Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp3355798pxj; Tue, 1 Jun 2021 03:29:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzrjU8iXnnL8rOHrctGXYvYh5oDsyRRCnA4u/X9M07ArbPDEnlX66QRhiVqwHH62+jNZ2CQ X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c913:: with SMTP id b19mr5039531edt.323.1622543343555; Tue, 01 Jun 2021 03:29:03 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1622543343; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ARieErFnRWTQO0IOwN0zDd65TTctIrLTz39VRSiDN6/HqWJm40bUunGoFK10TkDi6j VmTF9R6abhuyQTN5yPYVGjO8+haMSrTB6cxCd2/D0w0CsJKZ9Xt7BxXDWqAh+Z/my25d dPvLpvWJtRBdirjVkPX/H00SoVmTsPjcT3XHHd69nodG8Z2SJ7wLrn/tXri9VsuiKbg9 7MK6afDwETwV/DtyB2IZcW/gmnt/RPt0kv9FPM6eHGR7AixGrOhbbQbwD9cADhuFC1cS Z0W5eaTQ7S2eGSU3dKjmdgyx/IrJaLHkZtGDXA6pYjIKDqhQAS/NfP+3nMTtc7QYdSp9 ispw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from; bh=1sWN5LDKKhzCQfpmNisbR2nv0IQokcwzcewE3QakXZc=; b=CB3+KPcEajgrQUcf0DJMvjCRl62BIOYB/OalW5W/RZrFvRWsOgJe3iVAwhF+NmDZnm kTBuZjrDs4WXi/lp4MahLRFdLMkW7U5dqlxg9/k+WaoiBC6PsW61xKpPWyyOQgbzjJsn 61iOO2D1af3itaig4g/QouGXWsbS1G6le5J9WgBK0B/+VaIyf07BzJ613fGNfk0Ae8mL pwTi3Bicw8IVnqmdhe2FapEz+9AfXhU8pR3mZK/5aj4l7Uwvu29otCyA5uDtXSUxs1B8 1oqYKSAce7BDQ6DHPTN38rCkO8nAQ1o3hwNv9Rn58Pbl2wvkVoSqY8x2OyePoIrtRMqa BdRQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m21si15409838edc.194.2021.06.01.03.28.40; Tue, 01 Jun 2021 03:29:03 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233492AbhFAK1c (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 1 Jun 2021 06:27:32 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:46478 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230308AbhFAK1b (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jun 2021 06:27:31 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44EE511FB; Tue, 1 Jun 2021 03:25:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e113632-lin (usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 422D63F73D; Tue, 1 Jun 2021 03:25:49 -0700 (PDT) From: Valentin Schneider To: Marc Zyngier Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Thomas Gleixner , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Vincenzo Frascino Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 09/10] irqchip/gic: Convert to handle_strict_flow_irq() In-Reply-To: <87wnrks6y5.wl-maz@kernel.org> References: <20210525173255.620606-1-valentin.schneider@arm.com> <20210525173255.620606-10-valentin.schneider@arm.com> <87wnrks6y5.wl-maz@kernel.org> Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2021 11:25:46 +0100 Message-ID: <87pmx5g9ud.mognet@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 27/05/21 13:21, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On Tue, 25 May 2021 18:32:54 +0100, > Valentin Schneider wrote: >> @@ -1116,8 +1116,16 @@ static void gic_init_chip(struct gic_chip_data *gic, struct device *dev, >> >> if (use_eoimode1) { >> gic->chip.irq_mask = gic_eoimode1_mask_irq; >> + gic->chip.irq_ack = gic_eoi_irq; >> gic->chip.irq_eoi = gic_eoimode1_eoi_irq; >> gic->chip.irq_set_vcpu_affinity = gic_irq_set_vcpu_affinity; >> + >> + /* >> + * eoimode0 shouldn't expose FLOW_MASK because the priority >> + * drop is undissociable from the deactivation, and we do need >> + * the priority drop to happen within the flow handler. >> + */ >> + gic->chip.flags |= IRQCHIP_AUTOMASKS_FLOW | IRQCHIP_EOI_THREADED; >> } >> >> if (gic == &gic_data[0]) { > > How about GICv2M, GICv3-MBI, and the collection of widget that build a > domain on top of a GIC domain? I'm worried that they now all need > updating one way or another... > Hmph, that's a good point. It's been a while since I've last stared at the v2m, I'll go try to page that back in. > M. > > -- > Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.