Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1423870AbWKAAxS (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Oct 2006 19:53:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1423871AbWKAAxR (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Oct 2006 19:53:17 -0500 Received: from dsl027-180-168.sfo1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([216.27.180.168]:55429 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1423870AbWKAAxR (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Oct 2006 19:53:17 -0500 Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:53:14 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20061031.165314.39158827.davem@davemloft.net> To: clameter@sgi.com Cc: hch@lst.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] add dev_to_node() From: David Miller In-Reply-To: References: <20061030141501.GC7164@lst.de> <20061030.143357.130208425.davem@davemloft.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 4.2 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 780 Lines: 20 From: Christoph Lameter Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 16:10:48 -0800 (PST) > On Mon, 30 Oct 2006, David Miller wrote: > > > So, please add some sanity to this situation and just put the node > > into the generic struct device. :-) > > Good. Then we can remove the node from the pci structure and get rid of > pcibus_to_node? Yes, that's possible, because the idea is that the arch specific bus layer code would initialize the node value. Therefore, there would be no need for things like pcibus_to_node() any longer. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/