Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp3689593pxj; Tue, 1 Jun 2021 10:53:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwlL1TJtjqNSaaCzxOY2B9QWPmaLy64pZZamKZXvrDbCplkAB5hCOxzEQU3i9fRkvZdRiRL X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:394e:: with SMTP id g14mr14276931eje.3.1622569992481; Tue, 01 Jun 2021 10:53:12 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1622569992; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=FAUhSEsF0L7ZgJ7kOlyhUyA4R01RHmBNc8std3f16boLf2GDmPifVFDAZ5qytmBNuK 4La3Z2cjsxQbKy/QfES3feqRBCclEd5QisrSCk9QzcO7BZVO3ehyMv7azQz6wYRR6pHw Gs2BG76aoNfHx8AFWpSySv6/+ySzsR1uH+EU4DV4cV6Tqau3RBEwwplwji5vdaZ/c7Qh DQycyBlpowtRRJmakm3E9VIcYHoQOw4BUTVC1ZGH9fEaZpjp2RzHk/5jeDQGwfQxLoTV EaIvIh8GiFnoFKaxOLPW9l/vLfSQQoiT9JslOwUgRRCsyVPDjLInv41mnByEDnfiyyIa B40A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=J/D/pM2dOFRPYT+mwScvrTApHkTzuUDFy+gTsyQa8O0=; b=XMqJv3W3cfjzY4H4FLF7fAW4mZm0EEdq+9/vhxJ5QltxwsURn9m2QalCr1ljF7XBBj sp14xcmMJISde8TI8HpPSggJVxLKITc8LAS5EQ3kpQyZUDqLkpS2pHhvtprBAGB5i9dD /dyZZW8CVsL8e6VAGWRBXhZN76ljSJsllbBVr5WvPtUezICkEuL0bqo0jUjTchKJF5OW pIATx0vhziQYC3vNgHhKE6+DiBokBnZb+g15nr7lT1d0yck77q7mZmJ41VxSp52hfAPu V1cf8Avljet31nm7QJTjNBViis5CuWTm6nEZt723IRyPPyF+e6bT4xCuVPoZ2CyJRKEt 8f4g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=w8mvVN5o; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id u21si3828297eds.89.2021.06.01.10.52.49; Tue, 01 Jun 2021 10:53:12 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=w8mvVN5o; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231331AbhFARxd (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 1 Jun 2021 13:53:33 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44648 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231918AbhFARxc (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jun 2021 13:53:32 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-x102c.google.com (mail-pj1-x102c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102c]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08155C06174A for ; Tue, 1 Jun 2021 10:51:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pj1-x102c.google.com with SMTP id h12-20020a17090aa88cb029016400fd8ad8so123584pjq.3 for ; Tue, 01 Jun 2021 10:51:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=J/D/pM2dOFRPYT+mwScvrTApHkTzuUDFy+gTsyQa8O0=; b=w8mvVN5oM0nBwx7bh/RsMWSYCopFlUU1+nl43rL8KERYP2lVeEv4pOM+r9h9YU5KHL K9mIX6fII8D9CDg36dzey/MwcUQ555cY8OnVwMzjB1pCyABz+NjqiD2YcDO3Hw658X+f jE8inXttPkVmRJwHdezNu9LevlTJ4BNY6XQBXZUj6BwFp3zd/0D7zTN5xd6qgjyU9+Kr 13ec/FM0Hvzb0cGmQtnmwhZ2JkLImPS+YW46+7Le5B9sZ3PGnn71mjI53yWx/BRJnI9J +I68b255VVA0p9YjUrxiKpqiKCO5uhsQ57YdkYyFsluyWMP/zuHKYQmfP2AA9AmzVbYh qpxg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=J/D/pM2dOFRPYT+mwScvrTApHkTzuUDFy+gTsyQa8O0=; b=YB7ZRdtN4XlBuMrmC5yBD372BJQ9SmEOdWRtaZFozEhRLcjBubhN2MsYoEOeQpRBsS o5iMUgRspdcCcGW8nGDENPkdOr9EQKuA6jPVh/OSyE0K5pOJ7wmlwaiQp7Q3jnR4Og3S GxUe7dfhn0yhSHarMTtKfAh1oqCwp/CGg6nwWd3oqoFBjCpGMB1hKxWTm8s7FA0JlVxj wNsVTe8GRHLbRj+B4Gk3RDdUfVaNg1I457bXi9bk5NmfHuq7RGRtCuBrNngvhQESI4Dm zkPjIwewm1uYZCOvl0qIGmWQjxa7A/UvSMb2cz61ieZfDIfv2gM2UnEqg7S4kpEBA7o+ L2bw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5333vpxCbx4hQlvU1YFlSu1VlDRw3YjztdELB5dfMOnakCPmP61u U6wNC/ZTPJfKhIt8u81wdxiumA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:71c7:: with SMTP id m7mr1040683pjs.9.1622569910174; Tue, 01 Jun 2021 10:51:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps15 (S0106889e681aac74.cg.shawcable.net. [68.147.0.187]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a2sm13474908pfv.156.2021.06.01.10.51.48 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 01 Jun 2021 10:51:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2021 11:51:47 -0600 From: Mathieu Poirier To: Suman Anna Cc: Bjorn Andersson , Lokesh Vutla , Tero Kristo , linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] remoteproc: k3-r5: Add support for IPC-only mode for all R5Fs Message-ID: <20210601175147.GE1759269@xps15> References: <20210522000309.26134-1-s-anna@ti.com> <20210522000309.26134-5-s-anna@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210522000309.26134-5-s-anna@ti.