Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 26 May 2021 18:42:17 +0100
From:   Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To:     Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Cc:     ebiederm@xmission.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
        catalin.marinas@arm.com, davem@davemloft.net, mark.rutland@arm.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] arm64: Add compile-time asserts for siginfo_t offsets
Message-ID: <20210526174217.GB19898@willie-the-truck>
References: <20210429190734.624918-1-elver@google.com>
 <20210429190734.624918-3-elver@google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210429190734.624918-3-elver@google.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Precedence: bulk

Hi Marco,

On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 09:07:34PM +0200, Marco Elver wrote:
> To help catch ABI breaks at compile-time, add compile-time assertions to
> verify the siginfo_t layout.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kernel/signal.c   | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm64/kernel/signal32.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  2 files changed, 72 insertions(+)

Do you want me to queue this patch in the arm64 tree, or is the series all
going together via another route?

Thanks,

Will