Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp3356214pxj; Tue, 1 Jun 2021 03:29:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwkyOcPcBmFBHTIb95ilpg8lnAJdBlQyaFKc0OWGlPah0Ped//4T0j/QJE9FfyMOBlHriCu X-Received: by 2002:aa7:de99:: with SMTP id j25mr31499353edv.91.1622543383305; Tue, 01 Jun 2021 03:29:43 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1622543383; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=E4msRiit9yQLgsWVP0djrl9wuEbD3/kfPFQvS9hhWsP7FYYM3TNDXRry/6RE2kn/0R Ot9taSRsj7iY3FpBpQ1tsp4yOfotXyO7OGBRXAQ7mlxUbfNEahwd8Ic5mKKnt9YMPBZJ Rm8bwY2mugV9f00rdvkAk2UyvmLsDBu7zspjuy56yNtuGAddz3/DdlBhSyM5Ffx4Tbwp /rbGGH0rarHdkSY6QJzN0Awy8Kw6qLzxgiPkCjUsIMDEQa+3Y8DE0aPOlZLEsqbjkZEh wB5+8Q7Ts/pr9v66ej/KVjJ0mCobmnNs2kY7tRRGGovg9beJQRU2rjvVGLGRNRBReVY2 n6pw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from; bh=1GJoKYjylskiqV+lQD83uLec46lwHjQqdWKK+VW4XxE=; b=wHpQ7nybS3plzEmR9CF6qL1p2Qk3NuvOFX2/OUzm4JDBBhEFiXPIrueq97BxrSlY3d LLmmioIb+qTGfMWbnDc3fQ7L20W/iikxJmS4OU6qaE8ykbF/+XO1F1/wGqxbbzMCxvoB XH5xfTxqwjzLGdk7RMPhNvelILMmtmzmJHoAhzWV5kdVctwMFPnEQmXC0GboFUT7PQEW +DfMBAwq3lIh+HQu+mxh2DY+LH6wvVLm/R/EpbAvVSUXz7pRHo01sINH9X4wEeqydgxJ ooPkuQB4czQmOxwhwaUTRYNZtv8KhG0EmyTTM8REENI+0QtnSBGjjzdPEAgy1yy+Qs8Z DWWA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id jj27si6978079ejc.580.2021.06.01.03.29.21; Tue, 01 Jun 2021 03:29:43 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=arm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233480AbhFAK1L (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 1 Jun 2021 06:27:11 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:46448 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231610AbhFAK1J (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jun 2021 06:27:09 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D42C11FB; Tue, 1 Jun 2021 03:25:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from e113632-lin (usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 85E023F73D; Tue, 1 Jun 2021 03:25:27 -0700 (PDT) From: Valentin Schneider To: Marc Zyngier Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Thomas Gleixner , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Vincenzo Frascino Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 02/10] genirq: Define irq_ack() and irq_eoi() helpers In-Reply-To: <871r9stpd5.wl-maz@kernel.org> References: <20210525173255.620606-1-valentin.schneider@arm.com> <20210525173255.620606-3-valentin.schneider@arm.com> <8735u8tphl.wl-maz@kernel.org> <871r9stpd5.wl-maz@kernel.org> Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2021 11:25:25 +0100 Message-ID: <87sg21g9uy.mognet@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 27/05/21 11:58, Marc Zyngier wrote: > On Thu, 27 May 2021 11:55:50 +0100, > Marc Zyngier wrote: >> >> On Tue, 25 May 2021 18:32:47 +0100, >> Valentin Schneider wrote: >> > diff --git a/kernel/irq/internals.h b/kernel/irq/internals.h >> > index b6c1cceddec0..090bd7868845 100644 >> > --- a/kernel/irq/internals.h >> > +++ b/kernel/irq/internals.h >> > @@ -87,6 +87,8 @@ extern void irq_enable(struct irq_desc *desc); >> > extern void irq_disable(struct irq_desc *desc); >> > extern void irq_percpu_enable(struct irq_desc *desc, unsigned int cpu); >> > extern void irq_percpu_disable(struct irq_desc *desc, unsigned int cpu); >> > +extern void irq_ack(struct irq_desc *desc); >> > +extern void irq_eoi(struct irq_desc *desc); >> >> Nit: we have {un,}mask_irq, but you add irq_{ack,eoi}. It'd be good to >> have some naming consistency (yes, this may/will clash with existing >> code, but we can fix that as well). > > Actually, the helpers do have the right naming, but the internal > declarations are the ones that are wrong... > Doh! > M. > > -- > Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.