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 07:03:07PM -0500, Suman Anna wrote: > Add support to the K3 R5F remoteproc driver to configure all the R5F > cores to be either in IPC-only mode or the traditional remoteproc mode. > The IPC-only mode expects that the remote processors are already booted > by the bootloader, and only performs the minimum steps required to > initialize and deinitialize the virtio IPC transports. The remoteproc > mode allows the kernel remoteproc driver to do the regular load and > boot and other device management operations for a R5F core. > > The IPC-only mode for a R5F core is detected and configured at driver > probe time by querying the System Firmware for the R5F power and reset > state and/or status and making sure that the R5F core is indeed started > by the bootloaders, otherwise the device is configured for remoteproc > mode. > > Support for IPC-only mode is achieved through .attach(), .detach() and > .get_loaded_rsc_table() callback ops and various other flags in both > remoteproc core and the K3 R5F remoteproc driver. The resource table > follows a design-by-contract approach and is expected to be at the base > of the DDR firmware region reserved for each remoteproc, it is mostly > expected to contain only the virtio device and trace resource entries. > > NOTE: > The driver cannot configure a R5F core for remoteproc mode by any > means without rebooting the kernel if that R5F core has been started > by a bootloader. > > Signed-off-by: Suman Anna > --- > drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c | 215 +++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 215 insertions(+) Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier I'm out of time for today, more comments tomorrow. > > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c > index e7e1ca71763e..66f0654f0860 100644 > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c > @@ -151,6 +151,7 @@ struct k3_r5_core { > * @core: cached pointer to r5 core structure being used > * @rmem: reserved memory regions data > * @num_rmems: number of reserved memory regions > + * @ipc_only: flag to indicate IPC-only mode > */ > struct k3_r5_rproc { > struct device *dev; > @@ -161,6 +162,7 @@ struct k3_r5_rproc { > struct k3_r5_core *core; > struct k3_r5_mem *rmem; > int num_rmems; > + bool ipc_only; > }; > > /** > @@ -440,6 +442,10 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_prepare(struct rproc *rproc) > bool mem_init_dis; > int ret; > > + /* IPC-only mode does not require the cores to be released from reset */ > + if (kproc->ipc_only) > + return 0; > + > ret = ti_sci_proc_get_status(core->tsp, &boot_vec, &cfg, &ctrl, &stat); > if (ret < 0) > return ret; > @@ -503,6 +509,10 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_unprepare(struct rproc *rproc) > struct device *dev = kproc->dev; > int ret; > > + /* do not put back the cores into reset in IPC-only mode */ > + if (kproc->ipc_only) > + return 0; > + > /* Re-use LockStep-mode reset logic for Single-CPU mode */ > ret = (cluster->mode == CLUSTER_MODE_LOCKSTEP || > cluster->mode == CLUSTER_MODE_SINGLECPU) ? > @@ -538,6 +548,12 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_start(struct rproc *rproc) > u32 boot_addr; > int ret; > > + if (kproc->ipc_only) { > + dev_err(dev, "%s cannot be invoked in IPC-only mode\n", > + __func__); > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > ret = k3_r5_rproc_request_mbox(rproc); > if (ret) > return ret; > @@ -604,9 +620,16 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc) > { > struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv; > struct k3_r5_cluster *cluster = kproc->cluster; > + struct device *dev = kproc->dev; > struct k3_r5_core *core = kproc->core; > int ret; > > + if (kproc->ipc_only) { > + dev_err(dev, "%s cannot be invoked in IPC-only mode\n", > + __func__); > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > /* halt all applicable cores */ > if (cluster->mode == CLUSTER_MODE_LOCKSTEP) { > list_for_each_entry(core, &cluster->cores, elem) { > @@ -635,6 +658,85 @@ static int k3_r5_rproc_stop(struct