Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp4699968pxj; Tue, 25 May 2021 14:18:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxhi1ATY5XbIsV1I+HASiITkV58DM8PvgAXqjJYW5m120VwHYUBCVFm2iJ0DrsjxIqzqcdQ X-Received: by 2002:a92:2a0a:: with SMTP id r10mr23539512ile.274.1621977520485; Tue, 25 May 2021 14:18:40 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1621977520; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=V3tLW+wscFAG/77ZDTNYXaGsMcYPtU9ciiW+M96oQohBLfnhDmS5vnt/sLgEAIDc/t gVfVOIu7nqHBMDP0WOzLgkHXoHfhAcGHkDJb9bFYpFYR9o6ICXFei5cn//jzj9EYhT+V s17qEVmRkwhcJViqzhvQOUi9g2BDv+WamTbFFq80hOpUS0dMlB60+cXX9wpK+EVGT7Iy Tcur77LEH8UesrmkDltP+UkUsvmTN09o7cSlrhiTJW/0FKA7CMW+ASR0JNrWZy80APv9 YpWwEgHWkpF2Q6wdVYAMC9gICZDb0QhtAqsyW1rXXdA48V4fs0NwH8YjzgSdQ5b4oRVg xq/g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=IRxL8GJC8XQG7+FCFoyvSNwc5ENdDnrd7mjSbmRyZTg=; b=Mt2GBz2rJ+mx9FyjigKnYArRD4yNjFLZFDSsoCquM3aeKTy6IQWfClo7BL2326nitB 9vtlaPaQPSRFPdgFvwHgAqhdMCjT1FNyJMZeC8mhlxDuJ32LcQr16X+joroCueOAgzvs yGd3yYcF/VW0xpHPQ6XaRCiJc4pYxJFmuy8J4Ng1JM1JJFVPpBoILUDBAxZkvizAQlik a4Bj+pPLScwwjO92hmhRNVwHlMGfa/CwkC6TVqUDpj3litoxSNrbXQWPiZW617mU5CRl 3jDn/8F6C46mm9M5fWeXKwKH15iWMLaojwFwwJNdP0WVUsJu8pBImRGwVt4+WzyXBCrp CHRg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id c14si12962423ilm.1.2021.05.25.14.18.24; Tue, 25 May 2021 14:18:40 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234189AbhEYRfN (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 25 May 2021 13:35:13 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:33086 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234006AbhEYRe4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 May 2021 13:34:56 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56BFB168F; Tue, 25 May 2021 10:33:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e113632-lin.cambridge.arm.com (e113632-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.194.46]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 467B43F792; Tue, 25 May 2021 10:33:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Valentin Schneider To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Marc Zyngier , Thomas Gleixner , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Vincenzo Frascino Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 08/10] irqchip/gic-v3-its: Use irq_chip_ack_parent() Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 18:32:53 +0100 Message-Id: <20210525173255.620606-9-valentin.schneider@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20210525173255.620606-1-valentin.schneider@arm.com> References: <20210525173255.620606-1-valentin.schneider@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subsequent patches will make the GIC irqchips use a flow handler that issues an ->irq_ack(). irqchips of child domains need to handle this. Note: I'm very much not fond of this; this is treacherous and explodes if any parent chip doesn't have an ->ack() callback. It turns out okay with EOImode=0 because handle_fasteoi_irq() doesn't issue any ->ack(), but that is very fragile at best. An alternative would be to o make irq_chip_ack_parent() check the callback against NULL o make irq_chip_ack_parent() the default chip->irq_ack() via MSI_FLAG_USE_DEF_CHIP_OPS. XXX: what about pMSI and fMSI ? Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider --- drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its-pci-msi.c | 1 + drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c | 1 + 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its-pci-msi.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its-pci-msi.c index ad2810c017ed..5bc2787ee86a 100644 --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its-pci-msi.c +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its-pci-msi.c @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ static struct irq_chip its_msi_irq_chip = { .name = "ITS-MSI", .irq_unmask = its_unmask_msi_irq, .irq_mask = its_mask_msi_irq, + .irq_ack = irq_chip_ack_parent, .irq_eoi = irq_chip_eoi_parent, .irq_write_msi_msg = pci_msi_domain_write_msg, }; diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c index 2e6923c2c8a8..ce39d52409e9 100644 --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c @@ -1976,6 +1976,7 @@ static struct irq_chip its_irq_chip = { .name = "ITS", .irq_mask = its_mask_irq, .irq_unmask = its_unmask_irq, + .irq_ack = irq_chip_ack_parent, .irq_eoi = irq_chip_eoi_parent, .irq_set_affinity = its_set_affinity, .irq_compose_msi_msg = its_irq_compose_msi_msg, -- 2.25.1