Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 12 Nov 2001 08:56:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 12 Nov 2001 08:56:27 -0500 Received: from thebsh.namesys.com ([212.16.0.238]:13834 "HELO thebsh.namesys.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Mon, 12 Nov 2001 08:56:23 -0500 Message-ID: <3BEFD4E0.6050708@namesys.com> Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 16:55:44 +0300 From: Hans Reiser User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20010923 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: arjanv@redhat.com CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yura@namesys.com Subject: Re: Oops in reiserfs w/2.4.7-10 In-Reply-To: <3BEFBDE0.6080804@namesys.com> <3BEFC301.A92C64D4@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Arjan van de Ven wrote: >>Please upgrade to a recent linus kernel. I don't know what went into >>RedHat 7.2, but secondhand reports are that reiserfs is not stable in >>that kernel. >> > >Please stop badmouthing people that don't happen to pay you. (and don't >mis-spell their name). > >The Red Hat Linux 7.2 kernels don't have reiserfs patches so all bugs >are >yours and yours alone..... > > If I understand correctly that it is 2.4.7 that went in, and there were no memory manager or vfs patches, then you are almost surely correct, and it probably has some relatively rare bugs fixed recently but is reasonably stable on the whole. He should still upgrade to a recent Linus kernel though. Yura, have you tested this kernel yet? Do you recognize this bug as a fixed bug? Hans - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/