Message-ID: <454A1D82.7040709@cfl.rr.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 11:32:02 -0500
From: Phillip Susi <psusi@cfl.rr.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jun Sun <jsun@junsun.net>
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Can Linux live without DMA zone?
References: <20061102021547.GA1240@srv.junsun.net>
In-Reply-To: <20061102021547.GA1240@srv.junsun.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1283
Lines: 32

Shouldn't only ancient ISA drivers be using GFP_DMA?  You know, ones 
that actually require it?  PCI drivers should not have this limit.

Jun Sun wrote:
> I am trying to reserve a block of memory (>16MB) starting from 0 and hide it 
> from kernel.  A consequence is that DMA zone now has size 0.  That causes
> many drivers to grief (OOMs).
> 
> I see two ways out:
> 
> 1. Modify individual drivers and convince them not to alloc with GFP_DMA.
>    I have been trying to do this but do not seem to see an end of it.  :)
> 
> 2. Simply lie and increase MAX_DMA_ADDRESS to really big (like 1GB) so that
>    the whole memory region belongs to DMA zone.
> 
> #2 sounds pretty hackish.  I am sure something bad will happen
> sooner or later (like what?). But so far it appears to be working fine.
> 
> The fundamental question is: Has anybody tried to run Linux without 0 sized
> DMA zone before?  Am I doing something that nobody has done before (which is
> something really hard to believe these days with Linux :P)?
> 
> Cheers.
> 
> Jun

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/