Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp800894pxj; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 11:45:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzyeCbEV3WusJkfogD6b4BPK2KMMAAF5td6k8PeEeuIpeu1f9tKLsnc5wroQ5N+qcrGeipS X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:1a25:: with SMTP id be5mr30911308edb.369.1622659516091; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 11:45:16 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1622659516; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=IC0HTMF33FxeHVCm7XjQsESXk95W8rOA52ieVOerbpypc/M+nFtQ/n4psVD099LPim KxWWkzY6ZkYwnUA+gYL0c9s1lnf/4XGDEhsC7rLFxuJ/SSRkwyL73RL2bl89FGr5Gk2Q y9L1nJdQrBBXeFIbj1vARqRqap3WABuSYVK95NXIP2oudH6XsgY1B/4vU1Ja1qcj4RON H4XFt7CQMqmZl3K7IrjG10fEbdKx6TlYFfESxbDzb3/olcSAqIC3ifiiUL5+7TeMYpQN 166+RjiWXEqzzHoDoVVqJGsVS2P8jU1uyygahKuNnrFWhnxQy5ra7AVgbSd/chdrBX3y L8ww== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:subject:mime-version:message-id:date:user-agent :references:in-reply-to:cc:to:from; bh=jUOuwZSA0bSiRRuLxhPMMY1CwkSeid0dtBectJ+iGQA=; b=G+QY1zfUgc3+OJx8FfpoKJVZDxH8JO+DGzb7Wx9Bsg+Ut/n5TuYIiLs5D1oSovNdri SIdUC7JsjIGlLZQlxb9eHwddBJmNXRL29F3bygODIOlcwWxH/mRHs/13ySW3zyA1w9I3 //Qk9CECSMTn/dI1jJaCxFxCUC5iaqGKB5eQ24rsAZ0qEVJ9un0pziiIeOJnD/Wk8gwg xBPxHlMLEtOYb8TU8EW4vfs56SFOP2SSNtpUKaWCwYKM4RLDj31zURc4ACjpwkCK8PBX 00+KTGwWLySfBoIwjUOpERjLY4QSN8NBcqNslE3kezzRqbqa5ovOn//LxJ2uujoLksWB AyaQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=xmission.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a14si477102edy.464.2021.06.02.11.44.53; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 11:45:16 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=xmission.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229553AbhFBSoj (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 2 Jun 2021 14:44:39 -0400 Received: from out03.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.233]:48390 "EHLO out03.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229541AbhFBSoi (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jun 2021 14:44:38 -0400 Received: from in02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.52]) by out03.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1loVpL-00G6Zj-Ds; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 12:42:51 -0600 Received: from ip68-227-160-95.om.om.cox.net ([68.227.160.95] helo=email.xmission.com) by in02.mta.xmission.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1loVpG-00Dbdm-VU; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 12:42:51 -0600 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Jiashuo Liang Cc: Dave Hansen , Andy Lutomirski , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Borislav Petkov , x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20210601085203.40214-1-liangjs@pku.edu.cn> (Jiashuo Liang's message of "Tue, 1 Jun 2021 16:52:03 +0800") References: <20210601085203.40214-1-liangjs@pku.edu.cn> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) Date: Wed, 02 Jun 2021 13:42:22 -0500 Message-ID: <87wnrcqfap.fsf@disp2133> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-XM-SPF: eid=1loVpG-00Dbdm-VU;;;mid=<87wnrcqfap.fsf@disp2133>;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=68.227.160.95;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX1/RFpTRdnELpHk43fPsNaIe6o6GVXXfTp0= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 68.227.160.95 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa02.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.5 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE,T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG,T_TooManySym_01, T_TooManySym_02,XMSubLong autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Virus: No X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.4700] * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa02 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] * 0.0 T_TooManySym_01 4+ unique symbols in subject * 0.0 T_TooManySym_02 5+ unique symbols in subject X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa02 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ;Jiashuo Liang X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 3822 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.04 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 4.5 (0.1%), b_tie_ro: 3.2 (0.1%), parse: 1.05 (0.0%), extract_message_metadata: 14 (0.4%), get_uri_detail_list: 1.56 (0.0%), tests_pri_-1000: 12 (0.3%), tests_pri_-950: 1.03 (0.0%), tests_pri_-900: 0.80 (0.0%), tests_pri_-90: 137 (3.6%), check_bayes: 135 (3.5%), b_tokenize: 4.9 (0.1%), b_tok_get_all: 5 (0.1%), b_comp_prob: 1.47 (0.0%), b_tok_touch_all: 120 (3.1%), b_finish: 0.79 (0.0%), tests_pri_0: 222 (5.8%), check_dkim_signature: 0.36 (0.0%), check_dkim_adsp: 2.7 (0.1%), poll_dns_idle: 3409 (89.2%), tests_pri_10: 2.2 (0.1%), tests_pri_500: 3426 (89.6%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: [PATCH] signal/x86: Don't send SIGSEGV twice on SEGV_PKUERR X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Sat, 08 Feb 2020 21:53:50 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jiashuo Liang writes: > Before this patch, the __bad_area_nosemaphore function calls both > force_sig_pkuerr and force_sig_fault when handling SEGV_PKUERR. This does > not cause problems because the second signal is filtered by the > legacy_queue check in __send_signal. But it causes the kernel to do > unnecessary work. > > This patch should fix it. Have you been able to test this patch? Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" Does one of the x86 maintainers want to pick up this trivial fix or should I pick it up? Eric > Fixes: 9db812dbb29d ("signal/x86: Call force_sig_pkuerr from __bad_area_nosemaphore") > Suggested-by: "Eric W. Biederman" > Signed-off-by: Jiashuo Liang > --- > arch/x86/mm/fault.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c > index 1c548ad00752..6bda7f67d737 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c > +++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c > @@ -836,8 +836,8 @@ __bad_area_nosemaphore(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code, > > if (si_code == SEGV_PKUERR) > force_sig_pkuerr((void __user *)address, pkey); > - > - force_sig_fault(SIGSEGV, si_code, (void __user *)address); > + else > + force_sig_fault(SIGSEGV, si_code, (void __user *)address); > > local_irq_disable(); > }