrGJtS+B+ROPo/ ZUfUBUZkz/akmNPHUuTpmrDZB6PS02Io178/Ed7hPqWFLnJMLyZiaP3SsHI+F9sF1AO5 KsSneBYF33aPSwFGXnKDArLMsQp9/JOL2pPX+q7nM975dGuWs1LnP8DRJJV9P+UuqOsV QL9g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=tHz3yBnDAsIM7Q3G7g3xkLT88Rl8VZBpNhW/dY1vxqE=; b=1DDs6ZkPOfQSJi8QPyWmXbHLqd4HjhJjsW8EaCcxJ+Eujgxwk0DzH6oas4OWtLexFz z646vj60ZR6BFhfjNkAZG7VI1LmgUjG897Nibm5rX9G1NnbhsQPxjUT6ELQDGOQh3rka 5nIIw/yM8ufdl2WPIVkirll73dZS9h/kWDiY9W/iz9635IpI6LH+bWE9iC29GWaiPnN7 w8Dmb3Sh7dDButbASc8QWGYDazgMwT4Js5SQ5Ba5g87FInuMEVvkFYDbsQT+wxYqJ4TA RBPSTaiwRAhhEXmQTfeHd8TNHnwkTvVDTQdURnnaPVDQPobPzZnVvGvKVK4OhAkOikIf n91g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j1si16994066eds.552.2021.05.25.11.15.11; Tue, 25 May 2021 11:15:35 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233979AbhEYRey (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 25 May 2021 13:34:54 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:33028 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232220AbhEYRer (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 May 2021 13:34:47 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2E9B1516; Tue, 25 May 2021 10:33:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e113632-lin.cambridge.arm.com (e113632-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.194.46]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B1F8A3F73B; Tue, 25 May 2021 10:33:15 -0700 (PDT) From: Valentin Schneider To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Marc Zyngier , Thomas Gleixner , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Vincenzo Frascino Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 01/10] genirq: Add chip flag to denote automatic IRQ (un)masking Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 18:32:46 +0100 Message-Id: <20210525173255.620606-2-valentin.schneider@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20210525173255.620606-1-valentin.schneider@arm.com> References: <20210525173255.620606-1-valentin.schneider@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Some IRQ chips such as the Arm GICs automagically mask / unmask an IRQ during the handling of said IRQ. This renders further mask / unmask operations within the flow handlers redundant, which we do want to leverage as masking by itself is not cheap (Distributor access via MMIO for GICs). This is different from having a chip->irq_mask_ack() callback as this masking is: - inherent to the chip->irq_ack() and *cannot* be omitted - a *different* masking state than chip->irq_mask() (chip->irq_mask() is idempotent, chip->irq_ack() really isn't) Add a chip flag, IRQCHIP_AUTOMASKS_FLOW, to denote chips with such behaviour. Add a new IRQ data flag, IRQD_IRQ_FLOW_MASKED, to keep this flow-induced mask state separate from regular mask / unmask operations (IRQD_IRQ_MASKED). Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider --- include/linux/irq.h | 10 ++++++++++ kernel/irq/chip.c | 5 +++++ kernel/irq/debugfs.c | 2 ++ kernel/irq/internals.h | 5 +++++ 4 files changed, 22 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/linux/irq.h b/include/linux/irq.h index 8e9a9ae471a6..ef179245a642 100644 --- a/include/linux/irq.h +++ b/include/linux/irq.h @@ -221,6 +221,8 @@ struct irq_data { * irq_chip::irq_set_affinity() when deactivated. * IRQD_IRQ_ENABLED_ON_SUSPEND - Interrupt is enabled on suspend by irq pm if * irqchip have flag IRQCHIP_ENABLE_WAKEUP_ON_SUSPEND set. + * IRQD_IRQ_FLOW_MASKED - Interrupt is masked by ACK. Only EOI can + * clear this. */ enum { IRQD_TRIGGER_MASK = 0xf, @@ -247,6 +249,7 @@ enum { IRQD_HANDLE_ENFORCE_IRQCTX = (1 << 28), IRQD_AFFINITY_ON_ACTIVATE = (1 << 29), IRQD_IRQ_ENABLED_ON_SUSPEND = (1 << 30), + IRQD_IRQ_FLOW_MASKED = (1 << 31), }; #define __irqd_to_state(d) ACCESS_PRIVATE((d)->common, state_use_accessors) @@ -351,6 +354,11 @@ static inline bool irqd_irq_masked(struct irq_data *d) return __irqd_to_state(d) & IRQD_IRQ_MASKED; } +static inline bool irqd_irq_flow_masked(struct irq_data *d) +{ + return __irqd_to_state(d) & IRQD_IRQ_FLOW_MASKED; +} + static inline bool irqd_irq_inprogress(struct irq_data *d) { return __irqd_to_state(d) & IRQD_IRQ_INPROGRESS; @@ -569,6 +577,7 @@ struct irq_chip { * IRQCHIP_SUPPORTS_NMI: Chip can deliver NMIs, only for root irqchips * IRQCHIP_ENABLE_WAKEUP_ON_SUSPEND: Invokes __enable_irq()/__disable_irq() for wake irqs * in the suspend path if they are in disabled state + * IRQCHIP_AUTOMASKS_FLOW: chip->ack() masks and chip->eoi() unmasks */ enum { IRQCHIP_SET_TYPE_MASKED = (1 << 0), @@ -581,6 +590,7 @@ enum { IRQCHIP_SUPPORTS_LEVEL_MSI = (1 << 7), IRQCHIP_SUPPORTS_NMI = (1 << 8), IRQCHIP_ENABLE_WAKEUP_ON_SUSPEND = (1 << 9), + IRQCHIP_AUTOMASKS_FLOW = (1 << 10), }; #include diff --git a/kernel/irq/chip.c b/kernel/irq/chip.c index 7f04c7d8296e..21a21baa1366 100644 --- a/kernel/irq/chip.c +++ b/kernel/irq/chip.c @@ -173,6 +173,11 @@ static void irq_state_clr_masked(struct irq_desc *desc) irqd_clear(&desc->irq_data, IRQD_IRQ_MASKED); } +static void irq_state_clr_flow_masked(struct irq_desc *desc) +{ + irqd_clear(&desc->irq_data, IRQD_IRQ_FLOW_MASKED); +} + static void irq_state_clr_started(struct irq_desc *desc) { irqd_clear(&desc->irq_data, IRQD_IRQ_STARTED); diff --git a/kernel/irq/debugfs.c b/kernel/irq/debugfs.c index e4cff358b437..3ae83622d701 100644 --- a/kernel/irq/debugfs.c +++ b/kernel/irq/debugfs.c @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ static const struct irq_bit_descr irqchip_flags[] = { BIT_MASK_DESCR(IRQCHIP_SUPPORTS_LEVEL_MSI), BIT_MASK_DESCR(IRQCHIP_SUPPORTS_NMI), BIT_MASK_DESCR(IRQCHIP_ENABLE_WAKEUP_ON_SUSPEND), + BIT_MASK_DESCR(IRQCHIP_AUTOMASKS_FLOW), }; static void @@ -103,6 +104,7 @@ static const struct irq_bit_descr irqdata_states[] = { BIT_MASK_DESCR(IRQD_IRQ_STARTED), BIT_MASK_DESCR(IRQD_IRQ_DISABLED), BIT_MASK_DESCR(IRQD_IRQ_MASKED), + BIT_MASK_DESCR(IRQD_IRQ_FLOW_MASKED), BIT_MASK_DESCR(IRQD_IRQ_INPROGRESS), BIT_MASK_DESCR(IRQD_PER_CPU), diff --git a/kernel/irq/internals.h b/kernel/irq/internals.h index 54363527feea..b6c1cceddec0 100644 --- a/kernel/irq/internals.h +++ b/kernel/irq/internals.h @@ -245,6 +245,11 @@ static inline void irq_state_set_masked(struct irq_desc *desc) irqd_set(&desc->irq_data, IRQD_IRQ_MASKED); } +static inline void irq_state_set_flow_masked(struct irq_desc *desc) +{ + irqd_set(&desc->irq_data, IRQD_IRQ_FLOW_MASKED); +} + #undef __irqd_to_state static inline void __kstat_incr_irqs_this_cpu(struct irq_desc *desc) -- 2.25.1