Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp452325pxj; Thu, 27 May 2021 04:20:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyTeY5PoxpyoV4xxwygiYfFLx3lcfarmgBflY8se+wMuQ81MqRNc3PHsZw+pJN0aK/GEJpC X-Received: by 2002:a6b:630c:: with SMTP id p12mr2393036iog.124.1622114442337; Thu, 27 May 2021 04:20:42 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1622114442; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=lxHxldZb18j8S+xGTNp+ljBDl1EKhVoD4ZLPePsE7orM4xJzwiIU3iXlKBbWiHYgdp FBBeUcuFmw0dPYlQw/bKeBNYC6LMAPscBIB5w7jHFv7MWcrw2a3XO4G9esM8M2Bld6dW fmr8OqUR68AR2TN79WAi89Y/5G/Yo2YUyznVE43kb3ZEakMNSWshiCxlJiDRe4SE9/AZ TUkrfq2shXXDLp68d+NG9sO8xizcE2drFfDwTevVTNcYC2DJYgd5LwawTwHSC45pQOU8 iWZ6gMSRLUuW5DGPukzhaYqVACX5KQs2ZUHyV5nALJEZQK8FEueOTSHaMqIO3jq6DzG0 zuLA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=IACQo/vL0ltorXwv7LNqd5yyZeq+u7eoux+f/oR9Miw=; b=v7LkGAqDPH3GgEkOwIax/SMMtA7GmqqrV1gXCyQ3hPmGnYYurCF0CineC6JSj4fLOE QOgWwY4tjK+x9QDGJHZGQn1Geh5Yv282nCINsI1nWDNwlhdPNYs1I1F17LWQVlxwf43Z isiyyY/so0T3h6+WYUz2ezHAQq0RJ8U1Lcl6K6Ahtep1L/FcIRwlVKO1gkglJN1ggisM 1PCKJo0pc2MiAVKnrPPUlvwu+jPbtJjYhCeDe5tmiZ0QKl4uGoiOWi8D9ReSOYb1mWA1 L7USs+7bPxGwPi6wTZ1shcds5Tbds/tA8/aAxG20oHoj7stm9rDC/yihC3bg2Mh13wYV JW7Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a14si2510947ilm.103.2021.05.27.04.20.25; Thu, 27 May 2021 04:20:42 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229740AbhE0LVK (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 27 May 2021 07:21:10 -0400 Received: from elvis.franken.de ([193.175.24.41]:51666 "EHLO elvis.franken.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229657AbhE0LVJ (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 May 2021 07:21:09 -0400 Received: from uucp (helo=alpha) by elvis.franken.de with local-bsmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1lmE34-0007ow-00; Thu, 27 May 2021 13:19:34 +0200 Received: by alpha.franken.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 54C5AC1117; Thu, 27 May 2021 12:36:23 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 12:36:23 +0200 From: Thomas Bogendoerfer To: Geert Uytterhoeven Cc: Rob Herring , Shawn Guo , Linus Walleij , Andy Gross , Bjorn Andersson , "David S . Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" , netdev , linux-arm-msm , "open list:BROADCOM NVRAM DRIVER" , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] MIPS: SEAD3: Correct Ethernet node name Message-ID: <20210527103623.GA8529@alpha.franken.de> References: <20210520150742.GB22843@alpha.franken.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 11:44:27AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 5:08 PM Thomas Bogendoerfer > wrote: > > On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 03:58:38PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > > make dtbs_check: > > > > > > eth@1f010000: $nodename:0: 'eth@1f010000' does not match '^ethernet(@.*)?$' > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven > > > --- > > > arch/mips/boot/dts/mti/sead3.dts | 2 +- > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > Acked-by: Thomas Bogendoerfer > > Can you please take this through the MIPS tree? sure, applied now. Thomas. -- Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]