Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To:     Axel Lin <axel.lin@ingics.com>
Cc:     Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@gmail.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
        linux-actions@lists.infradead.org,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFT] regulator: atc260x: Fix n_voltages and min_sel for pickable linear ranges
Date:   Tue,  1 Jun 2021 18:38:00 +0100
Message-Id: <162256901744.20048.14168570824294078184.b4-ty@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20210528123826.350771-1-axel.lin@ingics.com>
References: <20210528123826.350771-1-axel.lin@ingics.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 28 May 2021 20:38:26 +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
> The .n_voltages was missed for pickable linear ranges, fix it.
> The min_sel for each pickable range should be starting from 0.

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] regulator: atc260x: Fix n_voltages and min_sel for pickable linear ranges
      commit: 1963fa67d78674a110bc9b2a8b1e226967692f05

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark