Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <cover.1622008846.git.matti.vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com>
 <CACRpkdaSr_CV1pKS44Ru15AEJ0-1429+6E7Lei2sPHdaijr9iw@mail.gmail.com>
 <0c2a8ffab666ef31f5cee50b8b47767285dfe829.camel@fi.rohmeurope.com>
 <CACRpkdZ2GdrGr8-XnVvf59O4AVBueBjX0PHYGtOeOdGXi=iE4A@mail.gmail.com> <15d9e565021c115eec268c7fca810799eb503a90.camel@fi.rohmeurope.com>
In-Reply-To: <15d9e565021c115eec268c7fca810799eb503a90.camel@fi.rohmeurope.com>
From:   Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>
Date:   Fri, 28 May 2021 16:31:39 +0200
Message-ID: <CAMpxmJVJAX8jPrYg3=jkG4JqEEnUfpexfn+cFKWJQYpdRJaRUA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] gpio: gpio-regmap: Support few custom operations
To:     "Vaittinen, Matti" <Matti.Vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com>
Cc:     "linus.walleij@linaro.org" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        linux-power <linux-power@fi.rohmeurope.com>,
        "bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com" 
        <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
        "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "michael@walle.cc" <michael@walle.cc>,
        "noltari@gmail.com" <noltari@gmail.com>,
        "jonas.gorski@gmail.com" <jonas.gorski@gmail.com>,
        "f.fainelli@gmail.com" <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        "andy.shevchenko@gmail.com" <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 8:33 AM Vaittinen, Matti
<Matti.Vaittinen@fi.rohmeurope.com> wrote:
>

[snip]

> >
> > What makes things easy for me to maintain is active and happy
> > driver maintainers, so it is paramount that the file looks to Michael
> > like something he wants to keep maintaining. This removes work
> > from me and Bartosz.
>
> I agree. When someone takes care of a driver, he should be happy with
> it. Period. And thanks to Michael for writing this driver and reviewing
> the patches. Reviewing is hard work.
>
> On the other hand, I don't enjoy writing code I am unhappy with either.
> And as this particular piece of code is not a paid task for me, I do
> this for fun. gpio-regmap is not mandatory for my drivers now. So, I'll
> just opt-out from this change. I'll happily use the gpio-regmap where
> it fits, when it fits.
>

I take it that path 2/3 is still good to go?

Bart

[snip]