Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20210525144250.214670-1-tpiepho@gmail.com> <20210525144250.214670-2-tpiepho@gmail.com>
 <CAGS_qxqSo=s5=geB56QGKtgsHwjYfULYJfuaCTcghY3+c9yVBA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGS_qxqSo=s5=geB56QGKtgsHwjYfULYJfuaCTcghY3+c9yVBA@mail.gmail.com>
From:   Trent Piepho <tpiepho@gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 25 May 2021 14:09:23 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+7tXijdGYdEBT6PB7hWk0Ups3Y97iWPx=AWWsb0z=OPqVzA1g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] lib/math/rational: Add Kunit test cases
To:     Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        andy@kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Oskar Schirmer <oskar@scara.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 10:34 AM Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 25, 2021 at 7:43 AM Trent Piepho <tpiepho@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Adds a number of test cases that cover a range of possible code paths.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Trent Piepho <tpiepho@gmail.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
>
> Looks really good to me, just two nits.
>
> Tangent:
> I didn't check to see that this covers all the interesting cases, but
> it seems like it does.
> If you want, you can try generating a code coverage report to double check.
> Instructions for doing so can be found in
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/20210414222256.1280532-1-dlatypov@google.com/
> I would have done that and included the #s in this email, but my
> workplace decided to subtly break my workstation in some way and I
> haven't gotten around to root causing...

I installed a gcc 6.4 toolchain and changed the uml_abort() call to
exit(), coverage was generated, but still truncated and incorrectly
near 0%.  So what I did was crash after running all the test cases I
cared about by dividing by zero and then coverage data was produced
correctly.  It's 100% by lines.  But I think both possibilities when
the largest semiconvergent is exactly half the previous convergent
aren't tested.

> >  lib/math/rational-test.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> Ah, sorry, I forgot to mention this in the previous email.
> If you look at kunit/style.rst docs, you'll see the documentation now
> states a preference for the name of this file to be one of
> {rational_test.c, rational_kunit.c}

Before I chose a name, I checked every file with kunit tests cases,
and *-test was the most common naming pattern, including the sample
case.  I would be nice if changing the docs to say something is a
standard also updated the code to make that reality.