Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Thu, 27 May 2021 15:26:41 +0000
From:   Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc:     Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        kvm@vger.kernel.org, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
        Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
        Peter Feiner <pfeiner@google.com>,
        Junaid Shahid <junaids@google.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
        Yulei Zhang <yulei.kernel@gmail.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
        Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] More parallel operations for the TDP MMU
Message-ID: <YK+6MdxA61gkxmzP@google.com>
References: <20210401233736.638171-1-bgardon@google.com>
 <c630df18-c1af-8ece-37d2-3db5dc18ecc8@redhat.com>
 <YK6+9lmToiFTpvmq@google.com>
 <822c0a82-2609-bd76-2bb6-43134271bccf@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <822c0a82-2609-bd76-2bb6-43134271bccf@redhat.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, May 27, 2021, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 26/05/21 23:34, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > > Applied to kvm/mmu-notifier-queue, thanks.
> > What's the plan for kvm/mmu-notifier-queue?  More specifically, are the hashes
> > stable, i.e. will non-critical review feedback get squashed?  I was finally
> > getting around to reviewing this, but what's sitting in that branch doesn't
> > appear to be exactly what's posted here.  If the hashes are stable, I'll probably
> > test and review functionality, but not do a thorough review.
> 
> It's all in 5.13 except for the lock elision patch, for which I was waiting
> for a review.  I'll post that patch separately.

Ha, stable indeed.  Thanks!