Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Thu, 27 May 2021 09:10:31 +0100
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc:     Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
        linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
        Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 07/33] mm: Add folio_get
Message-ID: <YK9T9xXaF6kU0nmU@infradead.org>
References: <20210511214735.1836149-1-willy@infradead.org>
 <20210511214735.1836149-8-willy@infradead.org>
 <88a265ab-9ecd-18b7-c150-517a5c2e5041@suse.cz>
 <YJ6IGgToV1wSv1gg@casper.infradead.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <YJ6IGgToV1wSv1gg@casper.infradead.org>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 03:24:26PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 01:56:46PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> > Nitpick: function names in subject should IMHO also end with (). But not a
> > reason for resend all patches that don't...
> 
> Hm, I thought it was preferred to not do that.  I can fix it
> easily enough when I go through and add the R-b.

I hate the pointless ().  Some maintainers insist on it.   No matter
what you do you'll make some folks happy and others not.