Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp983247pxj; Wed, 2 Jun 2021 17:11:07 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx3fIGxq+ijOyfU9RjBEE+J9AkhmZZ+wEOrMyqHW0grvdcP3d0wgMAz4XCfrqEaBXsTwind X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:274b:: with SMTP id z11mr22930088edd.225.1622679066925; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 17:11:06 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1622679066; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=yfyyBqthMJwSsuYaT8q5PF8mPpVMS2hgSwGBOFDMA+WejqCmtNiaJazH9WtniqYI89 BS+T/eA+x06AKtUiC+yfDNYG+l5v1rFdzmpy+zmBw8pe1Yr36kad8bRqaVvwvSYwzusH uXYmg762f6MoKFKvEtwb/YOBviCcLFFGpR8bxpq5B+lbld9KaftRMTWTApvBuoYV5zeQ AcoUpuuvB/r/gjG/V8u7NPint8kAk00bSo7UqzGmcWfdwSiQ9rDHUMRKji+iSS4j6qPZ cT0IFYSGgfV/wGyRzoLn7Qhf0H8JfJrV3iGFTGhcYdQgcQNMy5sZFw1bn8kY+VU0dZsw nbAQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=v9TFuqUMq/k60JKSCAwSr1veIDdXtfQJPUfWX3pA8Mg=; b=EzlaFLWovqSTw8YXndAF53zfkuA0Cf03KVfn5btk2tCr9Ssi1Q1ptUt8D3cKyUYnh4 gfzDyPOpAEzUoF4HdHPFKt0kucBYD94o/MqLCPqX+EUkNyTQrVdTKEsBF4tiGb+RuEJI dhTX8aPoTy1cgCOGmKRO9R8UlxOZYei17yLVUxd6K3ywFitXoMnRBzNTxN8jzOeThjvD DTouJ9W6ZF0NVhvHjIUWsorvyZDaGYnoJN1KFTBXUViBf8f5haUhMjYEd1QawY2O6dGH PoR0pg3sm8YfNgs6UL8LuPgBhtiF+SAoK6+qbi5SElP4aAsQVvFB2LB+6qMTIhrX/HuM o8gg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=Y5JQuEDa; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m2si855375ejk.237.2021.06.02.17.10.44; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 17:11:06 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=Y5JQuEDa; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229665AbhFCALj (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 2 Jun 2021 20:11:39 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:42833 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229541AbhFCALj (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Jun 2021 20:11:39 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1622678994; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=v9TFuqUMq/k60JKSCAwSr1veIDdXtfQJPUfWX3pA8Mg=; b=Y5JQuEDa+vPaIEMrJdDKbjoBw0PVDQCsmWYVIaTviZQpHHorQVFja8HsuzAARmNd7eijw6 2+UgeOf4AJJ5Hq6v7I4dDEhRcZ0is1DyQy9qDWL8+1ahd/twp9jDTQpBic3/WwWFYWf7Ns WZoYbAkbdXbbTyqvCxDLl/oZ3ylx1NQ= Received: from mail-qk1-f197.google.com (mail-qk1-f197.google.com [209.85.222.197]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-481-k4yTtMn_O1igEdWRYzoByw-1; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 20:09:53 -0400 X-MC-Unique: k4yTtMn_O1igEdWRYzoByw-1 Received: by mail-qk1-f197.google.com with SMTP id k125-20020a3788830000b02903a65618d46cso2951900qkd.3 for ; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 17:09:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=v9TFuqUMq/k60JKSCAwSr1veIDdXtfQJPUfWX3pA8Mg=; b=n1plZFMgwXz021Ykfb7HUYMrkElrKsc9CCkOQ+TKjYjFIjQfrmHApDboW8rDwX/miy 4DnTKGue7fvc4Tn2H3EnTx8yBM8aA3DfPMVZ10N2YTICqY7ru+1IdrEC6HDQsL3gqMFe E+TtQrkhCci9CzOLkTOdwZmcZvzHWpuIiyE7tFZax2rOjAXbwq1G5pcAHS8FEsFF0nC3 x21QyB3DFixEYvgSw3j7tpyXkN8OLpR5iYJqZH51OelW7CB5gS4lP2sqYSqMLi98xIkg rqqW2TDOMIJxmpa0XlvU9mY9cOv73ldXmZHsOEdTE/jALcWI0Tr1vb2UUaNsAOIljqk/ 7vJg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530AVEv0QImyqGzTsyWuP6ynvCKeHge2xiWmzrloy1BNSUKVqyHn F9vnBAtbAZFpISrv0qaZJIey1HO8IPF1lDPlKpXYgU1vKWDkVZi4sY/wp/rQCPdz+6IhgWAjxbU bZoojtbP7w2FTt9bbCJ0curb0 X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:258d:: with SMTP id fq13mr31503105qvb.50.1622678993183; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 17:09:53 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a05:6214:258d:: with SMTP id fq13mr31503079qvb.50.1622678992928; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 17:09:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from t490s (bras-base-toroon474qw-grc-61-184-147-118-108.dsl.bell.ca. [184.147.118.108]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c12sm277980qtv.83.2021.06.02.17.09.51 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 02 Jun 2021 17:09:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2021 20:09:50 -0400 From: Peter Xu To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Axel Rasmussen , "Kirill A . Shutemov" , Hugh Dickins , Miaohe Lin , Mike Rapoport , Jerome Glisse , Andrea Arcangeli , Nadav Amit , Mike Kravetz , Jason Gunthorpe , Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/27] userfaultfd-wp: Support shmem and hugetlbfs Message-ID: References: <20210527201927.29586-1-peterx@redhat.com> <20210602153606.93cfe1dfdaa2e11a2d863df2@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210602153606.93cfe1dfdaa2e11a2d863df2@linux-foundation.org> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 02, 2021 at 03:36:06PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 2 Jun 2021 10:40:04 -0400 Peter Xu wrote: > > > On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 04:19:00PM -0400, Peter Xu wrote: > > > This is v3 of uffd-wp shmem & hugetlbfs support, which completes uffd-wp as a > > > kernel full feature, as it only supports anonymous before this series. It's > > > based on latest v5.13-rc3-mmots-2021-05-25-20-12. > > > > Andrew, > > > > Any suggestion on how I should move on with this series? > > > > It is large, and thinly reviewed. I haven't seriously looked at it > yet. If nothing much else happens I might toss it in there for some > additional exposure but I do think more input from other developers is > needed before we go further. It's just that the 1st RFC series was posted ~6 months ago and the major things should be mostly the same since then (we've got a few patches merged; but mostly for the sake of dependencies of other projects): https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210115170907.24498-1-peterx@redhat.com/ So I start to doubt whether I should ask you for help (after bothering at least Mike and Hugh already :), as I have very little confidence that this series will be reviewed thoroughly in the near future if I do nothing. But I definitely agree with you, it's still relatively large changeset with not so much review done. Let's keep it there for some more time, then. Thanks, -- Peter Xu