Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1423659AbWJaVgj (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:36:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1423658AbWJaVgj (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:36:39 -0500 Received: from dsl027-180-168.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.27.180.168]:61584 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1423650AbWJaVgi (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:36:38 -0500 Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 13:36:39 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20061031.133639.112620851.davem@davemloft.net> To: shemminger@osdl.org Cc: peter.hicks@poggs.co.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Thousands of interfaces From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20061031102222.7ab1ed6b@freekitty> References: <20061031092550.GA8201@tufnell.london.poggs.net> <20061031.013154.122620846.davem@davemloft.net> <20061031102222.7ab1ed6b@freekitty> X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1416 Lines: 32 From: Stephen Hemminger Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 10:22:22 -0800 > On Tue, 31 Oct 2006 01:31:54 -0800 (PST) > David Miller wrote: > > > From: Peter Hicks > > Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 09:25:50 +0000 > > > > [ Discussion belongs on netdev@vger.kernel.org, added to CC: ] > > > > > I have a dual 3GHz Xeon machine with a 2.4.21 kernel and thousands (15k+) of > > > ipip tunnel interfaces. These are being used to tunnel traffic from remote > > > routers, over a private network, and handed off to a third party. > > ... > > > Is it possible to speed up creation of the interfaces? Currently it takes > > > around 24 hours. Is there are more efficient way to handle a very large > > > number of IP-IP tunnels? Would upgrading to a 2.6 kernel be of use? > > > > > 2.4 has a several N^2 searches for interfaces (and is in deep freeze by now). > 2.6 had several changes to handle 1000's of interfaces. Oops I didn't notice this was with 2.4.x. Indeed, 2.4.x definitely cannot handle large numbers of networking interfaces at all without major surgery. 2.6.x should handle this significantly better. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/