Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp468546pxj; Thu, 27 May 2021 04:46:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwFDBGlpfgxMJwyNrg2GWB5Rnk7+ahoy8dRACRaxiCsWDtrv5n3JJYD9a5VWHhrjIQhuiUr X-Received: by 2002:a05:6638:2a1:: with SMTP id d1mr3152162jaq.52.1622116000615; Thu, 27 May 2021 04:46:40 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1622116000; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=HErxvHRW+STR6QQH/M/ZM4zJmAjAs/I0yzuoa1IwtUQsREBL6nXPFlVwDpAIcfi0qz ulEICMyUzGwrVYD+RCZhhI15w3nNhDoqdVPE2XWV41+m9GlgiSyA2QQ+pAt38FfzWWI8 9Ugrz6wo+F9hcCx2B01iMeDo5jrLpdhGqzagTYR0l73VvClN5hSAL5JZluMs6yE4JvTo /9KFZSomXua2vGxZySGptYYF+QONJzA9iuEPZKBY49oeB7VHO+m3ZblHPk6S5yiRnVh+ VnBG2WP3BPlOiJPINs1EbclvopP9o+UuDV0oNHJUXhmOk+Jj/1J7OVTQQe6CiL5ayyIL XCRw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=WeAvjAO38pwsmiHMLp0YEomcoigdqpH+SIm3DYxg9Fw=; b=dfN6g22bb0JZWPbdw5Fwqc3L7RuA40By4asLb7wew+0hdxa4nrp4naKC12GUR6Y4N6 JxWuH37gQzpnkQv6Awb2dEAB1yPzprQ6oFkVcZ0aFiQB+nc0PGYii7OFgtUrE3+IjEXV MCOgtLu/hQnHcJbLodv69wAo8LItP8nbjTZ9KnhCycPc+vM12on8aTIQ/gmyOYOy8g8g /6t91/GEU3gWNKm/zAleDMv7QRZwj5NdS3u8XPkVurrBcFDh3oJTTzOzSTrsc/SJG0RE wzWgRzgGEd1oCKw0BhBXsMLZANlt7+nP9iGtQMIKTxsec1gwvaJDaaawBC5/Ug7X89eT xm0w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i35si2911463jav.20.2021.05.27.04.46.19; Thu, 27 May 2021 04:46:40 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234306AbhE0LqW (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 27 May 2021 07:46:22 -0400 Received: from elvis.franken.de ([193.175.24.41]:51722 "EHLO elvis.franken.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234095AbhE0LqS (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 May 2021 07:46:18 -0400 Received: from uucp (helo=alpha) by elvis.franken.de with local-bsmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1lmERG-0007z5-01; Thu, 27 May 2021 13:44:34 +0200 Received: by alpha.franken.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A5FDFC1149; Thu, 27 May 2021 13:42:03 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 27 May 2021 13:42:03 +0200 From: Thomas Bogendoerfer To: zhaoxiao Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org, maoxiaochuan@loongson.cn, jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com, zhangqing@loongson.cn, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] mips: dts: loongson: fix DTC unit name warnings Message-ID: <20210527114203.GB9210@alpha.franken.de> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 05:40:23PM +0800, zhaoxiao wrote: > *** BLURB HERE *** > > zhaoxiao (5): > mips: dts: loongson: fix DTC unit name warnings > mips: dts: loongson: fix DTC unit name warnings > mips: dts: loongson: fix DTC unit name warnings > mips: dts: loongson: fix DTC unit name warnings > mips: dts: loongson: fix DTC unit name warnings > > arch/mips/boot/dts/loongson/loongson64-2k1000.dtsi | 2 +- > arch/mips/boot/dts/loongson/loongson64g-package.dtsi | 4 ++-- > arch/mips/boot/dts/loongson/loongson64v_4core_virtio.dts | 2 +- > arch/mips/boot/dts/loongson/ls7a-pch.dtsi | 2 +- > arch/mips/boot/dts/loongson/rs780e-pch.dtsi | 2 +- > 5 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) series applied to mips-next. Thomas. -- Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]