Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 12 Nov 2001 09:24:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 12 Nov 2001 09:24:08 -0500 Received: from twilight.cs.hut.fi ([130.233.40.5]:23346 "EHLO twilight.cs.hut.fi") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 12 Nov 2001 09:23:50 -0500 Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 16:23:37 +0200 From: Ville Herva To: Alan Cox Cc: Patrick Caulfield , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-lvm@sistina.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] lvm in 2.4.15.pre3 Message-ID: <20011112162337.J26218@niksula.cs.hut.fi> In-Reply-To: <20011112130101.A11020@tykepenguin.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk on Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 01:19:01PM +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 01:19:01PM +0000, you [Alan Cox] claimed: > > Please apply the following patch to LVM in 2.4.13pre3. > > > > It looks like the LVM patch that came from Alan calls alloc/free_kiovec_sz() > > functions which only exist in his tree. > > Just sent Linus the same thing 8) Sorry if this is a FAQ, but I see the LVM in .15pre3 is 0.9.1beta2. Are there plans to merge something newer like 1.0.1pre4? What about Andreas Dilger's fixes? Do they get the pre3 LVM closer to 1.0.1pre4? -- v -- v@iki.fi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/