Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp288960pxj; Thu, 3 Jun 2021 06:48:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwe8TpDf1aadlwiBfPOGhTBSYx6FuBXWbVBtMlkPi+ZMKjE0eBTZvAFFRp/1xmfl3Ybvazu X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:138c:: with SMTP id b12mr44207163edv.268.1622728095710; Thu, 03 Jun 2021 06:48:15 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1622728095; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=q32qCiYSg20yW0QFitz00Cm6WXmKbyPzD/7EwcA2Kkpmwj2NyOIFQa3pTN2pd5XWuV 3Q0AcaD1mlL2gM+va+kjXsmAF/zNnv2U4MFyGIJqkQgJhOSUDToU8Fq2j+II9XaiDAKz pMjIbzn0amMWy6f7uvTqONWWAgrb2BvpGgK96KIHMo/bRBFXvNpSqjjD0sGF2Jw3mBdW 145i8lXK91hbjG2pemSo1hTeRE+id9nLa3NHKvdH4yRXVwjAWVEBQPbJauiGs/+UcboW 5OYeBd5IQhCprk7/gslnXEaNbsChjeiKfboQmphfxcO9YEVFuXXXysJq3oMdWU3ZZy3s 1yMA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=pOZ1KTG84jUOwZV4iyoT08ALYRTSycIVbayoyIWOUck=; b=GFWIvol95FUABTZuwWI5sfhI/N86vwEF0RRL/cqPRky1wRx7xaqrteT8/EkP61x8VL necJLxPzb9Pcasr2pl6tUarNcCTIP8KesakO5Z+lnKqGQZqkiZFQlaWMe7118EV2rfD7 1WkEUbZSJbK06rCfZ8wVICao9m1+vgXpZDBc9QGF7dFxXcjK+aCk0kYrQrwGMKhxytrC 4RXbgGUp+fDeLx+8sxUdYrTdqApARxHk4jpXynZAo+Sj1kz+W53H3ynw4g0j5/zfuVAb aoWbeyiD3u/PWVTEyuO6DfnDFq/bIZNEvxsq7poaKJpvxRa91UthwVc7hYb21mmLHS2X xN3g== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=fail (test mode) header.i=@armlinux.org.uk header.s=pandora-2019 header.b=XrVgjPIm; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=armlinux.org.uk Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id d20si2373769ejy.157.2021.06.03.06.47.52; Thu, 03 Jun 2021 06:48:15 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=fail (test mode) header.i=@armlinux.org.uk header.s=pandora-2019 header.b=XrVgjPIm; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=armlinux.org.uk Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S230127AbhFCNrd (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 3 Jun 2021 09:47:33 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:34188 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230084AbhFCNrc (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jun 2021 09:47:32 -0400 Received: from pandora.armlinux.org.uk (pandora.armlinux.org.uk [IPv6:2001:4d48:ad52:32c8:5054:ff:fe00:142]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2AD81C06174A for ; Thu, 3 Jun 2021 06:45:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=armlinux.org.uk; s=pandora-2019; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=pOZ1KTG84jUOwZV4iyoT08ALYRTSycIVbayoyIWOUck=; b=XrVgjPIm3zrW47fILGapTjzAv 3O/W1kx/TwUDLt6X9dLc49Y/7ll7KNFil833TJX1GSAlD/2QuflP5JRPOqxznYltX9YgAiMzRkvR5 QRS/9lR+U5Yrl8QjmZ4jZjtRyNkhERKk5cAjPg+DqxFYgAqFKrOHUGmB1CJKhjWhqfSTXLbGtRPEf TEz2HsIYQLGtLCsapRK06jYPZrVqzd9M0DSCiNPUUi+S19BcJ9HqxxMybN3wpoHCGwN9/JqoV9bMw VW1acw2ZUxk6uToxHYGyu+p8vsBh16FJtRahxxTe+C5eJA9Q81jshXRKDYUSolBDRreubmvLc7FYe jrS04zL7A==; Received: from shell.armlinux.org.uk ([fd8f:7570:feb6:1:5054:ff:fe00:4ec]:44674) by pandora.armlinux.org.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lonfG-0002qw-QE; Thu, 03 Jun 2021 14:45:38 +0100 Received: from linux by shell.armlinux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lonfE-00029t-9E; Thu, 03 Jun 2021 14:45:36 +0100 Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2021 14:45:36 +0100 From: "Russell King (Oracle)" To: Guenter Roeck Cc: Lee Jones , Thierry Reding , arm@kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Olof Johansson , Stefan Agner , Wolfram Sang , Catalin Marinas , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Stefano Stabellini , linux-arm-kernel , open list Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] ARM: xen: Register with kernel restart handler Message-ID: <20210603134536.GT30436@shell.armlinux.org.uk> References: <20191015145147.1106247-1-thierry.reding@gmail.com> <20191015145147.1106247-3-thierry.reding@gmail.com> <20210603131124.GA1040254@roeck-us.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210603131124.GA1040254@roeck-us.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: Russell King (Oracle) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 06:11:24AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Thu, Jun 03, 2021 at 01:43:36PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Tue, 15 Oct 2019 at 15:52, Thierry Reding > > wrote: > > > > > From: Guenter Roeck > > > > > > Register with kernel restart handler instead of setting arm_pm_restart > > > directly. > > > > > > Select a high priority of 192 to ensure that default restart handlers > > > are replaced if Xen is running. > > > > > > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann > > > Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang > > > Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini > > > Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck > > > Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding > > > --- > > > arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c | 12 ++++++++++-- > > > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > > This patch does appear to be useful. > > > > Is this just being solved in downstream trees at the moment? > > > > It would be nice if we could relinquish people of this burden and get it > > into Mainline finally. > > > > There must have been half a dozen attempts to send this patch series > upstream. I have tried, and others have tried. Each attempt failed with > someone else objecting for non-technical reasons (such as "we need more > reviews") or no reaction at all, and maintainers just don't pick it up. > > So, yes, this patch series can only be found in downstream trees, > and it seems pointless to submit it yet again. It has plenty of reviews and acks, so that's not the problem. If you look back at the 2019 attempt: 1) there was a pull request sent on the 2 October 2019 to the arm soc guys to merge a series that quite obviously is outside of their remit as it touches mostly ARM core code - it should have been sent to me but wasn't, not even as a Cc. 2) I raised that issue, and as I could find no trace of the patches, I asked for the to be posted - which they were, eventually, two weeks later. It looks like I completely missed the patches amongst all the other email I don't bother to read anymore though. In any case, the pull request by that time would have been completely forgotten about. And that's where it ended - no apparent follow-ups until now. *Shrug*. So in summary, I was expected to notice the patches amongst all the other email, and then remember that there was a pull request that wasn't even addressed to me... -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!