Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752476AbWKBCP6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Nov 2006 21:15:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752527AbWKBCP5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Nov 2006 21:15:57 -0500 Received: from junsun.net ([66.29.16.26]:24076 "EHLO junsun.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752476AbWKBCP5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Nov 2006 21:15:57 -0500 Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 18:15:47 -0800 From: Jun Sun To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Can Linux live without DMA zone? Message-ID: <20061102021547.GA1240@srv.junsun.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1086 Lines: 28 I am trying to reserve a block of memory (>16MB) starting from 0 and hide it from kernel. A consequence is that DMA zone now has size 0. That causes many drivers to grief (OOMs). I see two ways out: 1. Modify individual drivers and convince them not to alloc with GFP_DMA. I have been trying to do this but do not seem to see an end of it. :) 2. Simply lie and increase MAX_DMA_ADDRESS to really big (like 1GB) so that the whole memory region belongs to DMA zone. #2 sounds pretty hackish. I am sure something bad will happen sooner or later (like what?). But so far it appears to be working fine. The fundamental question is: Has anybody tried to run Linux without 0 sized DMA zone before? Am I doing something that nobody has done before (which is something really hard to believe these days with Linux :P)? Cheers. Jun - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/