Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp100656pxj; Thu, 3 Jun 2021 01:47:48 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwQceb3vcknkhO38a3X82jQo+mnfYHXojgGMv4sdQ1SBbyG5xLcYoIf8v3nwmS5R/NO+X/r X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:c247:: with SMTP id bl7mr39131243ejb.288.1622710067971; Thu, 03 Jun 2021 01:47:47 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1622710067; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=kyitmDjTJCq8NihmBWLFwC/RrXjsJJihMNNSuXGMYlxYy1isQKVO/B49GN16QIiGDl D9IKqFUi5u+NoCCHMaCeBf//l7csgZOY6NTN+NHpX7vfki4jsW5HaweX+W4QjwkFXn6i 4fJaZd93imZxIvCbETACoLUHItpFHTEUydFH0ezCwJa8IRJd88suAz7C2Y8D3b/XP3G0 0GqvU6p8aSrzY8XFzlYGvYqAnbM3S6CcaD7vJ4pQxLzUd7N8W6leUGTsuR9lF7o9DvsI ebZ8S+ZGgSojlGlw1F/HTMlTd2Ydmf1dsRvricVexYiuoe8MdSy3CI9Zmixi6FEkCvMO c4sQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature:dkim-signature; bh=ELnKKz0+YVWYJ7VvosZlvotDsRWzrVe+LH1Y4DNaxzg=; b=UMFPbq2FOTZatkItNQeVy6qrXuo49hme0iiP+JJQr+PgX1jBL1bYbGQ64p9szKbFFm xh2eAO0D+hAhPX7jvNjkS3ipdO51CgY/I9TeFzqrYqJCl/xAxPxtYYiG4NoZHWhqRg3S 7NON+CRGsa951jEaq6iWqCyJhH/FAoC6i24YLDS8sndSMWta/IUMQ2q2vVRnK6k3qykT lmBnrqPK4hApoMIhIn9SiVtE4iGiS2+pEcmjlVP9cDs0/L1YPCqVZ4zZ/swYxn1boTxv z2SBSvHNRXAeb7jcAL6pQGUXwKhk3qSIBysU/XbRCp0bTtaVAJThTmCEc4NTPRTP5gmM 279A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=U3KOueh0; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id hd11si1754215ejc.83.2021.06.03.01.47.25; Thu, 03 Jun 2021 01:47:47 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@suse.cz header.s=susede2_rsa header.b=U3KOueh0; dkim=neutral (no key) header.i=@suse.cz header.s=susede2_ed25519; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229810AbhFCIpK (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 3 Jun 2021 04:45:10 -0400 Received: from smtp-out2.suse.de ([195.135.220.29]:39088 "EHLO smtp-out2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229576AbhFCIpK (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jun 2021 04:45:10 -0400 Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [149.44.160.134]) by smtp-out2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BF0B1FD4D; Thu, 3 Jun 2021 08:43:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1622709805; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ELnKKz0+YVWYJ7VvosZlvotDsRWzrVe+LH1Y4DNaxzg=; b=U3KOueh0zJApA/W05EWokttiRW+E9xLbQqKnavasQ0MAEmSS+weh06c3Cy+E+Icv3fmzNG CoX61cOFp4skQO0A0TOAvWrNH01n6PVZpY0d2TdSyAitK390SH3Xmj7KuUdObt/+GaGVEY WzmvLghD3XZWfHEBETStly3UueU/YDo= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1622709805; h=from:from:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc: mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ELnKKz0+YVWYJ7VvosZlvotDsRWzrVe+LH1Y4DNaxzg=; b=eOzAoHDppsFTa2f4/wqILv4EEwrmCowNhDuxL8YyOfNOYqKmS5XwEbK+1weeKdgxkN5y/c wqye3OXeJBGA8kBA== Received: from quack2.suse.cz (unknown [10.100.200.198]) by relay2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1448FA3B88; Thu, 3 Jun 2021 08:43:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by quack2.suse.cz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E4E3E1F2C98; Thu, 3 Jun 2021 10:43:24 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2021 10:43:24 +0200 From: Jan Kara To: Amir Goldstein Cc: kernel test robot , Jan Kara , Matthew Bobrowski , Christian Brauner , LKML , lkp@lists.01.org, kbuild test robot , ying.huang@intel.com, feng.tang@intel.com, zhengjun.xing@linux.intel.com, linux-fsdevel Subject: Re: [fanotify] a8b98c808e: stress-ng.fanotify.ops_per_sec 32.2% improvement Message-ID: <20210603084324.GC23647@quack2.suse.cz> References: <20210603015314.GA21290@xsang-OptiPlex-9020> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu 03-06-21 09:57:15, Amir Goldstein wrote: > On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 4:36 AM kernel test robot wrote: > > > > > > > > Greeting, > > > > FYI, we noticed a 32.2% improvement of stress-ng.fanotify.ops_per_sec due to commit: > > > > > > commit: a8b98c808eab3ec8f1b5a64be967b0f4af4cae43 ("fanotify: fix permission model of unprivileged group") > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master > > > > > > I guess now we know what caused the reported regression: > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210511124632.GL24154@quack2.suse.cz/ > > I didn't know that capable() is so significant. Yeah, I wouldn't guess either. Interesting. Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR