Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp5295426pxj; Wed, 26 May 2021 07:24:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxPFZx+0C+OovrXmbkECnhy5tVW3GxGDyDM1Ra9NybL7y9GOUTse+9nxeZMEjV27FfE+5wJ X-Received: by 2002:a50:d68a:: with SMTP id r10mr38519830edi.90.1622039080308; Wed, 26 May 2021 07:24:40 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1622039080; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=folYIYiNX+R/117Z+H0j1avIlLwoEfJNo8eXZcjZDfBKeBfzF2Pmf25IrtsEC0wVn/ nGJwtqIixE+/cOiqnVTvkQ9aGE3lJ6zjq3UQER9ghxVrNCfVsZSSyB7zC1ORqlPDZiDM IvQ+IBZvuYDxuxpkzxJIuxAVk1RzLoBuiHTDYXhbADZ/W3Ak/Q0ZK9i2miqSMsrg3kbN LXDmTocBe/e6tsfTV2X7CwySd+RfE4gFw7u+urUYPpjAktMbhfxmDYRjPKuT/4xzqhHa mbXy7eEPtE8LmuTtuYz0/5A5MzlgaPz2WvYR/5AhrJubFCwjCz088Mj/vzCel3AdFJ6I H9UQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=Tw3kDFX/e5vI26qc+xYDQKOURNEBK6wDgxbcgNjQMwo=; b=h6lLWazm/tKTjTlah5ISCLEiNFrLU44EmUPDckDboXxvRcxBiixzBZrxaxF0fVEHOL /iPuijLpSl9msK+zbA7voHzzgujeeNCCjxfSihDCAuhJ/NvtDjCpdr1+Tu+nX4sux7nP Vri8P0xWe9NByFPjDuIeXkNxrsw4GRb71tyYvoUa412EsxnB1P5vNVOfYbREh+L4FoNo CJLgkQNu+grGS+V+uUV54eyh5xJ43o70L7m9Ks6Bjfq628a/UJn7r9wHmtQ7oiNFWonP sc6FFleQr7B0YzmEUF4W3yWj+FrxpowN+WOVDVC4yV+Qx19ujUdD2DiXnQNhqkojVJ1D 4cfw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=IpL0I0DL; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id bo27si2787548edb.287.2021.05.26.07.24.17; Wed, 26 May 2021 07:24:40 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=IpL0I0DL; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233656AbhEZOVi (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 26 May 2021 10:21:38 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]:39688 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234432AbhEZOVh (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 May 2021 10:21:37 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1622038804; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Tw3kDFX/e5vI26qc+xYDQKOURNEBK6wDgxbcgNjQMwo=; b=IpL0I0DLDAw+nq6A8djgn+5eJ1TGiYkfqBitPWKLT45ecM2b7qJ8m4nkZu6kGDHC7nZS+X p2efP45/IGRkwKXL7y9mGZ3sT9NS/N5cGs2sWWgjwQ6WZZbJEl9d+wZmh6b1XVBZVBzBFN eFtx1LVXiEvsB/T6ZFpGvzGTj4DiIao= Received: from mail-il1-f200.google.com (mail-il1-f200.google.com [209.85.166.200]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-276-x7me7J06OY2Kb2aP4no8gw-1; Wed, 26 May 2021 10:20:01 -0400 X-MC-Unique: x7me7J06OY2Kb2aP4no8gw-1 Received: by mail-il1-f200.google.com with SMTP id p6-20020a92d6860000b02901bb4be9e3c1so885628iln.11 for ; Wed, 26 May 2021 07:20:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Tw3kDFX/e5vI26qc+xYDQKOURNEBK6wDgxbcgNjQMwo=; b=KblmHuuTz1s3601CD08KVu4pGALXQMRqBZnHperwwAJE5FwqOeyCj868V5v9EyMSc4 /OIJ4I8WWG0mqCXcB0nMbh4qhswVn/O+OVEaDPMomOQkLgszqPmPzzwnlWYK85CErsYS 1fQ69d+ORA1wrpDK+zbcS+XnBKQtkZdMDOA8ZjgyNUiOyNTDmuTSvH2321BofiqbvIMY YNHlUq3M2aMsMjkZ7BcSm1yeMR8xiuAshBdIkl3GxNu3IxCcfdNSLFq2/RJuB+3ZYby+ haUCYbXlTNatRHHjATroFxN/H8kAhARE7WtprUlI7ZMnKm0xS+V1noz7Ifyq4GjqF5fg EMNw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5324ZNr/6ewHmYVEVYP+xZ5grO39YTATBCE6VzKOmWzufR9ADU6x MFqFZvvkKMVoaJzZiw5GPOaD7xk9ILLazhVfCPodzuDqmyy8+aITLoyWvmbKUTWA9EHGlFdbE25 8q2jZjm2kNbjonsDSmlFHtwJheEnLuT9tgDRxmbo+ X-Received: by 2002:a6b:8b58:: with SMTP id n85mr25868917iod.196.1622038801214; Wed, 26 May 2021 07:20:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a6b:8b58:: with SMTP id n85mr25868903iod.196.1622038801001; Wed, 26 May 2021 07:20:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210526134039.3448305-1-colin.king@canonical.com> In-Reply-To: <20210526134039.3448305-1-colin.king@canonical.com> From: Alexander Ahring Oder Aring Date: Wed, 26 May 2021 10:19:49 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] fs: dlm: Fix memory leak of object mh To: Colin King Cc: Christine Caulfield , David Teigland , cluster-devel@redhat.com, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 9:40 AM Colin King wrote: > > From: Colin Ian King > > There is an error return path that is not kfree'ing mh after > it has been successfully allocates. Fix this by free'ing it. > > Addresses-Coverity: ("Resource leak") > Fixes: a070a91cf140 ("fs: dlm: add more midcomms hooks") > Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King > --- > fs/dlm/rcom.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/fs/dlm/rcom.c b/fs/dlm/rcom.c > index 085f21966c72..19298edc1573 100644 > --- a/fs/dlm/rcom.c > +++ b/fs/dlm/rcom.c > @@ -393,6 +393,7 @@ static void receive_rcom_lookup(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_rcom *rc_in) > if (rc_in->rc_id == 0xFFFFFFFF) { > log_error(ls, "receive_rcom_lookup dump from %d", nodeid); > dlm_dump_rsb_name(ls, rc_in->rc_buf, len); > + kfree(mh); > return; This seems to be a bigger issue, we cannot revert the buffer allocation with a kfree, we cannot revert it at all. We should avoid any error handling between create_rcom() and send_rcom(). In general between get_buffer/commit_buffer. I don't see a problem with moving the error handling before create_rcom(). That should fix the issue. - Alex