Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp5276417pxj; Wed, 26 May 2021 07:02:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyBbnSLZwNRrE5+PWH5Pk7yYczQgsYn6WIDyqreXqInLs9KsGel1fVBKcgblOP0qfaVlhvm X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:1b87:: with SMTP id h7mr27020062ili.185.1622037739882; Wed, 26 May 2021 07:02:19 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1622037739; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=D+LN8HNpwTIT4MgFsj297v9y3A9dyEyv4WNU1CCu3XblcY+2N6XzDPngsFbUfkUnxi XGhwp1GFIl4W7RBNg9T4Bzker3568ikwxxGVkfXNoDKtqWAJxjtMqlbrC0lnl4UvguP3 B1zuBT09WYgwyboHXW1zv9G/o4s4djJh2Mg/EHMR92u8w9S1G3cxUKLaR2JC8Txqn678 GxFUGHulmOsJzLy633Dyzf1XHaj+pS5GsyLvvGv6Y6csMm3WE2t3SaemweRlkVAZC0aP ZJwsfpTTATTVD46DkzRsycQ65MlVFhj8J0uWTJAOZWpMdkFmb+McQHTbmstzQoMKy7XV lGVg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=D0XBw0qkYoqpj2AiUYC2dNU8aBTx7Hdl+FF5izmQ42o=; b=JVQJDbZjcckNK/gCIS3NdPgqDBb2R4hIjxdSQJAFnkZA5Yy3U4hIkDR+57EXw0hU7H 4ymi830a4wmmI/6flu3mtLAXid2fy44SfaR3hPyPA1IEbKVEVmlu8oXn03m2T2MFXdxI AvTe2THXL5/AJLqmNl7hQ4uh2w5r9YBUbtRpdSO2q1tHzZyv8nM6aTg4Z7gZvtkLSHix iEQ+WQ8PR0S/HIXkvgnvOVWW19YdVt+Pyz1nqdeoy3159UQm+TOXni5rktqHW927eOMa y8RHF4exzifl3nBY+oavQTdu872AaKZXKmF3ErpLr3hBxyQngS+SnjpCLGdAyFW5Jow9 kxfA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=ifNxL3oZ; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a7si22597089jat.120.2021.05.26.07.02.05; Wed, 26 May 2021 07:02:19 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=ifNxL3oZ; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233327AbhEZOA1 (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 26 May 2021 10:00:27 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:35068 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233313AbhEZOA0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 May 2021 10:00:26 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 80A4C611C9; Wed, 26 May 2021 13:58:55 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1622037535; bh=y/SyTKZfPpfJqyFfY2N1A5uqWRWmWxxvUARt46QN00s=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ifNxL3oZhwLBpNMe3r5PA6s67RxEoM2vSIFGxpxnuiwdBgMqUyq7kqTW8BNFMK7V4 aHImC1/gIQ+3herJ5P7SsfzGtSMm9tFBq3i9K2xBDsyI/DMaTtA+b57x1EviNtfN9q iOl8mo9iSFxuxCaskIOJSFCr6gWAjdDqqb8xhswQkUsR2i4XMQsb8qLa3nR5c6EsDf 2g3N4p0iH+SEFgABy/RjtaHin3ZnqwCKwKIFzH2O/HJh6EP4npxnxXYu4GTpmGhy28 7Op3WtQgKPgsuCi9J0n9TCWPS8h9Au+IaATM7/ByKTts++pIemlQzzl/piiKstG5HV YWAy1mLukJ/Yw== Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 06:58:54 -0700 From: Jaegeuk Kim To: Chao Yu Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/2] f2fs: support RO feature Message-ID: References: <20210521190217.2484099-1-jaegeuk@kernel.org> <20210521190217.2484099-2-jaegeuk@kernel.org> <984caf0c-ddec-930a-cbc6-084c8a9b67e5@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <984caf0c-ddec-930a-cbc6-084c8a9b67e5@huawei.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 05/26, Chao Yu wrote: > On 2021/5/22 3:02, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > Given RO feature in superblock, we don't need to check provisioning/reserve > > spaces and SSA area. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim > > --- > > fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 2 ++ > > fs/f2fs/segment.c | 3 +++ > > fs/f2fs/super.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > > 3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h > > index c0bead0df66a..2c6913261586 100644 > > --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h > > @@ -168,6 +168,7 @@ struct f2fs_mount_info { > > #define F2FS_FEATURE_SB_CHKSUM 0x0800 > > #define F2FS_FEATURE_CASEFOLD 0x1000 > > #define F2FS_FEATURE_COMPRESSION 0x2000 > > +#define F2FS_FEATURE_RO 0x4000 > > #define __F2FS_HAS_FEATURE(raw_super, mask) \ > > ((raw_super->feature & cpu_to_le32(mask)) != 0) > > @@ -939,6 +940,7 @@ static inline void set_new_dnode(struct dnode_of_data *dn, struct inode *inode, > > #define NR_CURSEG_DATA_TYPE (3) > > #define NR_CURSEG_NODE_TYPE (3) > > #define NR_CURSEG_INMEM_TYPE (2) > > +#define NR_CURSEG_RO_TYPE (2) > > #define NR_CURSEG_PERSIST_TYPE (NR_CURSEG_DATA_TYPE + NR_CURSEG_NODE_TYPE) > > #define NR_CURSEG_TYPE (NR_CURSEG_INMEM_TYPE + NR_CURSEG_PERSIST_TYPE) > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c > > index 8668df7870d0..67cec8f858a2 100644 > > --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c > > @@ -4674,6 +4674,9 @@ static int sanity_check_curseg(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi) > > { > > int i; > > + if (__F2FS_HAS_FEATURE(sbi->raw_super, F2FS_FEATURE_RO)) > > + return 0; > > We need to skip this sanity check because .next_blkoff may point to end position > of image? Since we only use hot data and node. Let me check them only. > > > + > > /* > > * In LFS/SSR curseg, .next_blkoff should point to an unused blkaddr; > > * In LFS curseg, all blkaddr after .next_blkoff should be unused. > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c > > index b29de80ab60e..312bfab54693 100644 > > --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c > > @@ -1819,7 +1819,11 @@ static int f2fs_show_options(struct seq_file *seq, struct dentry *root) > > static void default_options(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi) > > { > > /* init some FS parameters */ > > - F2FS_OPTION(sbi).active_logs = NR_CURSEG_PERSIST_TYPE; > > + if (__F2FS_HAS_FEATURE(sbi->raw_super, F2FS_FEATURE_RO)) > > + F2FS_OPTION(sbi).active_logs = NR_CURSEG_RO_TYPE; > > + else > > + F2FS_OPTION(sbi).active_logs = NR_CURSEG_PERSIST_TYPE; > > + > > F2FS_OPTION(sbi).inline_xattr_size = DEFAULT_INLINE_XATTR_ADDRS; > > F2FS_OPTION(sbi).whint_mode = WHINT_MODE_OFF; > > F2FS_OPTION(sbi).alloc_mode = ALLOC_MODE_DEFAULT; > > @@ -1994,6 +1998,11 @@ static int f2fs_remount(struct super_block *sb, int *flags, char *data) > > err = parse_options(sb, data, true); > > if (err) > > goto restore_opts; > > + > > + if (__F2FS_HAS_FEATURE(sbi->raw_super, F2FS_FEATURE_RO) && > > + !