Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750716AbWKAXoG (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Nov 2006 18:44:06 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750837AbWKAXoG (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Nov 2006 18:44:06 -0500 Received: from smtp-out.google.com ([216.239.33.17]:55466 "EHLO smtp-out.google.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750716AbWKAXoD (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Nov 2006 18:44:03 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=beta; d=google.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to: mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: content-disposition:references; b=IbaMR0LAQkEfrVcSZaKqIhJmhosCC7o1hC7Ph8ZLpGv3GI09ysqgPVa7KT7pPE5ef p5ssjga0bpKLIDpdBEwOQ== Message-ID: <6599ad830611011543k31e6cd51v33b3464d33784e79@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 15:43:52 -0800 From: "Paul Menage" To: "David Rientjes" Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] Resource Management - Infrastructure choices Cc: "Srivatsa Vaddagiri" , "Paul Jackson" , dev@openvz.org, sekharan@us.ibm.com, ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, balbir@in.ibm.com, haveblue@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, matthltc@us.ibm.com, dipankar@in.ibm.com, rohitseth@google.com In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20061030103356.GA16833@in.ibm.com> <20061030031531.8c671815.pj@sgi.com> <6599ad830610300404v1e036bb7o7ed9ec0bc341864e@mail.gmail.com> <20061030042714.fa064218.pj@sgi.com> <6599ad830610300953o7cbf5a6cs95000e11369de427@mail.gmail.com> <20061030123652.d1574176.pj@sgi.com> <6599ad830610301247k179b32f5xa5950d8fc5a3926c@mail.gmail.com> <20061101155937.GA2928@in.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 784 Lines: 17 > > So instead we make the requirement that only one container can be attached > to any given controller. So if container A is attached to a disk I/O > controller, for example, then it includes all processes. If D is attached > to it instead, only p and q are affected by its constraints. If by "controller" you mean "resource node" this looks on second glance very similar in concept to the simplified approach I outlined in my last email. Except that I'd still include a pointer from e.g. D to the resource node for fast lookup. Paul - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/