Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 2 Jun 2021 16:24:59 +0530
From:   Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To:     Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc:     Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org>,
        Stephan Gerhold <stephan@gerhold.net>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
        Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
        DTML <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
        Roja Rani Yarubandi <rojay@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: power: Introduce
 'assigned-performance-states' property
Message-ID: <20210602105459.t3ptci42lgvrzqlx@vireshk-i7>
References: <1622095949-2014-1-git-send-email-rnayak@codeaurora.org>
 <1622095949-2014-2-git-send-email-rnayak@codeaurora.org>
 <YLYV3ov/iBffZMg4@gerhold.net>
 <20210601114426.3vhh2twocqx254b6@vireshk-i7>
 <CAPDyKFqmBoMwQkWHT-w8A2=PeXeDgxE8n=D4prdEyuxM+ZOAaA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAPDyKFqmBoMwQkWHT-w8A2=PeXeDgxE8n=D4prdEyuxM+ZOAaA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716-391-311a52
Precedence: bulk

On 02-06-21, 12:45, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> Alright, so it looks like we already have the DT binding that we need for this.
> 
> That leaves us with the question, at what place should we parse it
> (call of_get_required_opp_performance_state()) and set the performance
> state for the device?
> 
> Does it still make sense to do it while attaching the device to the
> genpd, you think?

For parsing, yes this is the right place. For getting that into
effect, whenever the device is supposed to work, i.e. with runtime PM
somehow.

-- 
viresh