rproc *rproc) > return ret; > } > > +/* > + * Attach to a running R5F remote processor (IPC-only mode) > + * > + * The R5F attach callback only needs to request the mailbox, the remote > + * processor is already booted, so there is no need to issue any TI-SCI > + * commands to boot the R5F cores in IPC-only mode. > + */ > +static int k3_r5_rproc_attach(struct rproc *rproc) > +{ > + struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv; > + struct device *dev = kproc->dev; > + int ret; > + > + if (!kproc->ipc_only || rproc->state != RPROC_DETACHED) { > + dev_err(dev, "R5F is expected to be in IPC-only mode and RPROC_DETACHED state\n"); > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > + ret = k3_r5_rproc_request_mbox(rproc); > + if (ret) > + return ret; > + > + dev_err(dev, "R5F core initialized in IPC-only mode\n"); > + return 0; > +} > + > +/* > + * Detach from a running R5F remote processor (IPC-only mode) > + * > + * The R5F detach callback performs the opposite operation to attach callback > + * and only needs to release the mailbox, the R5F cores are not stopped and > + * will be left in booted state in IPC-only mode. > + */ > +static int k3_r5_rproc_detach(struct rproc *rproc) > +{ > + struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv; > + struct device *dev = kproc->dev; > + > + if (!kproc->ipc_only || rproc->state != RPROC_ATTACHED) { > + dev_err(dev, "R5F is expected to be in IPC-only mode and RPROC_ATTACHED state\n"); > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > + mbox_free_channel(kproc->mbox); > + dev_err(dev, "R5F core deinitialized in IPC-only mode\n"); > + return 0; > +} > + > +/* > + * This function implements the .get_loaded_rsc_table() callback and is used > + * to provide the resource table for the booted R5F in IPC-only mode. The K3 R5F > + * firmwares follow a design-by-contract approach and are expected to have the > + * resource table at the base of the DDR region reserved for firmware usage. > + * This provides flexibility for the remote processor to be booted by different > + * bootloaders that may or may not have the ability to publish the resource table > + * address and size through a DT property. > + */ > +static struct resource_table *k3_r5_get_loaded_rsc_table(struct rproc *rproc, > + size_t *rsc_table_sz) > +{ > + struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv; > + struct device *dev = kproc->dev; > + > + if (!kproc->rmem[0].cpu_addr) { > + dev_err(dev, "memory-region #1 does not exist, loaded rsc table can't be found"); > + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); > + } > + > + /* > + * NOTE: The resource table size is currently hard-coded to a maximum > + * of 256 bytes. The most common resource table usage for K3 firmwares > + * is to only have the vdev resource entry and an optional trace entry. > + * The exact size could be computed based on resource table address, but > + * the hard-coded value suffices to support the IPC-only mode. > + */ > + *rsc_table_sz = 256; > + return (struct resource_table *)kproc->rmem[0].cpu_addr; > +} > + > /* > * Internal Memory translation helper > * > @@ -709,8 +811,11 @@ static const struct rproc_ops k3_r5_rproc_ops = { > .unprepare = k3_r5_rproc_unprepare, > .start = k3_r5_rproc_start, > .stop = k3_r5_rproc_stop, > + .attach = k3_r5_rproc_attach, > + .detach = k3_r5_rproc_detach, > .kick = k3_r5_rproc_kick, > .da_to_va = k3_r5_rproc_da_to_va, > + .get_loaded_rsc_table = k3_r5_get_loaded_rsc_table, > }; > > /* > @@ -1014,6 +1119,109 @@ static void k3_r5_adjust_tcm_sizes(struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc) > } > } > > +/* > + * This function checks and configures a R5F core for IPC-only or remoteproc > + * mode. The driver is configured to be in IPC-only mode for a R5F core when > + * the core has been loaded and started by a bootloader. The IPC-only mode is > + * detected by querying the System Firmware for reset, power on and halt status > + * and ensuring that the core is running. Any incomplete steps at bootloader > + * are validated and errored out. > + * > + * In IPC-only mode, the driver state flags for ATCM, BTCM