(*flags & SB_RDONLY)) > > err = -EROFS; ? Done. > > > + goto restore_opts; > > + > > checkpoint_changed = > > disable_checkpoint != test_opt(sbi, DISABLE_CHECKPOINT); > > @@ -3137,16 +3146,18 @@ int f2fs_sanity_check_ckpt(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi) > > ovp_segments = le32_to_cpu(ckpt->overprov_segment_count); > > reserved_segments = le32_to_cpu(ckpt->rsvd_segment_count); > > + if (__F2FS_HAS_FEATURE(sbi->raw_super, F2FS_FEATURE_RO)) > > + goto no_reserved; > > if (unlikely(fsmeta < F2FS_MIN_META_SEGMENTS || > > ovp_segments == 0 || reserved_segments == 0)) { > > f2fs_err(sbi, "Wrong layout: check mkfs.f2fs version"); > > return 1; > > } > > Well, why not: > > if (!F2FS_HAS_FEATURE(, RO) && unlikely()) { > } Done. > > > - > > +no_reserved: > > user_block_count = le64_to_cpu(ckpt->user_block_count); > > segment_count_main = le32_to_cpu(raw_super->segment_count_main); > > log_blocks_per_seg = le32_to_cpu(raw_super->log_blocks_per_seg); > > - if (!user_block_count || user_block_count >= > > + if (!user_block_count || user_block_count > > > Does this change related to RO feature? if so, let's split condition for > RO feature here? Done. > > > segment_count_main << log_blocks_per_seg) { > > f2fs_err(sbi, "Wrong user_block_count: %u", > > user_block_count); > > @@ -3175,6 +3186,10 @@ int f2fs_sanity_check_ckpt(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi) > > if (le32_to_cpu(ckpt->cur_node_segno[i]) >= main_segs || > > le16_to_cpu(ckpt->cur_node_blkoff[i]) >= blocks_per_seg) > > return 1; > > + > > + if (__F2FS_HAS_FEATURE(sbi->raw_super, F2FS_FEATURE_RO)) > > + goto check_data; > > + > > for (j = i + 1; j < NR_CURSEG_NODE_TYPE; j++) { > > if (le32_to_cpu(ckpt->cur_node_segno[i]) == > > le32_to_cpu(ckpt->cur_node_segno[j])) { > > @@ -3185,10 +3200,15 @@ int f2fs_sanity_check_ckpt(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi) > > } > > } > > } > > +check_data: > > for (i = 0; i < NR_CURSEG_DATA_TYPE; i++) { > > if (le32_to_cpu(ckpt->cur_data_segno[i]) >= main_segs || > > le16_to_cpu(ckpt->cur_data_blkoff[i]) >= blocks_per_seg) > > return 1; > > + > > + if (__F2FS_HAS_FEATURE(sbi->raw_super, F2FS_FEATURE_RO)) > > + goto skip_cross; > > + > > for (j = i + 1; j < NR_CURSEG_DATA_TYPE; j++) { > > if (le32_to_cpu(ckpt->cur_data_segno[i]) == > > le32_to_cpu(ckpt->cur_data_segno[j])) { > > @@ -3210,7 +3230,7 @@ int f2fs_sanity_check_ckpt(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi) > > } > > } > > } > > - > > +skip_cross: > > sit_bitmap_size = le32_to_cpu(ckpt->sit_ver_bitmap_bytesize); > > nat_bitmap_size = le32_to_cpu(ckpt->nat_ver_bitmap_bytesize); > > @@ -3703,6 +3723,13 @@ static int f2fs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, void *data, int silent) > > if (err) > > goto free_options; > > + if (__F2FS_HAS_FEATURE(sbi->raw_super, F2FS_FEATURE_RO) && > > + !f2fs_readonly(sbi->sb)) { > > + f2fs_info(sbi, "Allow to mount readonly mode only"); > > + err = -EINVAL; > > + goto free_options; > > + } > > How about relocating this to parse_options() like other features did, then > we don't need to handle this in both fill_super() and remount()? Done. But not sure what you mean "we don't need to handle both". Thanks, > > Thanks, > > > + > > sb->s_maxbytes = max_file_blocks(NULL) << > > le32_to_cpu(raw_super->log_blocksize); > > sb->s_max_links = F2FS_LINK_MAX; > >