Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In-Reply-To: <YJotlJBJ1CVAgvMT@mwanda>
References: <YJotlJBJ1CVAgvMT@mwanda>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: qcom: cleanup some dev_err_probe() calls
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
To:     Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Date:   Tue, 01 Jun 2021 16:34:31 -0700
Message-ID: <162259047131.4130789.3552758881567534695@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
User-Agent: alot/0.9.1
Precedence: bulk

Quoting Dan Carpenter (2021-05-11 00:09:08)
> The dev_err_probe() function prints an error message if the error
> code is not -EPROBE_DEFER.  If we know the error code in is -ENODEV
> then there is no reason to check.  Conversely, we do not need to
> check for -EPROBE_DEFER before calling.
>=20
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> ---

Applied to clk-next with some manual effort