and LOCZRAMA settings > + * and cluster mode parsed originally from kernel DT are updated to reflect the > + * actual values configured by bootloader. The driver internal device memory > + * addresses for TCMs are also updated. > + */ > +static int k3_r5_rproc_configure_mode(struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc) > +{ > + struct k3_r5_cluster *cluster = kproc->cluster; > + struct k3_r5_core *core = kproc->core; > + struct device *cdev = core->dev; > + bool r_state = false, c_state = false; > + u32 ctrl = 0, cfg = 0, stat = 0, halted = 0; > + u64 boot_vec = 0; > + u32 atcm_enable, btcm_enable, loczrama; > + struct k3_r5_core *core0; > + enum cluster_mode mode; > + int ret; > + > + core0 = list_first_entry(&cluster->cores, struct k3_r5_core, elem); > + > + ret = core->ti_sci->ops.dev_ops.is_on(core->ti_sci, core->ti_sci_id, > + &r_state, &c_state); > + if (ret) { > + dev_err(cdev, "failed to get initial state, mode cannot be determined, ret = %d\n", > + ret); > + return ret; > + } > + if (r_state != c_state) { > + dev_warn(cdev, "R5F core may have been powered on by a different host, programmed state (%d) != actual state (%d)\n", > + r_state, c_state); > + } > + > + ret = reset_control_status(core->reset); > + if (ret < 0) { > + dev_err(cdev, "failed to get initial local reset status, ret = %d\n", > + ret); > + return ret; > + } > + > + ret = ti_sci_proc_get_status(core->tsp, &boot_vec, &cfg, &ctrl, > + &stat); > + if (ret < 0) { > + dev_err(cdev, "failed to get initial processor status, ret = %d\n", > + ret); > + return ret; > + } > + atcm_enable = cfg & PROC_BOOT_CFG_FLAG_R5_ATCM_EN ? 1 : 0; > + btcm_enable = cfg & PROC_BOOT_CFG_FLAG_R5_BTCM_EN ? 1 : 0; > + loczrama = cfg & PROC_BOOT_CFG_FLAG_R5_TCM_RSTBASE ? 1 : 0; > + if (cluster->soc_data->single_cpu_mode) { > + mode = cfg & PROC_BOOT_CFG_FLAG_R5_SINGLE_CORE ? > + CLUSTER_MODE_SINGLECPU : CLUSTER_MODE_SPLIT; > + } else { > + mode = cfg & PROC_BOOT_CFG_FLAG_R5_LOCKSTEP ? > + CLUSTER_MODE_LOCKSTEP : CLUSTER_MODE_SPLIT; > + } > + halted = ctrl & PROC_BOOT_CTRL_FLAG_R5_CORE_HALT; > + > + /* > + * IPC-only mode detection requires both local and module resets to > + * be deasserted and R5F core to be unhalted. Local reset status is > + * irrelevant if module reset is asserted (POR value has local reset > + * deasserted), and is deemed as remoteproc mode > + */ > + if (c_state && !ret && !halted) { > + dev_err(cdev, "configured R5F for IPC-only mode\n"); > + kproc->rproc->state = RPROC_DETACHED; > + kproc->rproc->detach_on_shutdown = true; > + kproc->ipc_only = true; > + ret = 1; > + } else if (!c_state) { > + dev_err(cdev, "configured R5F for remoteproc mode\n"); > + ret = 0; > + } else { > + dev_err(cdev, "mismatched mode: local_reset = %s, module_reset = %s, core_state = %s\n", > + !ret ? "deasserted" : "asserted", > + c_state ? "deasserted" : "asserted", > + halted ? "halted" : "unhalted"); > + ret = -EINVAL; > + } > + > + /* fixup TCMs, cluster & core flags to actual values in IPC-only mode */ > + if (ret > 0) { > + if (core == core0) > + cluster->mode = mode; > + core->atcm_enable = atcm_enable; > + core->btcm_enable = btcm_enable; > + core->loczrama = loczrama; > + core->mem[0].dev_addr = loczrama ? 0 : K3_R5_TCM_DEV_ADDR; > + core->mem[1].dev_addr = loczrama ? K3_R5_TCM_DEV_ADDR : 0; > + } > + > + return ret; > +} > + > static int k3_r5_cluster_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev) > { > struct k3_r5_cluster *cluster = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); > @@ -1054,6 +1262,12 @@ static int k3_r5_cluster_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev) > kproc->rproc = rproc; > core->rproc = rproc; > > + ret = k3_r5_rproc_configure_mode(kproc); > + if (ret < 0) > + goto err_config; > + if (ret) > + goto init_rmem; > + > ret = k3_r5_rproc_configure(kproc); > if (ret) { > dev_err(dev, "initial configure failed, ret = %d\n", > @@ -1061,6 +1275,7 @@ static int k3_r5_cluster_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev) > goto err_config; > } > > +init_rmem: > k3_r5_adjust_tcm_sizes(kproc); > > ret = k3_r5_reserved_mem_init(kproc); > -- > 2.30.1 >