Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 2 Jun 2021 20:30:58 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To:     Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Cc:     Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan 
        <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
        Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
        Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <knsathya@kernel.org>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
        Raj Ashok <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v2-fix-v2 1/1] x86: Introduce generic protected guest
 abstraction
Message-ID: <YLfOYvv89X+wCLJv@zn.tnic>
References: <20210527042356.3983284-2-sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
 <20210601211417.2177598-1-sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
 <dfb6b319-97ad-4c16-67ae-de4ce4ef415b@amd.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <dfb6b319-97ad-4c16-67ae-de4ce4ef415b@amd.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 01:19:07PM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> This certainly doesn't capture all of the situations where true would need
> to be returned. For example, SEV, but not SEV-ES, requires that string I/O
> be unrolled, etc.

Yeah, I believe this would be better done for you guys, ontop, as you
know best what needs to be queried where. So this first patch adding
only a stub should be fine. Or you or someone else does the conversion
ontop of the Intel patch and then all patches go together.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette