Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1946506AbWKACdO (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Oct 2006 21:33:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1946508AbWKACdO (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Oct 2006 21:33:14 -0500 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.186]:60252 "EHLO nf-out-0910.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1946506AbWKACdN (ORCPT ); Tue, 31 Oct 2006 21:33:13 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=OJthkGOBQT595hhL2yNumdD4S9AKidVRxz8UqLunNUlJeQqPCgaxTiuz1hGRLzPBb+WlovGCAbjktDKyZRUIFgmdfRRpAb47WalOJrRaTrZoC3tHww1GfJa0w0eQzKoY0IqL8AtX5xaPlyNZFWCJ2Pyq9ehi3zNsapQRLyL2R9Q= Message-ID: Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 21:33:11 -0500 From: "Holden Karau" To: "OGAWA Hirofumi" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] fat: improve sync performance by grouping writes revised Cc: "Holden Karau" , "Josef Sipek" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "akpm@osdl.org" , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, "Nick Piggin" , "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn_Engel?=" In-Reply-To: <87odrst22f.fsf@duaron.myhome.or.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <454765AC.1050905@xandros.com> <87mz7cqvd8.fsf@duaron.myhome.or.jp> <87slh4tesh.fsf@duaron.myhome.or.jp> <87odrst22f.fsf@duaron.myhome.or.jp> X-Google-Sender-Auth: 4bfcdb600c27df43 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 997 Lines: 26 Whoops, sorry about that. Yes it would improve performance on fat12 & fat16 [although I haven't tested it with fat12]. What I meant by that sentance is that, fat sync performance is pretty bad with or without my patch, its just slightly less worse with my patch :-) On 10/31/06, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote: > "Holden Karau" writes: > > > This patch is just meant to make fat32 sync performance better, not > > necessarily make it usable for everyone [one step at a time and all > > that]. > > Sorry, I can't see your point. The FAT12 and FAT16 also have backup FAT. > And the your patch didn't make performance better, right? > -- > OGAWA Hirofumi > -- Cell: 613-276-1645 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/